5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      EFFECT OF ACTIVE AND PASSIVE SIGHS IN NORMOXIA AND HYPEROXIA ON THE BREATHING OF PATIENTS ANAESTHETIZED WITH INFUSIONS OF PROPOFOL

      ,
      British Journal of Anaesthesia
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Spontaneous augmented breaths (active sighs) reduced the tidal volume and inspiratory time of succeeding breaths; manual lung inflations (passive sighs) reduced the tidal volume but had little effect on inspiratory time. Sighs in air, whether active or passive, reduced tidal volume more than sighs in hyperoxia (100% oxygen or 33% oxygen in nitrous oxide) after both active and passive sighs (overall difference about 10%); the reduction in inspiratory time after a sigh was less affected by gas mixture. Calculated mean inspiratory flow was reduced after passive sighs, but active sighs were more likely to cause arousal, which complicated the analysis. Tidal volume was reduced after a sigh partly because of reduced peripheral chemoreceptor input, the main effect of which was to reduce inspiratory flow, and partly because inspiratory time was shorter. Although the chemoreceptors may affect inspiratory time after a sigh, the greater effect of active sighs compared with passive sighs makes it likely that the shortening was either part of the neural output that causes spontaneous sighs, or was caused by mechanoreceptor input not mimicked by manual lung inflation.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          British Journal of Anaesthesia
          British Journal of Anaesthesia
          Oxford University Press (OUP)
          00070912
          May 1993
          May 1993
          : 70
          : 5
          : 536-541
          Article
          10.1093/bja/70.5.536
          8318327
          df43d887-f909-4e54-86f5-c1e41e95cb9c
          © 1993

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          https://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article