36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The importance of mindfulness in psychosocial distress and quality of life in dermatology patients†

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Mindfulness, defined as purposively and nonjudgementally paying attention in the present moment, could be used within psychosocial interventions to reduce the distress associated with social anxiety and avoidance found in many skin conditions. However, little is known about the relationship between naturally occurring levels of mindfulness and distress in dermatology patients.

          Objectives

          To examine the relationship between mindfulness and psychosocial distress in a dermatological population. It was hypothesized that higher levels of mindfulness would be associated with lower levels of social anxiety, anxiety, depression and skin shame, and with better quality of life.

          Methods

          Adult dermatology outpatients ( n = 120) from one hospital completed items assessing subjective severity, skin shame, fear of negative evaluation, anxiety and depression, quality of life, and levels of mindfulness.

          Results

          Considering depression, 14% reported mild, 5% moderate and 2·5% severe symptoms. For anxiety, 22% reported mild, 23% moderate and 6% severe symptoms. In addition, 33·4% reported clinically significant social anxiety. After controlling for subjective severity, mindfulness explained an additional 19% of the variance in depression, 39% in anxiety, 41% in social anxiety, 13% in skin shame and 6% in dermatological quality of life. One specific facet of mindfulness (acting with awareness) was found to be the most consistent predictor of distress.

          Conclusions

          The findings indicate that higher levels of mindfulness are associated with lower distress. This suggests that facilitating mindfulness may be helpful in reducing distress in dermatology patients, and the use of mindfulness techniques warrants further investigation.

          Abstract

          What's already known about this topic?

          • Correlation studies suggest that higher levels of mindfulness are related to lower levels of social anxiety.

          • Studies indicate that mindfulness can be beneficial for people experiencing a range of long‐term health conditions.

          • Mindfulness interventions have been beneficial in improving skin clearance and severity in patients with psoriasis.

          What does this study add?

          • This is the first study to show that mindfulness accounts for a significant amount of the variance in both psychological distress and quality of life in dermatology patients.

          • Mindfulness may play a particularly important role in social anxiety.

          • The study suggests that facilitating the ‘ability to attend to the present moment’ is a potential target for psychosocial interventions for patients distressed by their skin condition.

          What are the clinical implications of this work?

          • High levels of social anxiety, depression and anxiety highlight the need for psychological interventions to be available to dermatology patients.

          • Mindfulness interventions could benefit people living with skin conditions who are experiencing psychological distress – either as stand‐alone low‐intensity interventions or incorporated into cognitive behavioural therapy.

          • Using mindfulness to bring attention to the present moment may reduce self‐focused attention, which is a key characteristic of social anxiety.

          Linked Comment: Fordham. Br J Dermatol 2016; 175:864–865 .

          Plain language summary available online

          Video Commentary

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

          Fjorback LO, Arendt M, Ørnbøl E, Fink P, Walach H. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy - a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.   To systematically review the evidence for MBSR and MBCT.   Systematic searches of Medline, PsycInfo and Embase were performed in October 2010. MBSR, MBCT and Mindfulness Meditation were key words. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) using the standard MBSR/MBCT programme with a minimum of 33 participants were included.   The search produced 72 articles, of which 21 were included. MBSR improved mental health in 11 studies compared to wait list control or treatment as usual (TAU) and was as efficacious as active control group in three studies. MBCT reduced the risk of depressive relapse in two studies compared to TAU and was equally efficacious to TAU or an active control group in two studies. Overall, studies showed medium effect sizes. Among other limitations are lack of active control group and long-term follow-up in several studies.   Evidence supports that MBSR improves mental health and MBCT prevents depressive relapse. Future RCTs should apply optimal design including active treatment for comparison, properly trained instructors and at least one-year follow-up. Future research should primarily tackle the question of whether mindfulness itself is a decisive ingredient by controlling against other active control conditions or true treatments. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Empirical validation and psychometric evaluation of the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale in patients with social anxiety disorder.

            The Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE; M. R. Leary, 1983a) is often used to assess fear of negative evaluation, the core feature of social anxiety disorder. However, few studies have examined its psychometric properties in large samples of socially anxious patients. Although the BFNE yields a single total score, confirmatory factor analysis indicated a 2-factor solution to be more appropriate, with the 1st factor consisting of all straightforwardly worded items (BFNE-S) and the 2nd of all reverse-scored items (BFNE-R). Support was obtained for the convergent and discriminant validity of the BFNE and BFNE-S, but not the BFNE-R. These results suggest that standard scoring of the BFNE may not be optimal for patients with social anxiety disorder.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              More information from fewer questions: the factor structure and item properties of the original and brief fear of negative evaluation scale.

              Statistical methods designed for categorical data were used to perform confirmatory factor analyses and item response theory (IRT) analyses of the Fear of Negative Evaluation scale (FNE; D. Watson & R. Friend, 1969) and the Brief FNE (BFNE; M. R. Leary, 1983). Results suggested that a 2-factor model fit the data better for both the FNE and the BFNE, although the evidence was less strong for the FNE. The IRT analyses indicated that although both measures had items with good discrimination, the FNE items discriminated only at lower levels of the underlying construct, whereas the BFNE items discriminated across a wider range. Convergent validity analyses indicated that the straightforwardly-worded items on each scale had significantly stronger relationships with theoretically related measures than did the reverse-worded items. On the basis of all analyses, usage of the straightforwardly-worded BFNE factor is recommended for the assessment of fear of negative evaluation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kmontgomery1@sheffield.ac.uk
                Journal
                Br J Dermatol
                Br. J. Dermatol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2133
                BJD
                The British Journal of Dermatology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0007-0963
                1365-2133
                18 September 2016
                November 2016
                : 175
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1111/bjd.2016.175.issue-5 )
                : 930-936
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of PsychologyUniversity of Sheffield Western Bank Sheffield S10 2TPU.K.
                [ 2 ] Department of DermatologyRoyal Hallamshire Hospital SheffieldU.K.
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Kerry Montgomery.

                E‐mail: kmontgomery1@ 123456sheffield.ac.uk

                Article
                BJD14719
                10.1111/bjd.14719
                5091630
                27169607
                dae025ce-d93b-4460-91bc-0dc83a3b40a4
                © 2016 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 03 May 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Pages: 7, Words: 5724
                Funding
                Funded by: Economic and Social Research Council
                Award ID: ES/J00215/1
                Categories
                Qualitative Research
                Original Articles
                Qualitative Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                bjd14719
                November 2016
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:4.9.6 mode:remove_FC converted:02.11.2016

                Dermatology
                Dermatology

                Comments

                Comment on this article