12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Whoop! There it is: The surprising resurgence of pertussis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite high global vaccine coverage, whooping cough, also known as pertussis, caused by the gram-negative obligate human pathogen Bordetella pertussis (Bp), is resurging worldwide. The inactivated whole cell vaccines (wPV), introduced in the 1940s, were extremely effective in preventing severe disease, controlling the bacterial burden in the entire respiratory tract, and preventing transmission. Because of severe reactogenicity and negative public perceptions regarding safety, wPV were discontinued and acellular subunit (1 to 5 protein components) vaccines adjuvanted with alum (aPV) were introduced in many countries. While safer and effective in disease prevention, these aPVs elicit poor and short-lived immunity and fail to prevent infection [1, 2]. Here, we discuss reasons for pertussis resurgence, bacterial evolution, and limitations of current pertussis vaccines. We also propose new directions to fill existing research gaps and accelerate the development of more effective vaccines. Genotypic and phenotypic variations between vaccine reference and circulating strains of Bp Bp research and vaccine formulations are largely based on Tohama I, a strain isolated in Japan in the 1950s and its derivatives. Recent whole genome sequencing and chromosomal analyses of circulating Bp (cBp) strains changed the prevailing view of Bp as a monomorphic pathogen with small genetic changes and SNPs. Instead, cBp strains represent a dynamic population whose genomes exhibit extensive structural rearrangements including large inversions, duplications, and deletions [3, 4]. Nonetheless, comparative genomics alone cannot sufficiently explain pertussis resurgence. Going forward, it is important to understand how genomic variations in cBp strains lead to alterations in phenotypic and pathogenic properties. Few studies have examined phenotypic differences between the reference and cBp strains. Variations in the amounts of aPV antigens pertactin (Prn), pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (Fha), and fimbriae (Fim2/3) have been observed. Compared to reference strains, cBp strains from several countries isolated subsequent to aPV introduction either fail to produce or produce higher amounts of Prn, Fha, and PT. Strain-specific differences in production of three Fim serotypes have also been observed. These results have led to the hypothesis that due to aPV-induced selection pressure, divergence in aPV antigens is observed at higher rates than in factors not included in aPV [3, 5]. However, whether these genotypic and phenotypic differences result in the reduction of aPV efficacy remains controversial. With respect to non-aPV factors, some cBp strains are less susceptible to complement-mediated killing, a phenotype linked to strain-dependent variations in the expression of Vag8 [6]. Bp reference strains also do not produce the Type III secretion system effector proteins, which are produced in low-passaged and cBp strains [7]. Continued genotypic and phenotypic evaluation of cBp strains and investigation of the mechanisms by which these strains resist and modulate host innate and adaptive immune responses is necessary to comprehensively understand pertussis resurgence. To combat future antigenic divergence, it is important to identify highly conserved and essential antigens produced by cBp strains from multiple countries and include them in next-generation aPV. Determinants of Bp nasal colonization, persistence, and transmission The mechanisms by which Bp persists in the nasopharynx and transmits between humans is poorly studied. Bp forms multicellular aggregates and biofilms on the mouse nasal septum and trachea, which resemble structures present on human tissue explants and respiratory tissues of patients [9]. Compared to reference strains, cBp strains isolated from multiple countries exhibit increased autoaggregation and biofilm formation [9, 10]. These phenotypes are correlated with increased expression and production of biofilm-promoting factors Fha and Bordetella polysaccharide (Bps) and decreased or negligible activity of the biofilm-inhibiting factor adenylate cyclase toxin [10]. Importantly, these strains exhibit increased epithelial cell adherence and bacterial burden on the mouse nasal septum and trachea [10]. Thus, it is likely that cBp strains are evolving to acquire enhanced virulence. We postulate that Bp biofilms are protected from killing by host immune components and thus promote establishment of a chronic carrier state in the nasopharynx. Airborne particles or respiratory droplets are the principal means of Bp transmission. The impact of particle size on Bp transmission is not known. In general, particles less than 10 μm in diameter penetrate deeper into the respiratory tract whereas particles equal to or greater than 10 μm in diameter are deposited onto upper airway surfaces and penetrate poorly into lower pulmonary regions [11]. Bp is relatively small (0.4 to 0.8 μm). Thus, formation of differently sized aerosol particles or droplets either by autoaggregation or by dispersal of established biofilms can result in differences in the extent of transmissibility and infectivity of cBp strains, an area that requires further investigation. A major limitation of aPV is the absence of an antigen with a proven role in colonization of the upper respiratory tract. Bps is the first known factor to promote attachment and efficient colonization of Bp in the mouse nose. It is also essential for biofilm growth and maturation on the mouse nasal septum [8]. Thus, conceptually, a Bps-containing aPV could control bacterial colonization and subsequent transmission. Animal models of immunization and Bp infection Mice serve as excellent models to investigate Bp pathogenesis and vaccine efficacy since they display many parallels to human infections. While mice do not display the human symptoms of cough and leukocytosis, these differences do not significantly affect the aforementioned phenotypic evaluations. However, adult mice do not transmit bacteria [12]. Recently, Bp transmission between neonatal mice was reported [13]. Infection of neonatal mice also recapitulates many aspects of pertussis including the more severe and sometimes fatal disease occurring in human infants [13]. Larger animal models utilized to study Bp include pigs and baboons [12, 14]. Infant and adult baboons infected with Bp experience leukocytosis, cough, and transmit bacteria. While wPV immunization efficiently reduces bacterial burden in the entire respiratory tract of mice and baboons, aPV immunization of mice and baboons clears only the lower respiratory tract. Additionally immunization with wPV but not with aPV prevents transmission in baboons, confirming long-standing epidemiological data in humans [14]. Continued utilization of these animal models will provide insights into the pathogenic consequences of genomic and phenotypic variations in cBp strains. Additionally, the neonatal mouse model will allow testing of next-generation maternal vaccines, while adult mice and baboons will continue to be useful for testing vaccines for infants through adults. Failure of aPV to induce an optimal immune response wPV and natural Bp infection induce optimal and long-lived T helper 1 and T helper 17 (Th1/17)-polarized cellular and humoral immune responses, while aPV primarily elicit Th1/2-polarized and short-duration immune responses. A vigorous ongoing research area is the development and validation of next-generation aPV that elicit Th1/17-polarized responses similar to those induced by wPV and natural infection. These experimental aPV include formulations that contain toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), TLR9, and STING (stimulator of interferon genes) /cGAS (cyclic GMP-AMP synthase) ligands as adjuvants [15]. A live attenuated strain, BPZE1, genetically engineered to remove three Bp toxins, reduced bacterial numbers in the nose, elicited Th1/17 responses and was found to be safe for healthy adults in a Phase I clinical trial [16]. Intranasal delivery of these experimental subunit vaccines or BPZE1 protected mice from Bp challenge at 10 months postimmunization [15, 17]. The long-lived protection was obtained by intranasal but not systemic immunization with these vaccines, suggesting that the mucosal immunization route is more protective than the current regimen of intramuscular vaccine delivery. Natural infection and wPV vaccination induces robust CD4+ tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM) in the respiratory tract that are critical for bacterial clearance, while alum-adjuvanted aPV do not. Intranasal immunization of mice with BPZE1 or an aPV with a Th1/17-inducing combination adjuvant elicits TRM production in the nose and lungs [17, 18]. An important unanswered question is whether aPV-induced protection can be improved and extended for individuals previously immunized with currently commercialized aPV, which includes Th2-skewing alum as the adjuvant. Bordetella Colonization Factor A (BcfA) has been shown to have Th1/17-skewing adjuvant properties. Addition of BcfA to a commercial aPV attenuated the Th2 responses primed by alum and accelerated clearance of Bp from mouse lungs [19], suggesting that a BcfA-containing vaccine may improve the longevity of protection. Thus, a modified vaccine that replaces alum or in combination with a Th1/17-inducing adjuvant delivered intranasally may be the key to long-lived protection and reduced transmission. Current aPV antigens were selected primarily for their ability to induce antibody responses, which, while contributing to bacterial clearance, may not be sufficient or essential. Improving next-generation aPV will also require identification of CD4+ T cell epitopes by bioinformatics and proteomics combined with mass spectrometry [20]. Conclusion and multipronged future directions As described above and summarized in Fig 1, future research must address (1) the phenotypic and pathogenic differences in cBp strains; (2) the failure of aPV to prevent nasopharyngeal colonization of Bp and subsequent transmission, and (3) the suboptimal and short-lived duration of aPV-induced protection. To address these issues, research efforts should prioritize (1) inclusion in the aPV of conserved and essential antigens and those involved in the colonization of nasopharynx; (2) testing the efficacy of mucosal immunization and understanding the underlying vaccine-elicited immunological responses; (2) inclusion of improved Th1/17-skewing adjuvants, and (4) the development and use of in vitro and ex vivo systems that mimic the human respiratory tract environment, thereby improving the understanding of host–pathogen interactions in the context of human disease. Together, these strategies will lead to more effective next-generation vaccines that will protect against this highly contagious human pathogen. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008625.g001 Fig 1 Reasons for and research directions to control pertussis resurgence. Resurgence of aPV is attributed to (A) genotypic and antigenic variation and the differential production of virulence factors between currently circulating strains (CBp) and the reference strains; (B) increased aggregation, biofilm formation, adhesion, and colonization phenotypes of CBp strains; (C) inability to reduce nasopharyngeal colonization; (D) subsequent transmission; and (E) suboptimal immune response induced by alum, an adjuvant in aPV which drives Th2 and antibody responses instead of the Th1/17 responses required for protection of the respiratory tract. (F) Multiple approaches are suggested with the goal of developing novel and more effective next-generation aPV. aPV, acellular pertussis vaccine; Bp, Bordetella pertussis; cBp, circulating Bp.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Sustained protective immunity against Bordetella pertussis nasal colonization by intranasal immunization with a vaccine-adjuvant combination that induces IL-17-secreting TRM cells

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Influenza A virus transmission via respiratory aerosols or droplets as it relates to pandemic potential

            Many respiratory viruses of humans originate from animals. For instance, there are now eight paramyxoviruses, four coronaviruses and four orthomxoviruses that cause recurrent epidemics in humans but were once confined to other hosts. In the last decade, several members of the same virus families have jumped the species barrier from animals to humans. Fortunately, these viruses have not become established in humans, because they lacked the ability of sustained transmission between humans. However, these outbreaks highlighted the lack of understanding of what makes a virus transmissible. In part triggered by the relatively high frequency of occurrence of influenza A virus zoonoses and pandemics, the influenza research community has started to investigate the viral genetic and biological traits that drive virus transmission via aerosols or respiratory droplets between mammals. Here we summarize recent discoveries on the genetic and phenotypic traits required for airborne transmission of zoonotic influenza viruses of subtypes H5, H7 and H9 and pandemic viruses of subtypes H1, H2 and H3. Increased understanding of the determinants and mechanisms of respiratory virus transmission is not only key from a basic scientific perspective, but may also aid in assessing the risks posed by zoonotic viruses to human health, and preparedness for such risks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Immunization with whole cell but not acellular pertussis vaccines primes CD4 T RM cells that sustain protective immunity against nasal colonization with Bordetella pertussis

              ABSTRACT Protective immunity wanes rapidly after immunization of children with acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines and these vaccines do not prevent nasal colonization or transmission of Bordetella pertussis in baboons. In this study, we examined the role of tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells in persistent protective immunity induced by infection or immunization with aP and whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines in mice. Immunization of mice with a wP vaccine protected against lung and nasal colonization, whereas an aP vaccine failed to protect in the nose. IL-17 and IFN-γ-secreting CD69+CD4+ TRM cells were expanded in the lung and nasal tissue after B. pertussis challenge of mice immunized with wP, but not aP vaccines. However, previous infection induced the most persistent protection against nasal colonization and this correlated with potent induction of nasal tissue TRM cells, especially IL-17-secreting TRM cells. Blocking T cell migration to respiratory tissue during immunization with a wP vaccine impaired bacterial clearance, whereas transfer of TRM cells from convalescent or wP-immunized mice conferred protection to naïve mice. Our findings reveal that previous infection or wP vaccination are significantly more effective than aP vaccination in conferring persistent protective immunity against B. pertussis and that this is mediated by respiratory TRM cells.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Pathog
                PLoS Pathog
                plos
                plospath
                PLoS Pathogens
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1553-7366
                1553-7374
                23 July 2020
                July 2020
                : 16
                : 7
                : e1008625
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
                [2 ] Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
                [3 ] Department of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
                University of Massachusetts, Worcester, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8444-6039
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7050-0164
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5454-8421
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6093-8354
                Article
                PPATHOGENS-D-20-00612
                10.1371/journal.ppat.1008625
                7377359
                32702023
                d48bf094-5ad4-43c9-a6b5-3bab61caa06d
                © 2020 Fullen et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Pages: 6
                Funding
                R01AI125560. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Pearls
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Infectious Diseases
                Infectious Disease Control
                Vaccines
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Animal Studies
                Experimental Organism Systems
                Model Organisms
                Mouse Models
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Model Organisms
                Mouse Models
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Animal Studies
                Experimental Organism Systems
                Animal Models
                Mouse Models
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Infectious Diseases
                Bacterial Diseases
                Pertussis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Immunology
                Vaccination and Immunization
                Immunologic Adjuvants
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Immunology
                Vaccination and Immunization
                Immunologic Adjuvants
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Preventive Medicine
                Vaccination and Immunization
                Immunologic Adjuvants
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Immunology
                Immune Response
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Immunology
                Immune Response
                Biology and life sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Primates
                Monkeys
                Old World monkeys
                Baboons
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Educational Status
                Graduates
                Alumni
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Bacteria
                Bordetella
                Bordetella Pertussis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Microbiology
                Medical Microbiology
                Microbial Pathogens
                Bacterial Pathogens
                Bordetella
                Bordetella Pertussis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Pathogens
                Microbial Pathogens
                Bacterial Pathogens
                Bordetella
                Bordetella Pertussis

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article