2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of Relative Risk for Sexual and Violent Recidivism With Risk Matrix 2000

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Risk Matrix 2000’s ability to assess relative risk for sexual and violent recidivism has been well established through meta-analysis. However, the instrument was originally designed for use in the United Kingdom and has not been widely tested in other parts of Europe, raising questions about how generalizable the results are. This paper assessed the instrument’s ability to assess relative risk for these outcomes in a sample of over 300 Austrian adult males serving a prison sentence for a sexual offense for whom 5-year rates of sexual and violent recidivism were available. Results indicated an ability to assess relative risk that was comparable to that observed in the United Kingdom. In the context of previous results from Germany, the findings of the present study indicate that Risk Matrix 2000 may be appropriately applied in Europe. Analyses explored the added value of using the Sexual and Violence risk scales in conjunction to identify the kinds of criminogenic need that should be addressed in treatment and supervision.

          Abstract

          • The Risk Matrix 2000 S-scale assessed relative risk for sexual recidivism as well in Austria as it has in the United Kingdom where it was developed.

          • The Risk Matrix 2000 C-scale assessed relative risk for violence (including contact sex offending) as well in Austria as it has in the United Kingdom where it was developed.

          • Considered together, the Risk Matrix S and V scales can suggest whether individuals with a history of sexual offending should be prioritized for sex offense specific treatment or whether targeting more general criminogenic needs should be prioritized.

          • Taken with previous research in Germany, this suggests that Risk Matrix 2000 can appropriately be used to assess relative risk for sexual and violent recidivism in Europe.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluating the yield of medical tests.

          A method is presented for evaluating the amount of information a medical test provides about individual patients. Emphasis is placed on the role of a test in the evaluation of patients with a chronic disease. In this context, the yield of a test is best interpreted by analyzing the prognostic information it furnishes. Information from the history, physical examination, and routine procedures should be used in assessing the yield of a new test. As an example, the method is applied to the use of the treadmill exercise test in evaluating the prognosis of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The treadmill test is shown to provide surprisingly little prognostic information beyond that obtained from basic clinical measurements.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: a comparison of three actuarial scales.

            The study compared the predictive accuracy of three sex offender risk-assessment measures: the RRASOR (Hanson, 1997), Thornton's SACJ-Min (Grubin, 1998), and a new scale, Static-99, created by combining the items from the RRASOR and SACJ-Min. Predictive accuracy was tested using four diverse datasets drawn from Canada and the United Kingdom (total n = 1301). The RRASOR and the SACJ-Min showed roughly equivalent predictive accuracy, and the combination of the two scales was more accurate than either original scale. Static-99 showed moderate predictive accuracy for both sexual recidivism (r = 0.33, ROC area = 0.71) and violent (including sexual) recidivism (r = 0.32, ROC area = 0.69). The variation in the predictive accuracy of Static-99 across the four samples was no more than would be expected by chance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Improving the Predictive Accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 With Older Sex Offenders

              Actuarial risk assessment scales and their associated recidivism estimates are generally developed on samples of offenders whose average age is well below 50 years. Criminal behavior of all types declines with age; consequently, actuarial scales tend to overestimate recidivism for older offenders. The current study aimed to develop a revised scoring system for two risk assessment tools (Static-99 and Static-2002) that would more accurately describe older offenders' risk of recidivism. Using data from 8,390 sex offenders derived from 24 separate samples, age was found to add incremental predictive validity to both Static-99 and Static-2002. After creating new age weights, the resulting instruments (Static-99R and Static-2002R) had only slightly higher relative predictive accuracy. The absolute recidivism estimates, however, provided a substantially better fit for older offenders than the recidivism estimates from the original scales. We encourage evaluators to adopt the revised scales with the new age weights.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                SOTRAP
                Sex Offending
                Sexual Offending: Theory, Research, and Prevention
                Sex. Offending
                PsychOpen
                2699-8440
                22 July 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 1
                : e3129
                Affiliations
                [a ]FAsTR LLC, Madison, WI, USA
                [b ]Federal Evaluation Centre for Violent and Sexual Offenders (FECVSO), Ministry of Justice , Vienna, Austria
                [c ]Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center, Mauston, WI, USA
                [4]Centre for Criminology (Kriminologische Zentralstelle – KrimZ), Wiesbaden, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]FAsTR LLC, 1213 N Sherman Avenue Suite 334, Madison, WI 53704, United States. davidsmthornton@ 123456icloud.com
                Article
                sotrap.3129
                10.5964/sotrap.3129
                d66f1803-a5d1-4c6e-9d11-255a37c34f22
                Copyright @ 2020

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 March 2020
                : 10 April 2020
                Categories
                Research Article

                Psychology
                RM2000,sexual recidivism,actuarial risk assessment
                Psychology
                RM2000, sexual recidivism, actuarial risk assessment

                Comments

                Comment on this article