5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Barriers to outpatient education for medical students: a narrative review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          This study surveys medical education literature published over the last 25 years (1993–2018) to identify the factors scholars consider deleterious to outpatient teaching for medical students.

          Methods

          This study conducts a review of medical education literature published between 1993 and 2018 using Medline, Lilacs, Ibecs, Cochrane Library, and Scielo databases. The following search terms were utilized: “Education, Medical, Undergraduate” AND “Ambulatory Care” AND “Teaching/methods” OR “Clinical Clerkship” OR “Preceptorship.” This study focuses on papers describing deleterious factors for outpatient teaching with medical students and analyzes their results, discussions, and conclusions sections.

          Results

          Of the 363 articles obtained, this study selected 33 for analysis. These papers identify numerous factors as barriers to outpatient education. For didactic purposes, these factors are categorized into four barrier groups: environment-institution, academic staff, students, and patients. Academic staff-related teaching barrier was the most frequently mentioned obstacle. Intense care schedule with little teaching time was considered the most common and relevant barrier to outpatient medical education, followed by inappropriate teaching environment and inadequate supervision model. 

          Conclusions

          There is a lack of recent literature on studies focusing on barriers to effective outpatient medical education. Factors identified as harmful to outpatient education have been pointed out by course directors, academic staff, and students in the literature. However, many of these factors remain overlooked by educators, who can use these factors to modify their academic activities for more effective results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: a thematic review of the literature.

          A thematic review was conducted of the 1980-1994 research literature on teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings for both undergraduate and graduate medical education. Included in the review were 101 data-based research articles, along with other articles containing helpful recommendations for improving ambulatory education. The studies suggest that education in ambulatory care clinics is characterized by variability, unpredictability, immediacy, and lack of continuity. Learners often see a narrow range of patient problems in a single clinic and experience limited continuity of care. Few cases are discussed with attending physicians and even fewer are examined by them. Case discussions are short in duration, involve little teaching, and provide virtually no feedback. Excellent teachers are described as physician role models, effective supervisors, dynamic teachers, and supportive persons. Rather than block rotations, students and residents prefer longitudinal teaching programs, which offer continuity-of-care experiences with patients and preceptors. Although little can be concluded about learning outcomes, the studies indicate that some medical students and residents have deficient skills in interviewing, physical examination, and management of psychosocial issues. Based on the reviewed studies, the author recommends facilitating learning by increasing continuity-of-patient-care experiences and contact with faculty members, encouraging collaborative and self-directed learning, providing faculty development, and strengthening assessment and feedback procedures. The author also recommends further research to learn about medical specialties other than internal medicine and family medicine, to describe the knowledge and reasoning of both teachers and learners, and to assess the influences of various educational programs on learning and satisfaction.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Strategic planning in medical education: enhancing the learning environment for students in clinical settings.

            The 1999 Cambridge Conference was held in Northern Queensland, Australia, on the theme of clinical teaching and learning. It provided an opportunity for groups of academic medical educators to consider some of the challenges posed by recent changes to health care delivery and medical education across a number of countries. This paper describes the issues raised by the practical challenges posed by the current environment and how they might be addressed in ways that could promote more effective learning in clinical settings. A SWOT analysis is a tool that can help in forward planning by identifying the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats presented by any situation. Our SWOT analysis was used to generate a list of items, from which we chose those most feasible and most likely to promote positive change. Twenty different issues were identified, with four of them chosen by consensus for further elaboration. The discussion gave rise to four main recommended strategies: ensuring that clinical teachers thoroughly understand the purpose and process of learning in clinical settings; equipping learners with 'survival skills'; making the best use of learning resources within different clinical environments and making judicious use of information technology to enhance learning efficiency. The four strategies were selected not only because of their inherent importance, but also because of their feasibility. Modest changes can motivate students to feel part of a clinical team and a 'community of practice' and enhance their capacity for self-regulated practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Using SNAPPS to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning and uncertainties: a randomized comparison group trial.

              When medical students present cases to preceptors, they focus mainly on factual information and reveal little about their diagnostic reasoning or uncertainties. Do third-year students using the six-step, learner-centered SNAPPS technique (Summarize history and findings, Narrow the differential; Analyze the differential; Probe preceptor about uncertainties; Plan management; Select case-related issues for self-study) for case presentations to family medicine ambulatory care preceptors express clinical reasoning and learning issues more than students not trained in the technique? The authors conducted a posttest-only, comparison groups, randomized trial in 2004-2005 with 64 students in three groups: SNAPPS training, feedback training (controlling for training time), and usual-and-customary instruction. SNAPPS training combined brief faculty development with more extensive learner development followed by practice during a four-week family medicine rotation. During the last week, students audiotaped case presentations, which the authors coded for 10 dependent variables organized into six outcome categories that measure expression of clinical diagnostic reasoning and learning issues. The authors coded 66 SNAPPS, 67 comparison, and 82 usual-and-customary case presentations. Students in the SNAPPS group outperformed students in comparison and usual-and-customary groups for each outcome category. SNAPPS presentations were no longer than usual presentations but were one minute longer than those of the comparison group. SNAPPS greatly facilitates and enhances expression of diagnostic reasoning and uncertainties during case presentations to ambulatory care preceptors. Students can conduct case presentations using a technique that makes each step explicit and gives learners, rather than preceptors, the responsibility for expressing their clinical reasoning and uncertainties.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Med Educ
                Int J Med Educ
                IJME
                International Journal of Medical Education
                IJME
                2042-6372
                27 September 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 180-190
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual (IAMSPE), Pós Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Brazil
                [2 ]Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul USCS, Curso de Medicina, Campus Bela Vista, Brazil
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Ricardo Luiz Oliveira Franco, Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual (IAMSPE), Pós Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Brazil. Email: rlof2001@ 123456hotmail.com
                Article
                10-180190
                10.5116/ijme.5d76.32c5
                6773369
                31562805
                d92975f4-d7da-42bf-8ce1-b524fec426fa
                Copyright: © 2019 Ricardo Luiz Oliveira Franco et al.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use of work provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

                History
                : 09 September 2019
                : 04 April 2019
                Categories
                Review Literature
                Outpatient Education

                education,medical,undergraduate,ambulatory care,teaching methods,clinical clerkship,preceptorship

                Comments

                Comment on this article