Avaliação do desempenho do reator anaeróbio de manta de lodo (uasb) em escala laboratorial na remoção da carga orgânica de águas residuárias da suinocultura  <span class="so-article-trans-title" dir="auto"> Translated title: Performance evaluation of a lab-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASB) removing organic loading rate from swine manure </span>

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Objetivou-se com o presente trabalho avaliar o desempenho do reator anaeróbio de manta de lodo (UASB-Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket) construído em escala laboratorial na redução da carga orgânica poluidora dos despejos suinícolas brutos. O sistema completo foi composto de um tanque de acidificação e equalização, reator UASB e lagoa aerada facultativa. O tempo de detenção hidráulica (TDH) e temperatura adotada para o reator UASB foram de 30 horas e 30 ºC, respectivamente. Os valores médios afluentes de DQO T, ST e SVT foram de 1806, 1810 e 1240 mg.L-1. As eficiências de remoção de DQO T, ST e SVT foram de 84, 58 e 73%, respectivamente. O sistema se apresentou-se estável, com boas condições de tamponamento, retenção e digestibilidade de sólidos, demonstrando que os critérios adotados foram adequados, principalmente aqueles referentes ao TDH, carga orgânica volumétrica (COV) e temperatura.

Translated abstract

The present work was carried out in order to evaluate the performance of a lab scale Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket reactor (UASB) treating liquid effluent from swine manure without solids separation. The treatment system consisted of one acidification tank, which also equalized the substrate, an UASB reactor, and an aerated facultative pound. The hydraulic retention time (HRT) and temperature adopted for the UASB reactor were 30h and 30ºC, respectively. The influent average values of Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Solids (TS) and Total Volatile Solids (TVS) were 1806, 1810 and 1240 mg.L-1. The removal efficiencies were 84, 58 and 73 %, respectively. The system presented good stability and buffering conditions, and also a good solids digestibility, showing that the research criteria adopted was adequate, mainly those parameters referred to the HRT, Volumetric Organic Loading Rate (VOLR) and temperature.

Related collections

Most cited references 8

Record: found
Abstract: found
Book: not found

Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater

(1995)

The best compilation of water & wastewater analysis methods available anywhere! This reorganized reference source is written for many scientific fields, including chemistry, engineering, biology, health, the environment & geo-sciences. More than 340 hods are presented, each with step-by-step procedures for precise analysis of water & wastewater chemical constituents, sanitary quality, & physical & biological characteristics. Twenty-three new methods have been added & 26 methods have been revised to reflect the very latest technical advances. You'll find a revised method for turbidity, new information on UV-absorbing organic constituents cited in the Information Collection Rule (ICR), new procedures for laboratory occupational health & safety, & much more. Incorporates the methods published in the 18th Edition Supplement. CONTENTS INCLUDE : Physical Examination, Determination of Metals & Other Inorganic Nonmetallic Constituents, Determination of Organic Constituents, Examination of Water & Wastewater Radioactivity, Toxicity Test Methods for Aquatic Organisms, Microbiological Examination of Water, Biological Examination of Water. $180.00 Nonmembers, $140.00 APHA, AWWA & WEF members.