3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and Validation of a Bayesian Network for Supporting the Etiological Diagnosis of Uveitis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The etiological diagnosis of uveitis is complex. We aimed to implement and validate a Bayesian belief network algorithm for the differential diagnosis of the most relevant causes of uveitis. The training dataset ( n = 897) and the test dataset ( n = 154) were composed of all incident cases of uveitis admitted to two internal medicine departments, in two independent French centers (Lyon, 2003–2016 and Dijon, 2015–2017). The etiologies of uveitis were classified into eight groups. The algorithm was based on simple epidemiological characteristics (age, gender, and ethnicity) and anatomoclinical features of uveitis. The cross-validated estimate obtained in the training dataset concluded that the etiology of uveitis determined by the experts corresponded to one of the two most probable diagnoses in at least 77% of the cases. In the test dataset, this probability reached at least 83%. For the training and test datasets, when the most likely diagnosis was considered, the highest sensitivity was obtained for spondyloarthritis and HLA-B27-related uveitis (76% and 63%, respectively). The respective specificities were 93% and 54%. This algorithm could help junior and general ophthalmologists in the differential diagnosis of uveitis. It could guide the diagnostic work-up and help in the selection of further diagnostic investigations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria

          New evidence and consensus has led to further revision of the McDonald Criteria for diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The use of imaging for demonstration of dissemination of central nervous system lesions in space and time has been simplified, and in some circumstances dissemination in space and time can be established by a single scan. These revisions simplify the Criteria, preserve their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, address their applicability across populations, and may allow earlier diagnosis and more uniform and widespread use. Ann Neurol 2011
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature for Reporting Clinical Data. Results of the First International Workshop

            To begin a process of standardizing the methods for reporting clinical data in the field of uveitis. Consensus workshop. Members of an international working group were surveyed about diagnostic terminology, inflammation grading schema, and outcome measures, and the results used to develop a series of proposals to better standardize the use of these entities. Small groups employed nominal group techniques to achieve consensus on several of these issues. The group affirmed that an anatomic classification of uveitis should be used as a framework for subsequent work on diagnostic criteria for specific uveitic syndromes, and that the classification of uveitis entities should be on the basis of the location of the inflammation and not on the presence of structural complications. Issues regarding the use of the terms "intermediate uveitis," "pars planitis," "panuveitis," and descriptors of the onset and course of the uveitis were addressed. The following were adopted: standardized grading schema for anterior chamber cells, anterior chamber flare, and for vitreous haze; standardized methods of recording structural complications of uveitis; standardized definitions of outcomes, including "inactive" inflammation, "improvement'; and "worsening" of the inflammation, and "corticosteroid sparing," and standardized guidelines for reporting visual acuity outcomes. A process of standardizing the approach to reporting clinical data in uveitis research has begun, and several terms have been standardized.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general.

              To evaluate new classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA) in patients with SpA with peripheral manifestations only. In this Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) study, two prespecified sets of criteria were compared against the European Spondylarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) and Amor criteria in newly referred consecutive patients with undiagnosed peripheral arthritis, and/or enthesitis, and/or dactylitis that usually began before 45 years of age. The clinical diagnosis (SpA vs no SpA) made by the ASAS rheumatologist served as reference standard. In all, 24 ASAS centres included 266 patients, with a final diagnosis of SpA being made in 66.2%. After adjustments a final set of criteria showed the best balance between sensitivity (77.8%) and specificity (82.9%): arthritis and/or enthesitis and/or dactylitis plus (A) one or more of the following parameters: psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, preceding infection, human leucocyte antigen B27, uveitis, sacroiliitis on imaging, or (B) two or more other parameters: arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, inflammatory back pain in the past, family history of SpA. The new criteria performed better than modified versions of the ESSG (sensitivity 62.5%, specificity 81.1%) and the Amor criteria (sensitivity 39.8%, specificity 97.8%), particularly regarding sensitivity. In the entire ASAS population of 975 patients the combined use of ASAS criteria for axial SpA and ASAS criteria for peripheral SpA also had a better balance (sensitivity 79.5%, specificity 83.3%) than the modified ESSG (sensitivity 79.1%, specificity 68.8%) and Amor criteria (sensitivity 67.5%, specificity 86.7%), respectively. The new ASAS classification criteria for peripheral SpA performed well in patients presenting with peripheral arthritis, enthesitis and/or dactylitis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                30 July 2021
                August 2021
                : 10
                : 15
                : 3398
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard-Lyon 1, F-69004 Lyon, France; yvan.jamilloux@ 123456chu-lyon.fr
                [2 ]Service de Biostatistique et Bioinformatique, Pôle Santé Publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France; nicolas.romain-scelle@ 123456chu-lyon.fr (N.R.-S.); muriel.rabilloud@ 123456chu-lyon.fr (M.R.); coralie.morel@ 123456chu-lyon.fr (C.M.); delphine.maucort-boulch@ 123456chu-lyon.fr (D.M.-B.)
                [3 ]Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, Équipe Biostatistique-Santé, CNRS, UMR 5558, F-69100 Villeurbanne, France
                [4 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard-Lyon 1, F-69004 Lyon, France; laurent.kodjikian@ 123456chu-lyon.fr
                [5 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital, F-21000 Dijon, France; philip.bielefeld@ 123456chu-dijon.fr
                [6 ]Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, F-69000 Lyon, France
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: pascal.seve@ 123456chu-lyon.fr
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5249-3650
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1324-0356
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-6716
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0042-7787
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3070-3842
                Article
                jcm-10-03398
                10.3390/jcm10153398
                8347147
                34362175
                e0f7886a-75ef-4789-9bee-b48b54329ae8
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 18 June 2021
                : 27 July 2021
                Categories
                Article

                uveitis,diagnosis,algorithm,artificial intelligence,bayesian network

                Comments

                Comment on this article