1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exposure to Smoke From Wildfire, Prescribed, and Agricultural Burns Among At‐Risk Populations Across Washington, Oregon, and California

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Wildfires, prescribed burns, and agricultural burns all impact ambient air quality across the Western U.S.; however, little is known about how communities across the region are differentially exposed to smoke from each of these fire types. To address this gap, we quantify smoke exposure stemming from wildfire, prescribed, and agricultural burns across Washington, Oregon, and California from 2014 to 2020 using a fire type‐specific biomass burning emissions inventory and the GEOS‐Chem chemical transport model. We examine fire type‐specific PM 2.5 concentration by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and in relation to the Center for Disease Control's Social Vulnerability Index. Overall, population‐weighted PM 2.5 concentrations are greater from wildfires than from prescribed and from agricultural burns. While we found limited evidence of exposure disparities among sub‐groups across the full study area, we did observe disproportionately higher exposures to wildfire‐specific PM 2.5 exposures among Native communities in all three states and, in California, higher agricultural burn‐specific PM 2.5 exposures among lower socioeconomic groups. We also identified, for all three states, areas of significant spatial clustering of smoke exposures from all fire types and increased social vulnerability. These results provide a first look at the differential contributions of smoke from wildfires, prescribed burns, and agricultural burns to PM 2.5 exposures among demographic subgroups, which can be used to inform more tailored exposure reduction strategies across sources.

          Key Points

          • We examine fire type‐specific smoke PM 2.5 exposures across the Western U.S. from 2014 to 2020

          • PM 2.5 from wildfire is greater than from prescribed and agricultural burns but smoke exposure from each has distinct spatiotemporal patterns

          • We identify local areas where increased fire type‐specific smoke exposure intersects with greater social vulnerability

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Local Indicators of Spatial Association-LISA

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016

            Climate, land use, and other anthropogenic and natural drivers have the potential to influence fire dynamics in many regions. To develop a mechanistic understanding of the changing role of these drivers and their impact on atmospheric composition, long-term fire records are needed that fuse information from different satellite and in situ data streams. Here we describe the fourth version of the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED) and quantify global fire emissions patterns during 1997–2016. The modeling system, based on the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) biogeochemical model, has several modifications from the previous version and uses higher quality input datasets. Significant upgrades include (1) new burned area estimates with contributions from small fires, (2) a revised fuel consumption parameterization optimized using field observations, (3) modifications that improve the representation of fuel consumption in frequently burning landscapes, and (4) fire severity estimates that better represent continental differences in burning processes across boreal regions of North America and Eurasia. The new version has a higher spatial resolution (0.25°) and uses a different set of emission factors that separately resolves trace gas and aerosol emissions from temperate and boreal forest ecosystems. Global mean carbon emissions using the burned area dataset with small fires (GFED4s) were 2.2  ×  10 15  grams of carbon per year (Pg C yr −1 ) during 1997–2016, with a maximum in 1997 (3.0 Pg C yr −1 ) and minimum in 2013 (1.8 Pg C yr −1 ). These estimates were 11 % higher than our previous estimates (GFED3) during 1997–2011, when the two datasets overlapped. This net increase was the result of a substantial increase in burned area (37 %), mostly due to the inclusion of small fires, and a modest decrease in mean fuel consumption (−19 %) to better match estimates from field studies, primarily in savannas and grasslands. For trace gas and aerosol emissions, differences between GFED4s and GFED3 were often larger due to the use of revised emission factors. If small fire burned area was excluded (GFED4 without the s for small fires), average emissions were 1.5 Pg C yr −1 . The addition of small fires had the largest impact on emissions in temperate North America, Central America, Europe, and temperate Asia. This small fire layer carries substantial uncertainties; improving these estimates will require use of new burned area products derived from high-resolution satellite imagery. Our revised dataset provides an internally consistent set of burned area and emissions that may contribute to a better understanding of multi-decadal changes in fire dynamics and their impact on the Earth system. GFED data are available from http://www.globalfiredata.org .
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Critical Review of Health Impacts of Wildfire Smoke Exposure

              Background: Wildfire activity is predicted to increase in many parts of the world due to changes in temperature and precipitation patterns from global climate change. Wildfire smoke contains numerous hazardous air pollutants and many studies have documented population health effects from this exposure. Objectives: We aimed to assess the evidence of health effects from exposure to wildfire smoke and to identify susceptible populations. Methods: We reviewed the scientific literature for studies of wildfire smoke exposure on mortality and on respiratory, cardiovascular, mental, and perinatal health. Within those reviewed papers deemed to have minimal risk of bias, we assessed the coherence and consistency of findings. Discussion: Consistent evidence documents associations between wildfire smoke exposure and general respiratory health effects, specifically exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Growing evidence suggests associations with increased risk of respiratory infections and all-cause mortality. Evidence for cardiovascular effects is mixed, but a few recent studies have reported associations for specific cardiovascular end points. Insufficient research exists to identify specific population subgroups that are more susceptible to wildfire smoke exposure. Conclusions: Consistent evidence from a large number of studies indicates that wildfire smoke exposure is associated with respiratory morbidity with growing evidence supporting an association with all-cause mortality. More research is needed to clarify which causes of mortality may be associated with wildfire smoke, whether cardiovascular outcomes are associated with wildfire smoke, and if certain populations are more susceptible. Citation: Reid CE, Brauer M, Johnston FH, Jerrett M, Balmes JR, Elliott CT. 2016. Critical review of health impacts of wildfire smoke exposure. Environ Health Perspect 124:1334–1343; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409277
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cschollaert@ucla.com
                Journal
                Geohealth
                Geohealth
                10.1002/(ISSN)2471-1403
                GH2
                GeoHealth
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2471-1403
                22 April 2024
                April 2024
                : 8
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1002/gh2.v8.4 )
                : e2023GH000961
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences University of Washington Seattle WA USA
                [ 2 ] Department of Environmental Health Sciences Fielding School of Public Health University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington Seattle WA USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to:

                C. L. Schollaert,

                cschollaert@ 123456ucla.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5046-0414
                Article
                GH2523 2023GH000961
                10.1029/2023GH000961
                11033669
                38651002
                d40be9a6-5739-402e-8b97-9ddadded6275
                © 2024 The Authors. GeoHealth published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 16 February 2024
                : 26 September 2023
                : 15 March 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Pages: 15, Words: 9250
                Funding
                Funded by: University of Washington Population Health Initiative Pilot Grant Program
                Funded by: AWS Cloud Credit for Research Program
                Categories
                Geohealth
                Archaeological Geology
                Public Health
                Research Article
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                April 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.0 mode:remove_FC converted:22.04.2024

                smoke exposure,wildfire,prescribed burns,agricultural burns,environmental justice

                Comments

                Comment on this article