30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Paxlovid Associated with Decreased Hospitalization Rate Among Adults with COVID-19 — United States, April–September 2022

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid), an oral antiviral treatment, is authorized for adults with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who are at increased risk for progression to severe illness. However, real-world evidence on the benefit of Paxlovid, according to vaccination status, age group, and underlying health conditions, is limited. To examine the benefit of Paxlovid in adults aged ≥18 years in the United States, a large electronic health record (EHR) data set (Cosmos † ) was analyzed to assess the association between receiving a prescription for Paxlovid and hospitalization with a COVID-19 diagnosis in the ensuing 30 days. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate this association, adjusted for demographic characteristics, geographic location, vaccination, previous infection, and number of underlying health conditions. Among 699,848 adults aged ≥18 years eligible for Paxlovid during April–August 2022, 28.4% received a Paxlovid prescription within 5 days of COVID-19 diagnosis. Being prescribed Paxlovid was associated with a lower hospitalization rate among the overall study population (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.49), among those who had received ≥3 mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (aHR = 0.50), and across age groups (18–49 years: aHR = 0.59; 50–64 years: aHR = 0.40; and ≥65 years: aHR = 0.53). Paxlovid should be prescribed to eligible adults to reduce the risk of COVID-19–associated hospitalization. Paxlovid is an oral antiviral medication that received Emergency Use Authorization by the Food and Drug Administration on December 22, 2021 ( 1 ), for use in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 at high risk for progression to severe illness. Eligibility for Paxlovid includes 1) receipt of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result (including home antigen test), 2) symptoms consistent with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, 3) symptom onset within the past 5 days, 4) age ≥18 years (or age ≥12 years and weight ≥40 kg), 5) one or more risk factors for progression to severe COVID-19, 6) no known or suspected severe renal or hepatic impairment, 7) no history of clinically significant reactions (e.g., toxic epidermal necrolysis or Stevens-Johnson syndrome) to the active ingredients (nirmatrelvir or ritonavir) or other components of the product, and 8) no contraindicated medications. § A retrospective analysis was performed on patient records included in Cosmos, a data set that includes EHR information from >160 million persons in U.S. health systems covered by Epic, a health care software company (https://cosmos.epic.com). Inclusion criteria comprised 1) diagnosis of COVID-19 or a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result during April 1–August 31, 2022 ¶ ; 2) an outpatient encounter (telemedicine, in-person, urgent care, emergency department, or other)** associated with the COVID-19 diagnosis; 3) at least one previous face-to-face encounter in Cosmos during the 3 years preceding the COVID-19 diagnosis †† ; 4) age ≥50 years, or ≥18 years with a documented underlying health condition based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes or medical record fields §§ ; 5) not known to be pregnant; and 6) not known to have pharmacologic or medical contraindications to Paxlovid use. ¶¶ For patients with multiple SARS-CoV-2 infections during the study period, only data from the first infection were used in the analysis; date of diagnosis (earliest COVID-19 diagnosis code or positive SARS-CoV-2 test result) was used as a proxy for symptom onset, and Paxlovid receipt was defined as receiving a prescription for Paxlovid during the 5 days after COVID-19 diagnosis.*** The primary outcome was overnight COVID-19 hospitalization during the 30 days after the date of diagnosis; secondary outcomes were all-cause hospitalization and acute respiratory illness (ARI)–associated hospitalization. ††† Association between Paxlovid receipt and subsequent hospitalization was assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model, including age group, sex, race and ethnicity, social vulnerability index, §§§ number of underlying health conditions, U.S. Census Bureau region of residence, previous COVID-19 infection, and COVID-19 vaccination status. ¶¶¶ In-hospital COVID-19 mortality during an admission commencing during the 30-day follow-up period was described but not used as an analytic outcome because of concern about underascertainment. Persons receiving Paxlovid contributed unexposed time until the prescription date and exposed time after the prescription date; those not receiving Paxlovid contributed unexposed time. Follow-up time ended when a hospitalization occurred or at 30 days after diagnosis, whichever came first. To assess possible bias related to symptom severity at diagnosis, primary analyses were repeated either excluding telemedicine visits, or excluding patients hospitalized during the 2 days after diagnosis. This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.**** Among 1,713,120 persons aged ≥18 years with a COVID-19 diagnosis during April 1–August 31, 2022, 699,848 (40.9%) met the inclusion criteria, including 198,927 who received Paxlovid within 5 days after diagnosis and 500,921 who did not (Figure). Among all persons with COVID-19 who were eligible for Paxlovid, 15.0% had documentation of previous infection and 68.8% were confirmed to have received ≥2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses. Overall, 28.4% of eligible persons received Paxlovid. Paxlovid recipients were more likely to have a telehealth encounter (49.1%) than nonrecipients (18.4%, standardized mean difference = 0.69). Prevalences of underlying health conditions were similar among Paxlovid recipients and nonrecipients (Table 1), and 92.4% had at least one underlying condition. Persons who were immunocompromised †††† accounted for 9.4% (64,911) of the study population, 30.2% of whom received Paxlovid. During the 30 days after a COVID-19 diagnosis, 5,229 (0.75%) persons were hospitalized; 3,311 (63.3%) of these hospitalizations occurred among persons aged ≥65 years. Among the 198,927 Paxlovid recipients, 930 (0.47%) were hospitalized, §§§§ compared with 4,299 (0.86%) of nonrecipients. Among the 5,229 persons with a COVID-19 hospitalization, 930 (17.8%) received Paxlovid during the 5 days after diagnosis. Overall, 211 deaths were reported during a COVID-19 hospitalization. Among those who received Paxlovid, 0.01% (29 of 198,927) died compared with 0.04% (182 of 500,921) of persons who did not receive Paxlovid. FIGURE Identification of patients with COVID-19* who were eligible for treatment with Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir) — Cosmos, † United States, April–September 2022 Abbreviation: NAAT = nucleic acid amplification test. * Patients were classified as having COVID-19 based on a diagnosis code for COVID-19 or based on a positive SARS-CoV-2 antigen or nucleic acid amplification test. Among 1,713,120 adults aged ≥18 years who met this definition during April 1–August 1, 2022, 930,847 had a diagnosis code only, 159,878 had a positive NAAT result only, 12,874 had a positive antigen test result only, and 609,521 had both a diagnosis code and positive test result (NAAT or antigen test). Exclusions summarized at each level of the flow chart are not mutually exclusive. † Cosmos is an electronic health record dataset that includes information from >160 million persons in U.S. health systems covered by Epic. https://cosmos.epic.com The figure is a flow chart outlining the identification of patient records in the Cosmos data set that were used to examine the association between receiving a Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir) prescription within 5 days of COVID-19 diagnosis and COVID-19–associated hospitalization within 30 days in the United States during April–September 2022. TABLE 1 Characteristics of persons eligible for Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir) by prescription receipt within 5 days after COVID-19 diagnosis — Cosmos,* United States, April–September 2022 Characteristic No. (column %) Standardized mean difference Paxlovid prescribed 
(n = 198,927) Paxlovid not prescribed (n = 500,921) Age group, yrs 18–35 20,543 (10.3) 113,716 (22.7) −0.34 36–49 36,077 (18.1) 107,373 (21.4) −0.08 50–64 66,929 (33.7) 147,274 (29.4) 0.09 ≥65 75,378 (37.9) 132,558 (26.5) 0.25 Sex Female 122,921 (61.8) 316,677 (63.2) −0.03 Male 75,984 (38.2) 184,184 (36.8) 0.03 Race and ethnicity Black or African American, non-Hispanic 17,141 (8.6) 66,574 (13.3) −0.15 Hispanic or Latino 12,088 (6.1) 38,487 (7.7) −0.06 White, non-Hispanic 158,696 (79.8) 368,109 (73.5) 0.15 Other, non-Hispanic † 11,002 (5.5) 27,751 (5.5) 0.00 Social vulnerability index§ 0–0.25 (least vulnerable) 58,144 (29.5) 117,590 (23.7) 0.13 0.25–0.50 52,659 (26.7) 124,118 (25.0) 0.04 0.50–0.75 47,755 (24.2) 127,366 (25.7) −0.03 0.75–1.00 (most vulnerable) 38,902 (19.7) 126,632 (25.6) −0.14 U.S. Census Bureau region¶ Northeast 47,737 (24.0) 134,818 (26.9) −0.07 Midwest 78,925 (39.7) 189,000 (37.7) 0.04 South 51,784 (26.0) 140,818 (28.1) −0.05 West 20,481 (10.3) 36,285 (7.2) 0.11 Outpatient encounter type** Telemedicine 97,644 (49.1) 91,916 (18.4) 0.69 In-person 56,793 (28.6) 245,004 (48.9) −0.43 Urgent care 1,814 (0.9) 9,094 (1.8) −0.08 Emergency department 19,872 (10.0) 98,359 (19.6) −0.27 Other 22,804 (11.5) 56,548 (11.3) 0.01 Underlying health conditions†† 0 16,159 (8.1) 37,072 (7.4) 0.03 1 49,848 (25.1) 152,179 (30.4) −0.12 ≥2 132,920 (66.8) 311,670 (62.2) 0.10 Immunocompromised§§ No 179,321 (90.1) 455,616 (91.0) −0.03 Yes 19,606 (9.9) 45,305 (9.0) 0.03 Previous infection¶¶ No 180,373 (90.7) 414,440 (82.7) 0.24 Yes 18,554 (9.3) 86,481 (17.3) −0.24 Obesity No 100,035 (50.3) 257,590 (51.4) −0.02 Yes 98,892 (49.7) 243,331 (48.6) 0.02 Smoker (current or former) No 119,770 (60.2) 287,747 (57.4) 0.06 Yes 79,157 (39.8) 213,174 (42.6) −0.06 Diabetes No 161,177 (81.0) 424,246 (84.7) −0.10 Yes 37,750 (19.0) 76,675 (15.3) 0.10 COVID-19 vaccination status*** ≥3 mRNA doses 119,324 (60.0) 209,614 (41.9) 0.37 2 mRNA doses 36,924 (18.6) 115,444 (23.1) −0.11 Unvaccinated 30,619 (15.4) 141,931 (28.3) −0.32 Other 12,060 (6.1) 33,932 (6.8) −0.03 Month of COVID-19 diagnosis Apr 2022 10,581 (5.3) 50,116 (10.0) −0.18 May 2022 36,326 (18.3) 104,105 (20.8) −0.06 Jun 2022 40,747 (20.5) 104,418 (20.9) −0.01 Jul 2022 58,961 (29.6) 126,991 (25.4) 0.10 Aug 2022 52,312 (26.3) 115,291 (23.0) 0.08 * Cosmos is an electronic health record dataset that includes information from >160 million persons in U.S. health systems covered by Epic. https://cosmos.epic.com † Includes American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, or Asian, or other race. § https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/index.html ¶ https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdf ** Telemedicine included virtual, electronic, and telephone encounters. In-person included in-person outpatient encounters not in the urgent care or emergency department setting. Other included all other outpatient encounters which could not be categorized clearly. †† https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/clinical-care/underlyingconditions.html (Accessed October 24, 2022). §§ Immunocompromised status was defined using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes (adapted from https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/73/11/e4353/6060064 or immunocompromising medication prescribed in the past 6 months (adapted from https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201507-415BC). ¶¶ Previous infection was defined as a COVID-19 diagnosis code or positive COVID-19 nucleic acid amplification test result or antigen test result >90 days before the current diagnosis. *** Vaccination categories included 1) unvaccinated if no COVID-19 vaccine had been received; 2) 2 mRNA dose-recipients if ≥14 days had elapsed after the second dose and no subsequent doses had been received or <7 days since receipt of third dose; 3) ≥3 mRNA dose-recipients if ≥7 days had elapsed since receipt of the third dose; and 4) other recipient if any Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) vaccine, other vaccine, or 1 mRNA vaccine dose had been received any time before COVID-19 diagnosis. Paxlovid receipt was associated with protection against hospitalization overall (aHR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.46–0.53) (Table 2), including among persons who had received ≥3 mRNA vaccine doses (0.50, 95% CI = 0.45–0.55) and 2 previous mRNA vaccine doses (0.50, 95% CI = 0.42–0.58). Paxlovid receipt was associated with lower hospitalization rates among persons aged 18–49 years (aHR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.48–0.71), 50–64 years (0.40, 95% CI = 0.34–0.48), and ≥65 years (0.53, 95% CI = 0.48–0.58). Among persons aged 18–49 years, Paxlovid receipt was associated with lower hospitalization rates among persons who had received ≥3 mRNA vaccine doses (aHR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.53–1.06) and those with only one underlying health condition (aHR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.58–1.44), but these estimates did not reach statistical significance. Estimated protection by Paxlovid was similar by month of diagnosis. Findings from sensitivity analyses, excluding telemedicine encounters and patients hospitalized during the first 2 days after diagnosis, also indicated significant reduction in hospitalization among Paxlovid recipients. ¶¶¶¶ In the analysis of secondary outcomes, among the overall study population, Paxlovid receipt was associated with a lower rate of all-cause hospitalization (aHR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.43–0.48) and ARI-associated hospitalization (aHR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.45–0.51). TABLE 2 Adjusted hazard ratios for COVID-19–associated hospitalization based on Paxlovid prescription receipt (exposure) — Cosmos,* United States, April–September 2022 Characteristic Adjusted HR (95% CI)† No. of participants No. hospitalized Events per 100,000 person-days Overall Exposed§ Unexposed§ Total 0.49 (0.46–0.53) 693,084 5,229 25.31 15.88 29.05 COVID-19 vaccination status¶ Vaccinated (≥3 mRNA doses) 0.50 (0.45–0.55) 310,196 2,126 22.98 14.30 27.87 Vaccinated (2 mRNA doses) 0.50 (0.42–0.58) 149,498 1,086 24.37 16.37 26.92 Unvaccinated 0.50 (0.43–0.59) 170,789 1,477 29.05 19.60 31.08 UHC** 0 0.89 (0.58–1.36) 52,592 106 6.73 6.51 6.83 1 0.57 (0.45–0.71) 200,116 503 8.40 6.46 9.03 ≥2 0.47 (0.44–0.51) 440,376 4,620 35.29 20.56 41.57 Previous infection †† No 0.48 (0.44–0.51) 589,147 4,715 26.86 16.12 31.53 Yes 0.76 (0.60–0.98) 103,937 514 16.56 13.54 17.20 Immunocompromised§§ No 0.49 (0.45–0.53) 628,706 3,770 20.09 12.61 23.03 Yes 0.50 (0.44–0.58) 64,378 1,459 77.01 45.99 90.49 Month of COVID-19 diagnosis Apr 2022 0.54 (0.40–0.71) 60,001 450 25.16 17.77 26.71 May 2022 0.57 (0.48–0.67) 139,062 979 23.61 17.06 25.88 Jun 2022 0.51 (0.43–0.60) 143,706 1,006 23.48 15.02 26.76 Jul 2022 0.46 (0.40–0.53) 184,153 1,432 26.09 15.65 30.94 Aug 2022 0.44 (0.38–0.51) 166,162 1,362 27.52 15.60 32.93 Age group, yrs 18–49 0.59 (0.48–0.71) 275,930 886 10.73 6.99 11.68 50–64 0.40 (0.34–0.48) 211,940 1,032 16.30 7.90 20.10 ≥65 0.53 (0.48–0.58) 205,214 3,311 54.56 29.72 68.80 By age group, yrs 18–49 Vaccinated (≥3 mRNA doses) 0.75 (0.53–1.06) 84,054 178 7.07 6.10 7.46 Vaccinated (2 mRNA doses) 0.53 (0.35–0.82) 70,159 198 9.43 6.20 10.16 Unvaccinated 0.54 (0.39–0.76) 97,637 417 14.29 9.09 15.13 1 UHC 0.91 (0.58–1.44) 109,620 157 4.78 4.11 4.91 ≥2 UHC 0.54 (0.43–0.67) 166,310 729 14.67 8.35 16.54 50–64 Vaccinated (≥3 mRNA doses) 0.41 (0.30–0.55) 98,699 284 9.61 5.28 12.11 Vaccinated (2 mRNA doses) 0.46 (0.33–0.63) 47,111 265 18.84 10.96 21.89 Unvaccinated 0.38 (0.27–0.53) 45,154 355 26.39 12.43 30.35 No UHC 1.11 (0.46–2.68) 32,519 25 2.56 2.87 2.46 1 UHC 0.30 (0.17–0.55) 53,493 109 6.80 2.45 8.72 ≥2 UHC 0.40 (0.33–0.48) 125,928 898 23.91 11.04 30.26 ≥65 Vaccinated (≥3 mRNA doses) 0.51 (0.46–0.57) 127,443 1,664 44.02 24.51 57.35 Vaccinated (2 mRNA doses) 0.53 (0.43–0.65) 32,228 623 65.58 36.83 78.59 Unvaccinated 0.58 (0.47–0.72) 27,998 705 85.92 52.75 96.15 No UHC 0.84 (0.51–1.36) 20,073 81 13.50 10.34 15.49 1 UHC 0.63 (0.47–0.85) 37,003 237 21.47 13.66 26.77 ≥2 UHC 0.51 (0.47–0.56) 148,138 2,993 68.58 37.33 85.48 Abbreviations: HR = hazard ratio; UHC = underlying health condition. * Cosmos is an electronic health record dataset that includes information from >160 million persons in U.S. health systems covered by Epic. https://cosmos.epic.com † 95% CIs that exclude 1 were considered to be statistically significant. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, social vulnerability index, number of underlying health conditions, U.S. Census Bureau region of residence, previous infection, and COVID-19 vaccination status, excluding the stratum of interest. § Persons receiving Paxlovid contributed unexposed time until the prescription date and exposed time after the prescription date; those not receiving Paxlovid contributed unexposed time. Follow-up time ended when a hospitalization occurred or at 30-days after diagnosis, whichever came first. ¶ Vaccination categories included 1) unvaccinated if no COVID-19 vaccine had been received; 2) 2 mRNA-dose recipients if ≥14 days had elapsed after the second dose and no subsequent doses had been received or <7 days since receipt of third dose; 3) ≥3 mRNA-dose recipients if ≥7 days had elapsed since receipt of the third dose; and 4) other recipient if any Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) vaccine, other vaccine, or 1 mRNA vaccine dose had been received any time before COVID-19 diagnosis. ** https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/clinical-care/underlyingconditions.html (Accessed October 24, 2022). †† Previous infection was defined as a COVID-19 diagnosis code or positive COVID-19 nucleic acid amplification test result or antigen test result >90 days before the current diagnosis. §§ Immunocompromised status was defined using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes (adapted from https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/73/11/e4353/6060064 or immunocompromising medication prescribed during the past 6 months (adapted from https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201507-415BC). Discussion In a sample of U.S. COVID-19 patients, many of whom had previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or were vaccinated against COVID-19, the overall COVID-19 hospitalization rate was 51% lower among those who had received a prescription for Paxlovid for presumed mild-to-moderate COVID-19, compared with those who did not. Similar benefit was seen among persons who had received ≥2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses. The initial randomized clinical trial of Paxlovid, which showed an 89% reduction in severe COVID-19 outcomes, was conducted in unvaccinated persons with no previous infection during the period preceding Omicron variant predominance ( 2 ). This real-word analysis demonstrated that being prescribed Paxlovid is associated with a substantially reduced hospitalization risk among persons with previous immunity from infection or vaccination in the setting of the current circulating Omicron subvariants. These findings parallel those of other studies indicating added protection from Paxlovid even among persons with previous infection or vaccination ( 3 – 8 ). Paxlovid conferred stable protection during a period in which multiple Omicron subvariants predominated in the United States. Protection against different predominant SARS-CoV-2 subvariants is consistent with Paxlovid’s mechanism of action, which inhibits a highly conserved viral protease ( 9 ). Current guidelines for Paxlovid indicate that persons who are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19–associated outcomes should be considered for Paxlovid, with older age being a predominant risk factor ( 10 ). A study from Israel among persons with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 found comparable benefit from Paxlovid against severe outcomes among persons aged ≥65 years but did not find statistical evidence of protection among younger age groups ( 3 ). The current analysis adds to overall evidence of protection from Paxlovid by finding a statistically significant benefit among adults aged 18–64 years, specifically among adults aged 50–64 years with one or more underlying health condition and those aged 18–49 years with two or more underlying health conditions. Although ascertainment of deaths was limited to those with a documented death during the COVID-19 hospital admission, the proportion of persons with in-hospital death was also lower among persons who received Paxlovid (0.01%) than among those who did not (0.04%). The findings in this report are subject to at least seven limitations. First, receipt of a Paxlovid prescription is a proxy for use of Paxlovid. Paxlovid course completion could not be confirmed, which might bias the results toward the null. Second, dates of diagnosis or test positivity were used to estimate illness onset but might not reflect date of symptom onset, or the presence of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 symptoms. Third, possible inclusion of asymptomatic COVID-19 infection in the nonrecipient comparison group could bias estimates toward the null. Fourth, participants with mild illness might be overrepresented among Paxlovid prescription recipients compared with nonrecipients, given the higher proportion of telemedicine visits, potentially leading to overestimation of protection from Paxlovid; however, a sensitivity analysis restricted to in-person encounters showed similar overall results. Fifth, underlying health conditions and immunocompromise were approximated using ICD-10 codes or medical record fields and might not capture the exact prevalences of these conditions. Sixth, although available vaccination information is automatically collected at each encounter, incomplete information could have limited differences in estimates by vaccination status. Finally, hospitalizations might be incompletely ascertained in Cosmos; this limitation was mitigated by including only persons with previous face-to-face encounters, indicating higher likelihood of hospitalization within a participating health system. This study demonstrates that Paxlovid provides protection against severe COVID-19–associated outcomes among persons for whom it is recommended, including those with vaccine-conferred immunity, and that it is underutilized among eligible persons with COVID-19. In this analysis, only 28% of eligible persons were prescribed Paxlovid. The ease of oral administration, short duration of therapy, and lower likelihood for resistance make Paxlovid a useful antiviral. Reduction in nonsevere outcomes, such as duration, number, and intensity of COVID-19 symptoms, requires further study. Paxlovid should be offered to eligible persons to protect against COVID-19 hospitalizations, irrespective of vaccination status, and especially among groups with the highest risk for severe outcomes, such as older adults and those with multiple underlying health conditions. Summary What is already known about this topic? Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) is an outpatient antiviral medication recommended for adults with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who have elevated risk of severe illness. What is added by this report? Among U.S. adults diagnosed with COVID-19, including those with previous infection or vaccination, persons who were prescribed Paxlovid within 5 days of diagnosis had a 51% lower hospitalization rate within 30 days after diagnosis than those who were not prescribed Paxlovid. What are the implications for public health practice? Paxlovid should be offered to eligible adults irrespective of vaccination status, especially in groups with the highest risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes, such as older adults and those with multiple underlying health conditions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Oral Nirmatrelvir for High-Risk, Nonhospitalized Adults with Covid-19

          Background Nirmatrelvir is an orally administered severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 main protease (M pro ) inhibitor with potent pan–human-coronavirus activity in vitro. Methods We conducted a phase 2–3 double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in which symptomatic, unvaccinated, nonhospitalized adults at high risk for progression to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 300 mg of nirmatrelvir plus 100 mg of ritonavir (a pharmacokinetic enhancer) or placebo every 12 hours for 5 days. Covid-19–related hospitalization or death from any cause through day 28, viral load, and safety were evaluated. Results A total of 2246 patients underwent randomization; 1120 patients received nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (nirmatrelvir group) and 1126 received placebo (placebo group). In the planned interim analysis of patients treated within 3 days after symptom onset (modified intention-to treat population, comprising 774 of the 1361 patients in the full analysis population), the incidence of Covid-19–related hospitalization or death by day 28 was lower in the nirmatrelvir group than in the placebo group by 6.32 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], −9.04 to −3.59; P<0.001; relative risk reduction, 89.1%); the incidence was 0.77% (3 of 389 patients) in the nirmatrelvir group, with 0 deaths, as compared with 7.01% (27 of 385 patients) in the placebo group, with 7 deaths. Efficacy was maintained in the final analysis involving the 1379 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population, with a difference of −5.81 percentage points (95% CI, −7.78 to −3.84; P<0.001; relative risk reduction, 88.9%). All 13 deaths occurred in the placebo group. The viral load was lower with nirmaltrelvir plus ritonavir than with placebo at day 5 of treatment, with an adjusted mean difference of −0.868 log 10 copies per milliliter when treatment was initiated within 3 days after the onset of symptoms. The incidence of adverse events that emerged during the treatment period was similar in the two groups (any adverse event, 22.6% with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir vs. 23.9% with placebo; serious adverse events, 1.6% vs. 6.6%; and adverse events leading to discontinuation of the drugs or placebo, 2.1% vs. 4.2%). Dysgeusia (5.6% vs. 0.3%) and diarrhea (3.1% vs. 1.6%) occurred more frequently with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir than with placebo. Conclusions Treatment of symptomatic Covid-19 with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir resulted in a risk of progression to severe Covid-19 that was 89% lower than the risk with placebo, without evident safety concerns. (Supported by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04960202 .)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Remdesivir, Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir remain active against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and other variants of concern

            We assessed the in vitro antiviral activity of remdesivir and its parent nucleoside GS-441524, molnupiravir and its parent nucleoside EIDD-1931 and the viral protease inhibitor nirmatrelvir against the ancestral SARS-CoV2 strain and the five variants of concern including Omicron. VeroE6-GFP cells were pre-treated overnight with serial dilutions of the compounds before infection. The GFP signal was determined by high-content imaging on day 4 post-infection. All molecules have equipotent antiviral activity against the ancestral virus and the VOCs Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron. These findings are in line with the observation that the target proteins of these antivirals (respectively the viral RNA dependent RNA polymerase and the viral main protease Mpro) are highly conserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effectiveness of Paxlovid in Reducing Severe COVID-19 and Mortality in High Risk Patients

              Abstract Background Paxlovid was granted emergency use authorization for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19, based on the interim analysis of EPIC-HR trial. Paxlovid effectiveness needs to be assessed in a noncontrolled setting. In this study we used population-based real world data to evaluate the effectiveness of Paxlovid. Methods The database of the largest healthcare provider in Israel was used to identify all adults aged 18 years or older with first ever positive test for SARS-CoV-2 between January and February 2022, who were at high risk for severe COVID-19 and had no contraindications for Paxlovid use. Patients were included irrespective of their COVID-19 vaccination status. Cox hazard regression was used to estimate the 28 day HR for severe COVID-19 or mortality with Paxlovid examined as time-dependent variable. Results Overall, 180,351 eligible were included, of them only 4,737 (2.6%) were treated with Paxlovid, and 135,482 (75.1%) had adequate COVID-19 vaccination status. Both Paxlovid and adequate COVID-19 vaccination status were associated with significant decrease in the rate of severe COVID-19 or mortality with adjusted HR 0.54 (95% CI, 0.39-0.75) and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.17-0.22), respectively. Paxlovid appears to be more effective in older patients, immunosuppressed patients, and patients with underlying neurological or cardiovascular disease (interaction p-value <0.05 for all). No significant interaction was detected between Paxlovid treatment and COVID-19 vaccination status. Conclusions This study suggests that in the era of omicron and in real life setting Paxlovid is highly effective in reducing the risk of severe COVID-19 or mortality.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                WR
                Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                0149-2195
                1545-861X
                02 December 2022
                02 December 2022
                : 71
                : 48
                : 1531-1537
                Affiliations
                Coronavirus and Other Respiratory Viruses Division (proposed), National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC; Epic Research, Epic Systems Corporation, Verona, Wisconsin.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Melisa M. Shah, bgn3@ 123456cdc.gov .
                Article
                mm7148e2
                10.15585/mmwr.mm7148e2
                9721144
                36454693
                df69800a-8025-4488-a830-f01eea8c70ec

                All material in the MMWR Series is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.

                History
                Categories
                Full Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article