13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy combining aspirin with a P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor is a therapeutic mainstay for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the optimal choice of P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor in elderly (aged ≥65 years) patients remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in elderly patients with ACS. Methods: We comprehensively searched in Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases through 29 th March, 2021 for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor or clopidogrel plus aspirin in elderly patients with ACS. Four studies were included in the final analysis. A fixed effects model or random effects model was applied to analyze risk ratios (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) across studies, and I 2 to assess heterogeneity.

          Results: A total number of 4429 elderly patients with ACS were included in this analysis, of whom 2170 (49.0%) patients received aspirin plus ticagrelor and 2259 (51.0%) received aspirin plus clopidogrel. The ticagrelor group showed a significant advantage over the clopidogrel group concerning all-cause mortality (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63–0.96, I 2 = 0%; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.95, I 2 = 0%) and cardiovascular death (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56–0.91, I 2 = 0%; RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62–0.94, I 2 = 5%) but owned a higher risk of PLATO major or minor bleeding (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.13–1.89, I 2 = 0%; RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.11–1.76, I 2 = 0%). Both the groups showed no significant difference regarding major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.68–1.65, I 2 = 77%; RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.69–1.58, I 2 = 77%).

          Conclusion: For elderly ACS patients, aspirin plus ticagrelor reduces cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality but increases the risk of bleeding. Herein, aspirin plus ticagrelor may extend lifetime for elderly ACS patients compared with aspirin plus clopidogrel. The optimal DAPT for elderly ACS patients may be a valuable direction for future research studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            OUP accepted manuscript

            (2020)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pharmacol
                Front Pharmacol
                Front. Pharmacol.
                Frontiers in Pharmacology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-9812
                18 October 2021
                2021
                18 October 2021
                : 12
                : 743259
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
                [ 2 ]Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
                [ 3 ]Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Institute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine of Shandong University, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
                [ 4 ]Key Laboratory of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine of Shandong Province, Key Laboratory of Cardiopulmonary-Cerebral Resuscitation Research of Shandong Province, Shandong Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
                [ 5 ]The Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Chinese Ministry of Education, Chinese Ministry of Health and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, The State and Shandong Province Joint Key Laboratory of Translational Cardiovascular Medicine, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Luciane Cruz Lopes, University of Sorocaba, Brazil

                Reviewed by: Fathi M. Sherif, University of Tripoli, Libya

                Kyeong Ho Yun, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University, South Korea

                *Correspondence: Feng Xu, xufengsdu@ 123456126.com ; Yuguo Chen, chen919085@ 123456sdu.edu.cn
                [ † ]

                These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

                This article was submitted to Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

                Article
                743259
                10.3389/fphar.2021.743259
                8552409
                34721032
                d5d4b75e-53de-4ff3-bfed-1eac46a02a5b
                Copyright © 2021 Zhao, Zhang, Guo, Wang, Pan, Zhao, Sang, Yang, Xu, Xu and Chen.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 18 July 2021
                : 14 September 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Shandong University , doi 10.13039/100009108;
                Award ID: 2020QNQT004 2018JC011
                Funded by: Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province , doi 10.13039/100012620;
                Award ID: tsqn20161065 tspd20181220 tsqn201812129
                Categories
                Pharmacology
                Systematic Review

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                elderly patients,ticagrelor,clopidogrel,acute coronary syndrome,meta-analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article