45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      What Stakeholder Theory is Not

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The term stakeholder is a powerful one. This is due, to a significant degree, to its conceptual breadth. The term means different things to different people and hence evokes praise or scorn from a wide variety of scholars and practitioners. Such breadth of interpretation, though one of stakeholder theory’s greatest strengths, is also one of its most prominent theoretical liabilities. The goal of the current paper is like that of a controlled burn that clears away some of the underbrush of misinterpretation in the hope of denying easy fuel to the critical conflagration that would raze the theory. We aim to narrow its technical meaning for greater facility of use in management and organizational studies. By elaborating a number of common misinterpretations – critical and friendly – of the theory, we hope to render a stronger and more convincing theory as a starting place for future research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          STAKEHOLDER-AGENCY THEORY

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of Fairness

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Getting Real: Stakeholder Theory, Managerial Practice, and the General Irrelevance of Fiduciary Duties Owed to Shareholders

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                applab
                Business Ethics Quarterly
                Bus. Ethics Q.
                Philosophy Documentation Center
                1052-150X
                2153-3326
                October 2003
                January 2015
                : 13
                : 04
                : 479-502
                Article
                10.5840/beq200313434
                e4a1dacb-a951-4336-8221-704b3d377e1f
                © 2003
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article