76
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Risk factors and outcome of pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients– a multinational observational study by the European Confederation of Medical Mycology

      research-article
      1 , § , 2 , ∗∗ , § , 3 , 4 , § , 5 , 6 , 2 , 7 , 7 , 8 , 8 , 9 , 9 , 10 , 5 , 6 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 3 , 4 , 10 , # , 16 , # , 5 , # , 2 , # , 1 , 17 , 18 , , # , for the ECMM-CAPA Study Group*
      Clinical Microbiology and Infection
      European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
      Aspergillus, CAPA, COVID-19, ICU, Survival

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) has emerged as a complication in critically ill COVID-19 patients. The objectives of this multinational study were to determine the prevalence of CAPA in patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units (ICU) and to investigate risk factors for CAPA as well as outcome.

          Methods

          The European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) conducted a multinational study including 20 centers from nine different countries to assess epidemiology, risk factors, and outcome of CAPA. CAPA was defined according to the 2020 ECMM/ISHAM consensus definitions.

          Results

          A total of 592 patients were included in this study, including 11 (1.9%) patients with histologically proven CAPA, 80 (13.5%) patients with probable CAPA, 18 (3%) with possible CAPA and 483 (81.6%) without CAPA. CAPA was diagnosed a median of 8 days (range 0-31) after ICU admission predominantly in older patients [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.04 per year; 95%CI 1.02-1.06] with any form of invasive respiratory support (HR 3.4; 95%CI 1.84-6.25) and receiving tocilizumab (HR 2.45; 95%CI 1.41-4.25). Median prevalence of CAPA per center was 10.7% (range 1.7%-26.8%). CAPA was associated with significantly lower 90-day ICU survival rate (29% in patients with CAPA versus 57% in patients without CAPA; Mantel-Byar p<0.001) and remained an independent negative prognostic variable after adjusting for other predictors of survival (HR=2.14; 95%CI: 1.59-2.87, p<=0.001).

          Conclusion

          Prevalence of CAPA varied between centers. CAPA was significantly more prevalent among older patients, patients receiving invasive ventilation and patients receiving tocilizumab, and was an independent strong predictor of ICU mortality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19 — Preliminary Report

          Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is associated with diffuse lung damage. Glucocorticoids may modulate inflammation-mediated lung injury and thereby reduce progression to respiratory failure and death. Methods In this controlled, open-label trial comparing a range of possible treatments in patients who were hospitalized with Covid-19, we randomly assigned patients to receive oral or intravenous dexamethasone (at a dose of 6 mg once daily) for up to 10 days or to receive usual care alone. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Here, we report the preliminary results of this comparison. Results A total of 2104 patients were assigned to receive dexamethasone and 4321 to receive usual care. Overall, 482 patients (22.9%) in the dexamethasone group and 1110 patients (25.7%) in the usual care group died within 28 days after randomization (age-adjusted rate ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 0.93; P<0.001). The proportional and absolute between-group differences in mortality varied considerably according to the level of respiratory support that the patients were receiving at the time of randomization. In the dexamethasone group, the incidence of death was lower than that in the usual care group among patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (29.3% vs. 41.4%; rate ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.81) and among those receiving oxygen without invasive mechanical ventilation (23.3% vs. 26.2%; rate ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94) but not among those who were receiving no respiratory support at randomization (17.8% vs. 14.0%; rate ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.55). Conclusions In patients hospitalized with Covid-19, the use of dexamethasone resulted in lower 28-day mortality among those who were receiving either invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen alone at randomization but not among those receiving no respiratory support. (Funded by the Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research and others; RECOVERY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04381936; ISRCTN number, 50189673.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence of putative invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19

            About 5% of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) require intensive care unit (ICU) management. 1 These patients are at high risk of developing secondary infections including invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). 2 First reported with H1N1 influenza, IPA represents a frequent (20–30%) and early-onset complication (median, 3 days post-ICU admission) in critically ill patients with influenza, leading to enhanced illness severity and mortality (40–60%).3, 4 Most cases have been observed in non-immunocompromised patients, questioning the applicability of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Mycoses Study Group (EORTC-MSG) consensus criteria used to define aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients. 5 Therefore, an algorithm to discriminate Aspergillus spp colonisation from putative IPA was developed for patients in ICU on the basis of mycological criteria combining culture from respiratory specimens and galactomannan detection in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and serum.4, 6 Parallelling what has been reported in influenza patients, we designed this prospective observational study to investigate IPA risk in critically ill patients with COVID-19. The patients were classified by means of the EORTC-MSG criteria 5 (if immunocompromised) or the influenza-associated IPA criteria 4 combined with serum β-D-glucan and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) 7 done in the serum or pulmonary specimens (if non-immunocompromised). Putative IPA was considered if Aspergillus spp were identified in BAL culture; or if two of the following conditions were met (ie, presence of Aspergillus spp in bronchial aspiration [BA] culture; positive Aspergillus fumigatus qPCR in BAL, BA, or serum; 8 galactomannan index >0·8 in BAL; 5 galactomannan index >0·5 in serum; and β-D-glucan >80 pg/mL in serum). 27 successive mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 (18 male and nine female, median age 63 years [IQR 56-71]) were included. Specimens (20 BALs and seven BAs) were obtained on day 3 [IQR 1–6] post-intubation. Probable IPAs were diagnosed in one patient (4%) and putative IPAs were diagnosed in eight patients (30%; table ). Putative IPA diagnosis relied on Aspergillus spp identification in BAL culture (n=2) and validation of 2 or more mycological criteria (n=6). Table Clinical characteristics of nine critically ill patients with COVID-19 probable (n=1) and putative invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (n=8) Putative invasive pulmonary aspergillosis patients (sex, age) Probable IPA patient (sex, age) Patient 1 (male, 53 years) Patient 2 (female, 59 years) Patient3 (female, 69 years) Patient 4 (female, 63 years) Patient 5 (male, 43 years) Patient 6 (male, 79 years) Patient 7 (male, 77 years) Patient 8 (female, 75 years) Patient 9 (male, 47 years) Risk factors of severe COVID-19 Hypertension, obesity, ischaemic heart disease Hypertension, diabetes, obesity Hypertension, obesity Hypertension, diabetes, ischaemic heart disease Asthma Hypertension Hypertension, asthma Hypertension, diabetes None EORTC risk factors None None None None Steroids None None None Myeloma, steroids APACHE II score 26 16 11 20 8 16 25 21 10 Thoracic CT-scan/x-ray* Typical COVID-19 Typical COVID-19 Typical COVID-19 Typical COVID-19 Typical COVID-19 Typical COVID-19, segmental lung atelectasis Typical COVID-19, emphysema Typical COVID-19 Typical COVID-19 + one peripheral nodule Anti-COVID-19 therapies LPV–RTV LPV–RTV, AZI LPV–RTV LPV–RTV AZI LPV–RTV, HCQ, AZI LPV–RTV, HCQ, AZI LPV–RTV, AZI No Steroids to treat pneumonia† Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Renal replacement therapy Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Vasopressor Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Pulmonary specimen‡ BAL BAL BA BAL BAL BAL BAL BAL BA Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis diagnosis BAL culture§ − + + − + + + + + BAL/BA qPCR¶ − − 23·9 − − 34·5 29·0 31·7 − BAL galactomannan index 0·89 0·03 ND 0·15 0·12 0·05 3·91 0·36 ND Serum qPCR¶ − − − ND − − − − − β-D-glucan, pg/mL 523 ND 7·8 105 7 23 135 450 14 Serum galactomannan index 0·13 0·04 0·03 0·51 0·04 0·02 0·37 0·37 0·09 Number of mycological criteria 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 3 1 Antifungal therapy None None None None None None VRC CSP None Outcome Alive Alive Alive Death (day 0) Alive Alive Death (day 18) Death (day 11) Death day 3) EORTC=European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. APACHE= Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Enquiry. LPV–RTV=lopnavir–ritonavir combination. AZI=azithromycin. HCQ=hydroxychloroquine. BAL=Bronchoalveolar lavage. BA=bronchial aspiration. ND=not done. VRC=voriconazole. CSP=caspofungin. * Thoracic CT scan was done in Pt3, Pt4, Pt5, 5 days (median) before respiratory specimens. † Dexamethasone intravenous dose of 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10; ‡ No endotracheal or endobronchial lesion was observed. § −=negative; +=positive with Aspergillus fumigatus identification. ¶ qPCR=quantitative real-time PCR (−, negative; if positive, number of quantification cycles). History of hypertension was reported more frequently in the patients with IPA (seven of nine vs six of 18, p=0·046). No other significant differences were observed in terms of age, EORTC-MSG risk factors for IPA, time between onset of symptoms and intubation and time between onset of symptoms or intubation and Aspergillus spp respiratory specimen collection, severity, laboratory data, non-COVID CT-scan images, and steroid administration. Antifungal therapy was initiated in two of nine (22%) patients with IPA. Mortality rate did not differ between IPA and non-IPA patients (four of nine [44%] vs seven of 18 [39%], p=0·99. We found putative IPA in almost one-third of our mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19—a similar prevalence to that observed in patients with influenza.3, 4 One patient with myeloma presented with probable IPA on the basis of EORTC criteria 5 with one nodule on chest x-rays in addition to the typical COVID-19-attributed lesions. Since CT and BAL are extremely difficult to do in patients with life-threatening COVID-19, mycological data collection is essential to allow IPA diagnosis. We strongly support adding β-D-glucan in serum and qPCR in serum and respiratory specimens to the accepted mycological work-up (ie, BAL culture and galactomannan testing)4, 6 until the most sensitive and specific biomarkers are identified in this setting. Serum galactomannan was negative in eight of nine (89%) patients, suggesting a lesser degree of Aspergillus invasiveness or early IPA diagnosis, since respiratory specimens were obtained shortly after intubation. Galactomannan was negative in our two patients receiving hydroxychloroquine, which is thought to have a negative effect on this measurement. 9 We believe that IPA is more probable if at least two mycological criteria are met. However, three patients had Aspergillus fumigatus culture without positive qPCR detection or galactomannan antigen in the BAL or BA. Not considering positive culture alone as a diagnostic criterion in accordance with what is accepted,4, 6 would have resulted in underestimating the frequency of putative IPA (22% rather than 30% in our study). Despite similar IPA prevalence in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and influenza, the contribution of Aspergillus to the patient presentation in each illness might be different. In our patients with IPA, death, including in the two patients who received anti-Aspergillus treatment, was not related to aspergillosis but to bacterial septic shock complicated by multiorgan failure. Consistent with others,10, 11 our findings support systematic screening for Aspergillus infection markers in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Although oseltamivir-induced inhibition of the host neuraminidase activity has been suggested as a possible molecular mechanism leading to decreased anti-Aspergillus protective immunity in patients with influenza, the exact reasons for increased vulnerability of the patients with COVID-19 to Aspergillus remain to be identified as well as the contribution of Aspergillus to COVID-19-related lung inflammation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              COVID-19–associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis

              To the Editor: Late December 2019, China reported an outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This has become a global threat, with high attack rates, ICU admissions, and mortality. Initial cohort studies reported a substantial case fatality rate in patients admitted to the ICU, of whom half developed secondary infections (1). Late February, the Southern Netherlands emerged as a hotspot for COVID-19, and we noticed cases of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) occurring in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU. Here, we describe the clinical characteristics of COVID-19–associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) cases and the frequency in our ICU. In the first 3 weeks of the outbreak, 135 adult patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were admitted to the Amphia Hospital Breda, a 700-bed teaching hospital. Of these patients, 31 (23%) required mechanical ventilation on ICU. Eleven ICU patients with COVID-19 developed a secondary infection, of whom six (19.4%) were presumed to have IPA. We identified Aspergillus fumigatus in five patients, and in three patients, the Aspergillus antigen galactomannan (GM) (Platelia Aspergillus; Biorad) was found positive on BAL fluid (Table 1). Three patients had preexisting lung diseases, but none were positive for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (MSGERC) host factor (2). Three patients received corticosteroids before ICU admission; however, either the dose received was <0.3 mg/kg/d or the duration was <3 weeks. No other immunosuppressive medication was given before CAPA diagnosis, and all were treated for COVID-19 with chloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between ICU patients with COVID-19 with presumed CAPA and those without presumed CAPA (Table 2). CAPA occurred after a median of 11.5 days (range, 8–42) after COVID-19 symptom onset and at a median of 5 days (range, 3–28) after ICU admission. Chest computed tomographic scan was performed in one patient without apparent signs of fungal infection. In one patient, the bronchoscopy was abnormal, with mucoid white sputum in the left bronchus. Serum GM tested negative in three patients. Voriconazole and anidulafungin combination therapy was initiated in five patients, and one patient received liposomal amphotericin B. Four (66.7%) patients died at a median of 12 ICU days (11–20). Autopsies were not performed because of concerns for the risk of contamination. Table 1. Patient Characteristics, Clinical Course, and Outcome Patient Sex and Age in Years Medical History Days after Symptom Onset to CAPA Onset APACHE-II at ICU Admission Days after ICU Admission to CAPA Onset Bronchoscopy Findings Microbiological Findings (Days after Symptom Onset of Sample Acquisition) CAPA Classification (10) Outcome (Days after Symptom Onset) 1 M, 83 Cardiomyopathy; prednisolon 0.13 mg/kg/d for 28 d preadmission 10 16 3 Not performed Tracheal aspirate–cultured Aspergillus fumigatus (7); serum GM index 0.4 (8) Possible Died (12) 2 M, 67 COPD GOLD III; Post-RTx NSCLC 2014; prednisolon 0.37 mg/kg/d for 2 d preadmission 10 16 3 Not performed Tracheal aspirate–cultured Aspergillus fumigatus (5) Possible Died (11) 3 M, 75 COPD GOLD IIa 8 15 5 Mucoid white sputum left bronchus BAL-cultured Aspergillus fumigatus (8); BAL GM index 4.0 (8) Probable Died (12) 4 M, 43 None 21 10 14 Unrevealing BAL GM index 3.8 (18); serum GM index 0.1 (16) Probable Survived 5 M, 57 Bronchial asthma; fluticason 1.94 mcg/kg/d for 1 mo preadmission 13 15 5 Unrevealing BAL-cultured Aspergillus fumigatus (11); BAL GM index 1.6 (11); serum GM index 0.1 (13) Probable Died (20) 6 M, 58 None 42 15 28 Not performed Sputum-cultured Aspergillus fumigatus (36, 40, 43, 47, and 50) Possible Survived Median — — 11.5 15 5 — — — 12 d Definition of abbreviations: APACHE-II = Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; CAPA = COVID-19–associated pulmonary aspergillosis; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COVID-19 = coronavirus disease; GM = galactomannan; GOLD = Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; NSCLC = non–small-cell lung carcinoma; RTx = radiation therapy. Table 2. Characteristics of Patients with versus without CAPA, Clinical Course, and Outcome Parameter Presumed CAPA (n = 6) Non-CAPA (n = 25) P Value Age, yr, median (range) 62.5 (43–83) 67 (16–79) 0.942 Sex, M, n (%) 6/6 (100) 20/25 (80) 0.553 EORTC/MSGERC host risk factors, n (%) 0/6 (0) 3/25 (12) 1 Interval from symptom onset to ICU admission, median (range), d 7 (3–14) 9 (3–15) 0.268 Interval from ICU admission to ICU discharge, median (range), d 10.5 (4–47) 14 (2–42) 1 Interval from symptom onset to death, median (range), d 12 (11–20) 17.5 (9–37) 0.570 Systemic corticosteroid use, n (%) 2/6 (33.3) 3/25 (12) 0.241 BAL performed, n (%) 1/6 (16.7) 6/25 (24) 1 Mortality, n (%) 4/6 (66.7) 8/25 (32) 0.174 Definition of abbreviations: CAPA = COVID-19–associated pulmonary aspergillosis; COVID-19 = coronavirus disease; EORTC = European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; MSGERC = Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. We used the Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher’s exact test to compare differences between patients with and without CAPA when appropriate. Discussion We observed a high incidence (19.4%) of presumed aspergillosis in our cohort of 31 ICU patients, which might indicate that patients with COVID-19 are at risk for developing IPA. Secondary fungal infections are increasingly being reported in patients with COVID-19. Studies from Wuhan, China, reported secondary fungal infections in 3 of 9 (33.3%) patients and in 6 of 17 (35.3%) critically ill patients (3, 4). Subsequent reports from Europe indicate that IPA may be found in association with severe COVID-19. Lescure and colleagues described an ICU patient with COVID-19 with antifungal treatment for A. flavus who died on Day 24 after symptom onset (5). A research letter reports a fatal case of pulmonary aspergillosis coinfection in an immunocompetent patient (6). A case series from France reported presumed CAPA in 9 of 27 (33.3%) ICU patients with COVID-19, and a series from Germany reported CAPA in 5 of 19 (26.3%) ICU patients. All-cause mortality was three of nine (33.3%) in the French CAPA series and four of five (80%) in the German series (7, 8). This high incidence of secondary aspergillosis in COVID-19 cases resembles the high rates (16% and 23%) of influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA) that have been reported in ICUs in the Netherlands and Belgium (9). One problem is that there is no case definition for CAPA. However, a case definition for IAPA was recently proposed by an expert panel, and this could be used to classify patients with CAPA (10). In the IAPA case definition, host factors are not used to classify patients because IAPA may develop in any patient with severe influenza. Diagnostic criteria include proven influenza infection with clinical symptoms and a GM index of ≥1 on BAL or ≥0.5 on serum, or Aspergillus spp. cultured from BAL (10). When we apply the IAPA case definition to our cases, three (Table 1) cases could be classified as probable CAPA on the basis of BAL GM detection. The remaining three patients might classify as possible CAPA, with clinical deterioration and A. fumigatus recovered from tracheal aspirates because bronchoscopy was not performed. However, recovery of Aspergillus from upper respiratory samples may represent colonization and not invasive pulmonary disease. Although 94% of patients with IAPA had positive BAL GM and 71% had positive serum GM in a retrospective ICU study (9), the performance of GM in BAL and serum of patients with CAPA remains to be further evaluated, as it may differ from IAPA. Indeed, in three of our patients with CAPA, circulating GM was not detected in serum. In one patient, the serum GM index was 0.4, which is borderline negative. Including our case series, to date, 22 ICU patients have been reported with presumed CAPA (5–8). Only three patients tested GM-positive in serum. It is important to investigate the diagnostic value of serum GM in CAPA, as there is a general reluctance to perform bronchoscopy in patients with COVID-19 because of the risks for the patient and the pulmonologist. For CAPA, some clinical characteristics are similar to those of IAPA, including early symptom onset after ICU admission, absence of EORTC/MSGERC host factors, and a high ICU mortality. Invasive Aspergillus tracheobronchitis (with plaque formation), which is a common manifestation of IAPA, was, however, not registered in these patients. Three patients were known to have chronic lung disease, which makes differentiation between IPA and Aspergillus colonization challenging. The diagnosis of IAPA has controversies because varying frequencies of the infection have been reported in ICU influenza studies. Geographical differences may explain the observed variations, although differences in diagnostic approaches are also likely to contribute. IAPA may remain undiagnosed because respiratory deterioration is considered to be caused by bacterial coinfection rather than fungal infection, and appropriate fungal diagnostics are not performed (11). SARS-CoV-2 infection might be a risk factor for IPA, and early diagnosis and prompt treatment for CAPA in ICU patients seems warranted because high mortality rates have been reported. In our center, on suspicion of CAPA, a diagnostic workup is performed that includes serum GM and, if feasible, bronchoscopy with BAL for fungal culture and GM. Antifungal therapy is started in patients highly suspected of having CAPA while awaiting results of fungal diagnostics. Until the risk of IPA in severe COVID-19 is better understood, infectious disease specialists, ICU physicians, pulmonologists, and clinical microbiologists should be aware of this secondary infection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Microbiol Infect
                Clin Microbiol Infect
                Clinical Microbiology and Infection
                European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
                1198-743X
                1469-0691
                26 August 2021
                26 August 2021
                Affiliations
                [19 ]Surgical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium
                [20 ]University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, MI
                [21 ]United States, Ann Arbor, USA
                [22 ]Medical Intensive Care Unit, Saint-Louis Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
                [23 ]Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Pneumologie und Infektiologie, Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Zentrum Innere Medizin, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
                [24 ]Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
                [25 ]Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
                [26 ]Medical Universit of Graz, Graz, Austria
                [27 ]LKH Graz II Standort West, Graz, Austria
                [28 ]University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Cologne, Germany
                [29 ]Medical Universtiy of Graz, Graz, Austria
                [30 ]University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
                [31 ]Infectious Disease Department of the Universitiy of Modena, Modena, Italy
                [32 ]Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie Pôle Biologie Anatomie Pathologique CHRU Jean Minjoz - 25030 Besançon, France
                [33 ]Public Health Wales Microbiology Cardiff, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
                [34 ]Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
                [35 ]The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
                [36 ]Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA
                [37 ]The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
                [38 ]Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
                [39 ]A.O.U. San Martino - IST, Istituto Nazionale Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
                [40 ]Mycology-Parasitology Laboratory, Rennes Teaching Hospita, Rennes, France
                [41 ]Innsbruck Medical University, Austria
                [42 ]Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
                [1 ]Medical University of Graz, Department of Infectious Diseases, Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Graz, Austria
                [2 ]Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
                [3 ]San Martino Polyclinic Hospital IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
                [4 ]Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
                [5 ]University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Cologne, Germany
                [6 ]University of Cologne, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Cologne, Germany
                [7 ]Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende, Bruges, Belgium
                [8 ]Ziekenhusnetwerk Antwerp, Campus Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium
                [9 ]Algemeen Ziekenhuis Delta, Roeselare, Belgium
                [10 ]Medical University of Graz, Department of Internal Medicine, Intesive Care Unit, Graz, Austria
                [11 ]Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany
                [12 ]Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
                [13 ]Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, ISERM U1045, Bordeaux, France
                [14 ]Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
                [15 ]Institute of Clinical Hygiene, Medical Microbiology and Infectiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany
                [16 ]Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital; and Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK
                [17 ]Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
                [18 ]Clinical and Translational Fungal-Working Group, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author: . Department of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Graz, Austria AND Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego Tel.: +16195435605.
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author: . Department of General Internal Medicine University Hospitals Leuven Leuven, Belgium
                [§]

                shared first authors.

                [#]

                shared senior authors.

                Article
                S1198-743X(21)00474-2
                10.1016/j.cmi.2021.08.014
                8387556
                34454093
                d5560636-ddc8-4ae9-a829-054501140b0a
                © 2021 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 14 July 2021
                : 12 August 2021
                : 16 August 2021
                Categories
                Original Article

                Microbiology & Virology
                aspergillus,capa,covid-19,icu,survival
                Microbiology & Virology
                aspergillus, capa, covid-19, icu, survival

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content306

                Cited by79

                Most referenced authors650