For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
43
views
12
references
 Top references
cited by
87
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      257
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Psychometric Properties of the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II for Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE

          To perform the first comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II (HFS-II), a measure of the behavioral and affective dimensions of fear of hypoglycemia, using modern test-theory methods, including item-response theory (IRT).

          RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

          Surveys completed in four previous studies by 777 adults with type 1 diabetes were aggregated for analysis, with 289 subjects completing both subscales of the HFS-II and 488 subjects completing only the Worry subscale. The aggregated sample (53.3% female, 44.4% using insulin pumps) had a mean age of 41.9 years, diabetes duration of 23.8 years, HbA 1c value of 7.7%, and 1.4 severe hypoglycemic episodes in the past year. Data analysis included exploratory factor analysis using polychoric correlations and IRT. Factors were analyzed for fit, trait-level locations, point-measure correlations, and separation values.

          RESULTS

          Internal and test-retest reliability was good, as well as convergent validity, as demonstrated by significant correlations with other measures of psychological distress. Scores were significantly higher in subjects who had experienced severe hypoglycemia in the past year. Factor analyses validated the two subscales of the HFS-II. Item analyses showed that 12 of 15 items on the Behavior subscale, and all of the items on the Worry subscale had good-fit statistics.

          CONCLUSIONS

          The HFS-II is a reliable and valid measure of the fear of hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes, and factor analyses and IRT support the two separate subscales of the survey.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fear of hypoglycemia: quantification, validation, and utilization.

          D. J. Cox, Brittany Irvine, L Gonder-Frederick … (2015)
          Hypoglycemia can lead to various aversive symptomatic, affective, cognitive, physiological, and social consequences, which in turn can lead to the development of possible phobic avoidance behaviors associated with hypoglycemia. On the other hand, some patients may inappropriately deny or disregard warning signs of hypoglycemia. This study presents preliminary reliability and validity data on a psychometric instrument designed to quantify this fear: the hypoglycemic fear survey. The instrument was found to have internal consistency and test-retest stability, to covary with elevated glycosylated hemoglobin, and to be sensitive to a behavioral treatment program designed to increase awareness of hypoglycemia.
          Article 0 comments Cited 103 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Predictors of fear of hypoglycemia in adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their parents.

            Lee Ritterband, Likun Hou, Maxine Fisher … (2006)
            This study tested the hypothesis that both trait anxiety and hypoglycemic history contribute to fear of hypoglycemia (FOH) both in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and in their parents, and relationships between FOH and other variables including metabolic control, symptom perception, and use of insulin pump therapy. Thirty-nine parent-adolescent pairs completed questionnaires assessing background and clinical information, hypoglycemic episodes, FOH, and trait anxiety. Adolescent blood was also sampled for glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurement. In adolescents, both trait anxiety and frequency of severe hypoglycemic episodes were significant predictors of FOH, together accounting for almost 50% of the variance. Parental FOH was not predicted by their own trait anxiety or their child's hypoglycemic history but by whether they believed that their child carried emergency glucose. FOH was not related to metabolic control, although adolescents who experienced recent severe hypoglycemia (SH) with unconsciousness had significantly higher HbA1c. Parental trait anxiety significantly correlated with child trait anxiety, but parent-child levels of FOH were unrelated. Neither trait anxiety nor FOH related to reported symptoms, and FOH was not lower in parents with insulin pump therapy. Consistent with findings from adult patient populations, trait anxiety levels and recent experiences with hypoglycemia predict FOH in adolescents with T1DM. In parents, however, beliefs about their adolescents' ability to cope with hypoglycemic episodes predicted FOH. FOH in adolescents with T1DM and their parents is a complex construct influenced by multiple personality and situational and behavioral factors, and its impact on diabetes management remains unclear.
            Article 0 comments Cited 37 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Algorithmic evaluation of metabolic control and risk of severe hypoglycemia in type 1 and type 2 diabetes using self-monitoring blood glucose data.

              Adrienne D. Cox, Boris Kovatchev, Anand Kumar … (2002)
              The optimization of metabolic control in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM and T2DM, respectively) [i.e., the maintenance of near-normal hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia] could be enhanced by analysis of self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) data assessing complementary processes: exposure to hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. We present algorithms that simultaneously estimate HbA(1)c and risk for significant hypoglycemia using 45-60 days of SMBG. The algorithms were developed using a primary data for 96 subjects with T1DM (n = 48) and T2DM, and were validated in an external data for 520 subjects with T1DM (n = 231) and T2DM. All subjects were on insulin. In the primary (external) data the estimation of HbA(1c) had absolute error of 0.5 (0.7) units of HbA(1c) and percent error of 6.8% (8.1%); 96% (96%) of all estimates were within 20% from reference HbA(1c). The SMBG-estimated value of HbA(1c) was closer to current reference HbA(1c) than a reference HbA(1c) value taken only 2-3 months ago. The results in T1DM and T2DM were similar. Linear model predicted future significant hypoglycemia (R(2) = 62%, p < 0.0001). The leading predictor was a previously introduced Low Blood Glucose Index, which alone had R(2) = 55%. Probability model assessed accurately the odds for future moderate/severe hypoglycemia (coefficients of determination 92%/94%). Four risk categories were identified; within moderate- and high-risk category, there was no difference between T1DM and T2DM in the occurrence of prospective significant hypoglycemia. SMBG data allow for accurate estimation of the two most important markers of metabolic control in T1DM and T2DM - HbA(1c) and risk for hypoglycemia.
              Article 0 comments Cited 32 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): Diabetes Care
                Journal ID (hwp): diacare
                Journal ID (pmc): dcare
                Journal ID (publisher-id): Diabetes Care
                Title: Diabetes Care
                Publisher: American Diabetes Association
                ISSN (Print): 0149-5992
                ISSN (Electronic): 1935-5548
                Publication date (Print): April 2011
                Publication date (Electronic): 21 March 2011
                Volume: 34
                Issue: 4
                Pages: 801-806
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Health Sciences Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
                [2] 2Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Linda A. Gonder-Frederick, lag3g@ 123456virginia.edu
                Article
                Publisher ID: 1343
                DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1343
                PMC ID: 3064031
                PubMed ID: 21346182
                SO-VID: df57999f-9847-4bcd-9d60-5421a13f9a9c
                Copyright © © 2011 by the American Diabetes Association.
                License:

                Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

                History
                Date received : 13 July 2010
                Date accepted : 22 January 2011
                Categories
                Subject: Original Research
                Subject: Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research

                ScienceOpen disciplines: Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Data availability:
                ScienceOpen disciplines: Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content257

                See all similar

                Cited by87

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors338

                See all reference authors