36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Treatment Outcomes and Safety of Mobocertinib in Platinum-Pretreated Patients With EGFR Exon 20 Insertion–Positive Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer : A Phase 1/2 Open-label Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This nonrandomized clinical trial evaluates the treatment outcomes and safety of mobocertinib treatment in patients with previously treated EGFR exon 20 insertion–positive metastatic non–small cell lung cancer.

          Key Points

          Question

          Does mobocertinib have activity in patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion ( EGFRex20ins)–positive metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy?

          Findings

          In this nonrandomized clinical trial, mobocertinib showed antitumor activity in patients with platinum-pretreated EGFRex20ins-positive mNSCLC, with a confirmed objective response rate of 28%, median duration of response of 17.5 months, and median progression-free survival of 7.3 months by independent review committee assessments. The safety profile was characterized by gastrointestinal and cutaneous adverse events, which were largely manageable.

          Meaning

          Mobocertinib has a favorable risk-benefit profile in patients with previously treated EGFRex20ins-positive mNSCLC.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertion ( EGFRex20ins) mutations is associated with a poor prognosis. Mobocertinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor designed to selectively target EGFRex20ins mutations.

          Objective

          To evaluate treatment outcomes and safety of mobocertinib in patients with previously treated EGFRex20ins-positive mNSCLC.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This 3-part, open-label, phase 1/2 nonrandomized clinical trial with dose-escalation/dose-expansion cohorts (28 sites in the US) and a single-arm extension cohort (EXCLAIM; 40 sites in Asia, Europe, and North America) was conducted between June 2016 and November 2020 (data cutoff date). The primary analysis populations were the platinum-pretreated patients (PPP) cohort and the EXCLAIM cohort. The PPP cohort included 114 patients with platinum-pretreated EGFRex20ins-positive mNSCLC who received mobocertinib 160 mg once daily from the dose-escalation (n = 6), dose-expansion (n = 22), and EXCLAIM (n = 86) cohorts. The EXCLAIM cohort included 96 patients with previously treated EGFRex20ins-positive mNSCLC (10 were not platinum pretreated and thus were excluded from the PPP cohort).

          Interventions

          Mobocertinib 160 mg once daily.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The primary end point of the PPP and EXCLAIM cohorts was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) assessed by independent review committee (IRC). Secondary end points included confirmed ORR by investigator, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety.

          Results

          Among the PPP (n = 114) and EXCLAIM (n = 96) cohorts, the median (range) age was 60 (27-84) and 59 (27-80) years, respectively; most patients were women (75 [66%] and 62 [65%], respectively) and of Asian race (68 [60%] and 66 [69%], respectively). At data cutoff, median follow-up was 14.2 months in the PPP cohort (median 2 prior anticancer regimens; 40 [35%] had baseline brain metastases), with confirmed ORR of 28% (95% CI, 20%-37%) by IRC assessment and 35% (95% CI, 26%-45%) by investigator assessment; median duration of response by IRC assessment was 17.5 months (95% CI, 7.4-20.3). Median progression-free survival by IRC assessment was 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.5-9.2). Median overall survival was 24.0 months (95% CI, 14.6-28.8). In the EXCLAIM cohort, median follow-up was 13.0 months, with confirmed ORR by IRC assessment of 25% (95% CI, 17%-35%) and by investigator assessment of 32% (95% CI, 23%-43%). The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea and rash.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this open-label, phase 1/2 nonrandomized clinical trial, mobocertinib was associated with clinically meaningful benefit in patients with previously treated EGFRex20ins-positive mNSCLC, with a manageable safety profile.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02716116

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

          Assessment of the change in tumour burden is an important feature of the clinical evaluation of cancer therapeutics: both tumour shrinkage (objective response) and disease progression are useful endpoints in clinical trials. Since RECIST was published in 2000, many investigators, cooperative groups, industry and government authorities have adopted these criteria in the assessment of treatment outcomes. However, a number of questions and issues have arisen which have led to the development of a revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Evidence for changes, summarised in separate papers in this special issue, has come from assessment of a large data warehouse (>6500 patients), simulation studies and literature reviews. HIGHLIGHTS OF REVISED RECIST 1.1: Major changes include: Number of lesions to be assessed: based on evidence from numerous trial databases merged into a data warehouse for analysis purposes, the number of lesions required to assess tumour burden for response determination has been reduced from a maximum of 10 to a maximum of five total (and from five to two per organ, maximum). Assessment of pathological lymph nodes is now incorporated: nodes with a short axis of 15 mm are considered measurable and assessable as target lesions. The short axis measurement should be included in the sum of lesions in calculation of tumour response. Nodes that shrink to <10mm short axis are considered normal. Confirmation of response is required for trials with response primary endpoint but is no longer required in randomised studies since the control arm serves as appropriate means of interpretation of data. Disease progression is clarified in several aspects: in addition to the previous definition of progression in target disease of 20% increase in sum, a 5mm absolute increase is now required as well to guard against over calling PD when the total sum is very small. Furthermore, there is guidance offered on what constitutes 'unequivocal progression' of non-measurable/non-target disease, a source of confusion in the original RECIST guideline. Finally, a section on detection of new lesions, including the interpretation of FDG-PET scan assessment is included. Imaging guidance: the revised RECIST includes a new imaging appendix with updated recommendations on the optimal anatomical assessment of lesions. A key question considered by the RECIST Working Group in developing RECIST 1.1 was whether it was appropriate to move from anatomic unidimensional assessment of tumour burden to either volumetric anatomical assessment or to functional assessment with PET or MRI. It was concluded that, at present, there is not sufficient standardisation or evidence to abandon anatomical assessment of tumour burden. The only exception to this is in the use of FDG-PET imaging as an adjunct to determination of progression. As is detailed in the final paper in this special issue, the use of these promising newer approaches requires appropriate clinical validation studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

            Nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 programmed death 1 (PD-1) immune-checkpoint-inhibitor antibody, disrupts PD-1-mediated signaling and may restore antitumor immunity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial.

              Atezolizumab is a humanised antiprogrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody that inhibits PD-L1 and programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-L1 and B7-1 interactions, reinvigorating anticancer immunity. We assessed its efficacy and safety versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncology
                American Medical Association
                2374-2437
                2374-2445
                14 October 2021
                December 2021
                14 October 2021
                : 7
                : 12
                : e214761
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
                [2 ]Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
                [3 ]Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
                [4 ]Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
                [5 ]National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
                [6 ]Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
                [7 ]AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, Florida
                [8 ]Pacific Shores Medical Group, Long Beach, California
                [9 ]Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña Hospital Teresa Herrera-Materno Infantil, A Coruña, Spain
                [10 ]Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
                [11 ]Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, Massachusetts
                [12 ]Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: July 9, 2021.
                Published Online: October 14, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4761
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License. © 2021 Zhou C et al. JAMA Oncology.
                Corresponding Author: Caicun Zhou, PhD, MD, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, 507 Zhengmin Rd, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China ( caicunzhoudr@ 123456163.com ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Zhou had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Ramalingam, Riely, J. Lin, Mehta.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Zhou, T. Kim, S. Kim, Yang, Riely, Mekhail, Nguyen, Garcia Campelo, Felip, Vincent, Jin, Griffin, Bunn, J. Lin, H. Lin, Mehta, Jänne.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Zhou, Garcia Campelo, Jin, Mehta, Jänne.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Zhou, Ramalingam, T. Kim, S. Kim, Yang, Riely, Mekhail, Nguyen, Garcia Campelo, Felip, Vincent, Jin, Griffin, Bunn, J. Lin, H. Lin, Mehta.
                Statistical analysis: Bunn, J. Lin, H. Lin.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Zhou, Ramalingam, T. Kim, S. Kim, Riely, Felip, Jin, Jänne.
                Supervision: Zhou, Ramalingam, Yang, Nguyen, J. Lin, Mehta.
                Other—scientific oversight: Vincent.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Zhou reported personal fees for lecturing from Eli Lilly China, Sanofi, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Qilu, Hengrui, Innovent Biologics, Luye Pharma, TopAlliance Biosciences Inc, Amoy Diagnostics, and CStone Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. Dr Ramalingam reported grants to institution and personal fees from Takeda for participation in advisory board meeting during the conduct of the study; grants to institution from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, and Genmab; and personal fees for serving on scientific advisory boards from Eisai and GlaxoSmithKline outside the submitted work. Dr T. Kim reported grants from AstraZeneca-Korea Health Industry Development Institute and honoraria or advisory role from AstraZeneca, Boryung, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc, Novartis, Sanofi, and Takeda outside the submitted work. Dr Yang reported grants and personal fees (advisory board) from AstraZeneca; other to institution (advisory board) from Bayer, Janssen, and GlaxoSmithKline; personal fees (advisory board) from Roche, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Ono Pharmaceuticals; and personal fees (advisory board) and other to institution (advisory board) from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, Takeda, Yuhan, and Daiichi Sankyo outside the submitted work. Dr Riely reported grant funding for clinical trial conduct as well as editorial support for manuscript and presentation preparation from Takeda and grants from National Cancer Institute during the conduct of the study; nonfinancial support (provision of investigational agent for another clinical trial) from Takeda; and grants from Roche, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Mirati outside the submitted work. Dr Mekhail reported personal fees from Takeda outside the submitted work. Dr Garcia Campelo reported personal fees from Takeda during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Janssen, Roche, Novartis, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. Dr Felip reported personal fees (advisory board) from AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, GSK, Janssen, Merck KGaA, Puma Biotechnology, Sanofi Genzyme, Beigene, Medical Trends, Peptomyc, Regeneron, and Syneos Health; personal fees (speakers bureau) from Medscape, PeerVoice, Springer, prIME Oncology, Touch Medical, and CME Outfitters; personal fees (advisory board and speakers bureau) from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, and Roche; grants from Grant for Oncology Innovation (GOI) and Fundación Merck Salud; and serving as an independent member of the board for Grífols outside the submitted work. Drs Vincent, H. Lin, Mehta, and Bunn, and Ms Jin reported being employees of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, during the conduct of the study. Dr Jänne reported grants (sponsored research) and personal fees (consulting on drug development) from Takeda Oncology during the conduct of the study; grants (sponsored research) from Daiichi Sankyo, Puma Biotechnology, Astellas, and Revolution Medicines; grants (sponsored research) and personal fees (consulting on drug development) from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Eli Lilly; personal fees (consulting on drug development) from Roche/Genentech, Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Ignyta, Loxo Oncology, SFJ Pharmaceuticals, Voronoi, Daiichi Sankyo, Biocartis, Novartis, Sanofi, Mirati Therapeutics, Transcenta, Silicon Therapeutics, Syndax, Nuvalent, Bayer, Eisai, Allorion Therapeutics, Accutar Biotech, and AbbVie outside the submitted work; in addition, Dr Jänne had a patent for EGFR mutations licensed to Lab Corp, receiving postmarketing royalties from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute–owned intellectual property on EGFR mutations licensed to Lab Corp. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: The study was funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: This study was supported by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. The sponsor designed and conducted the study and collected the data together with the authors. The sponsor managed and analyzed the data. Data were interpreted by the authors and the sponsor. The sponsor together with the authors prepared, reviewed, and approved the manuscript and made the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 4.
                Additional Contributions: The authors would like to thank the patients, their families, and their caregivers; the study investigators and their team members at each study site; and colleagues from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Professional medical writing assistance was provided by Amy Zannikos, PharmD, and Lela Creutz, PhD, of Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company, Parsippany, New Jersey, and funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
                Article
                coi210069
                10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4761
                8517885
                34647988
                dc35f4c6-ab1a-4308-81d6-692dc2aef6a4
                Copyright 2021 Zhou C et al. JAMA Oncology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License.

                History
                : 23 April 2021
                : 9 July 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc
                Funded by: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online First
                Online Only
                Comments

                Comments

                Comment on this article