19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Quality of the documentation of the Nursing process in clinical decision support systems* Translated title: Qualidade da documentao do processo de enfermagem em sistemas de apoio deciso clnica Translated title: Calidad de la documentacin del proceso de Enfermera en sistemas de apoyo a la decisin clnica

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 1 , 2
      Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
      Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeiro Preto / Universidade de So Paulo
      Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Nursing Process, Standardized Nursing Terminology, Electronic Health Records, Nursing Informatics, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Sistemas de Apoio a Decises Clnicas, Processo de Enfermagem, Terminologia Padronizada em Enfermagem, Registro Eletrnico em Sade, Informtica em Enfermagem, Avaliao de Tecnologias de Sade, Sistemas de Apoyo de Decisiones, Clnicos, Proceso de Enfermera, Terminologa Normalizada de Enfermera, Registros Electrnicos de Salud, Informtica Aplicada a la Enfermera, Evaluacin de la Tecnologa Biomdica

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          to compare the quality of the Nursing process documentation in two versions of a clinical decision support system.

          Method:

          a quantitative and quasi-experimental study of the before-and-after type. The instrument used to measure the quality of the records was the Brazilian version of the Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes , which has four domains and a maximum score of 58 points. A total of 81 records were evaluated in version I (pre-intervention), as well as 58 records in version II (post-intervention), and the scores obtained in the two applications were compared. The interventions consisted of planning, pilot implementation of version II of the system, training and monitoring of users. The data were analyzed in the R software, using descriptive and inferential statistics.

          Results:

          the mean obtained at the pre-intervention moment was 38.24 and, after the intervention, 46.35 points. There was evidence of statistical difference between the means of the pre- and post-intervention groups, since the p-value was below 0.001 in the four domains evaluated.

          Conclusion:

          the quality of the documentation of the Nursing process in version II of the system was superior to version I. The efficacy of the system and the effectiveness of the interventions were verified. This study can contribute to the quality of documentation, care management, visibility of nursing actions and patient safety.

          Translated abstract

          Objetivo:

          comparar a qualidade da documentao do processo de enfermagem em duas verses de um sistema de apoio deciso clnica.

          Mtodo:

          estudo quantitativo, quase-experimental do tipo antes e depois. O instrumento utilizado para mensurar a qualidade dos registros foi o Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes Verso Brasileira, que possui quatro domnios e escore mximo de 58 pontos. Foram avaliados 81 registros na verso I (pr-interveno), 58 registros da verso II (ps-interveno) e comparados os escores obtidos nas duas aplicaes. As intervenes consistiram em planejamento, implantao piloto da verso II do sistema, treinamento e acompanhamento dos usurios. Os dados foram analisados no software R, utilizando-se estatstica descritiva e inferencial.

          Resultados:

          a mdia obtida na pr-interveno foi de 38,24 e ps-interveno, 46,35 pontos. Houve evidncias de diferena estatstica entre as mdias dos grupos pr e ps-interveno, visto que o valor-p foi menor que 0,001 nos quatro domnios avaliados.

          Concluso:

          a qualidade da documentao do processo de enfermagem na verso II do sistema foi superior verso I. A eficcia do sistema e a efetividade das intervenes foram comprovadas. Este estudo pode contribuir para a qualidade da documentao, gerenciamento do cuidado, visibilidade das aes de enfermagem e segurana do paciente.

          Translated abstract

          Objetivo:

          comparar la calidad de la documentacin del proceso de Enfermera en dos versiones de un sistema de apoyo a la decisin clnica.

          Mtodo:

          estudio cuantitativo y cuasi-experimental del tipo antes y despus. El instrumento que se us para medir la calidad de los registros fue la versin brasilea del Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes , que contiene cuatro dominios y puntaje mximo de 58 puntos. Se evaluaron 81 registros en la versin I (pre-intervencin), 58 registros de la versin II (post-intervencin) y se compararon las puntuaciones logradas en las dos aplicaciones. Las intervenciones consistieron en planificar, implementar de forma piloto la versin II del sistema, entrenar y realizar un seguimiento a los usuarios. Los datos se analizaron en el software R, utilizando estadstica descriptiva e inferencial.

          Resultados:

          el promedio obtenido en el momento pre-intervencin fue de 38,24 y en la post-intervencin fue de 46,35 puntos. Se registraron evidencias de diferencia estadstica entre los promedios de los grupos pre- y post-intervencin, visto que el valor-p fue menor que 0,001 en los cuatro dominios evaluados.

          Conclusin:

          la calidad de la documentacin del proceso de Enfermera en la versin II del sistema fue superior a la versin I. Se comprob la eficacia del sistema y la efectividad de las intervenciones. Este estudio pudo contribuir para la calidad de la documentacin, gerenciamiento de la atencin, visibilidad de las acciones de Enfermera y seguridad del paciente.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Quality of nursing documentation and approaches to its evaluation: a mixed-method systematic review.

          This paper reports a review that identified and synthesized nursing documentation audit studies, with a focus on exploring audit approaches, identifying audit instruments and describing the quality status of nursing documentation. Quality nursing documentation promotes effective communication between caregivers, which facilitates continuity and individuality of care. The quality of nursing documentation has been measured by using various audit instruments, which reflected variations in the perception of documentation quality among researchers across countries and settings. Searches were made of seven electronic databases. The keywords 'nursing documentation', 'audit', 'evaluation', 'quality', both singly and in combination, were used to identify articles published in English between 2000 and 2010. A mixed-method systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies concerning nursing documentation audit and reports of audit instrument development was undertaken. Relevant data were extracted and a narrative synthesis was conducted. Seventy-seven publications were included. Audit approaches focused on three natural dimensions of nursing documentation: structure or format, process and content. Numerous audit instruments were identified and their psychometric properties were described. Flaws of nursing documentation were identified and the effects of study interventions on its quality. Research should pay more attention to the accuracy of nursing documentation, factors leading to variation in practice and flaws in documentation quality and the effects of these on nursing practice and patient outcomes, and the evaluation of quality measurement. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Quality of nursing documentation: Paper-based health records versus electronic-based health records

            To assess and compare the quality of paper-based and electronic-based health records. The comparison examined three criteria: content, documentation process and structure.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes - application and impact on nursing practice: systematic review.

              This paper reports a systematic review on the outcomes of nursing diagnostics. Specifically, it examines effects on documentation of assessment quality; frequency, accuracy and completeness of nursing diagnoses; and on coherence between nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes. Escalating healthcare costs demand the measurement of nursing's contribution to care. Use of standardized terminologies facilitates this measurement. Although several studies have evaluated nursing diagnosis documentation and their relationship with interventions and outcomes, a systematic review has not been carried out. A Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane Database search (1982-2004) was conducted and enhanced by the addition of primary source and conference proceeding articles. Inclusion criteria were established and applied. Thirty-six articles were selected and subjected to thematic content analysis; each study was then assessed, and a level of evidence and grades of recommendations assigned. Nursing diagnosis use improved the quality of documented patient assessments (n = 14 studies), identification of commonly occurring diagnoses within similar settings (n = 10), and coherence among nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes (n = 8). Four studies employed a continuing education intervention and found statistically significant improvements in the documentation of diagnoses, interventions and outcomes. However, limitations in diagnostic accuracy, reporting of signs/symptoms, and aetiology were also reported (14 studies). One meta-analysis of eight trials including 1497 patients showed no evidence that standardized electronic documentation of nursing diagnosis and related interventions led to better nursing outcomes. Despite variable results, the trend indicated that nursing diagnostics improved assessment documentation, the quality of interventions reported, and outcomes attained. The study reveals deficits in reporting of signs/symptoms and aetiology. Consequently, staff educational measures to enhance diagnostic accuracy are recommended. The relationships among diagnoses, interventions and outcomes require further evaluation. Studies are needed to determine the relationship between the quality of documentation and practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Rev Lat Am Enfermagem
                Rev Lat Am Enfermagem
                rlae
                Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
                Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeiro Preto / Universidade de So Paulo
                0104-1169
                1518-8345
                21 May 2021
                2021
                : 29
                : e3426
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Universidade de So Paulo, Hospital Universitrio, So Paulo, SP, Brazil.
                [2 ]Universidade de So Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem, So Paulo, SP, Brazil.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Neurilene Batista de Oliveira E-mail: neurilenebatista@ 123456yahoo.com.br https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8552-939X

                Authors Contribution:

                Study concept and design: Neurilene Batista de Oliveira, Helosa Helena Ciqueto Peres. Obtaining data: Neurilene Batista de Oliveira. Data analysis and interpretation: Neurilene Batista de Oliveira, Helosa Helena Ciqueto Peres. Drafting the manuscript: Neurilene Batista de Oliveira, Helosa Helena Ciqueto Peres. Critical review of the manuscript as to its relevant intellectual content: Helosa Helena Ciqueto Peres.

                All authors approved the final version of the text.

                Conflict of interest: the authors have declared that there is no conflict of interest.

                Associate Editor: Maria Lcia Zanetti

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8552-939X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8759-5670
                Article
                00324
                10.1590/1518-8345.4510.3426
                8139382
                34037121
                d6753df8-8f37-44a4-976c-25332ab20116
                Copyright 2020 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 May 2020
                : 27 August 2020
                Categories
                Original Article

                decision support systems, clinical,nursing process,standardized nursing terminology,electronic health records,nursing informatics,technology assessment, biomedical,sistemas de apoio a decises clnicas,processo de enfermagem,terminologia padronizada em enfermagem,registro eletrnico em sade,informtica em enfermagem,avaliao de tecnologias de sade,sistemas de apoyo de decisiones, clnicos,proceso de enfermera,terminologa normalizada de enfermera,registros electrnicos de salud,informtica aplicada a la enfermera,evaluacin de la tecnologa biomdica

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content314

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors289