Comparison of Cochlear Implant Device Fixation-Well Drilling Versus Subperiosteal Pocket. A Cost Effectiveness, Case-Control Study.

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

To compare surgical characteristics and complications between well drilling (WD) and subperiosteal pocket techniques (SPT) for receiver/stimulator (R/S) fixation of cochlear implant (CI), and conduct cost-effectiveness analysis.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Otol Neurotol

Title: Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology

Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

ISSN (Electronic): 1537-4505

ISSN (Print): 1531-7129

Publication date (Electronic): Apr 01 2021

Volume: 42

Issue: 4

Affiliations

[1 ] Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[2 ] Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

[3 ] Department of Health Policy and Management, Columbia University Irving Medical Center.

Article

Publisher Item ID: 00129492-202104000-00009

DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002954

PubMed ID: 33710991

SO-VID: d4268c54-6a4e-47ae-86a9-8f8394220ffd

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Cited by 2

See all cited by