7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differences in the performance of NK1R−/− (‘knockout’) and wildtype mice in the 5‑Choice Continuous Performance Test

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • We compared the behaviour of NK1R−/− mice and wildtypes in the 5-Choice Continuous Performance Test.

          • NK1R−/− mice did not express excess impulsivity (premature response or false alarms) in this test.

          • NK1R−/− mice expressed excessive perseveration, which is common in ADHD.

          • The findings point to a behavioural phenotype for ADHD patients with polymorphism of the TACR1 gene.

          Abstract

          Mice lacking functional NK1 (substance P-preferring) receptors typically display excessive inattentiveness ( omission errors) and impulsivity ( premature responses) when compared with wildtypes in the 5-Choice Serial Reaction-Time Test (5-CSRTT). These abnormal behaviours are analogous to those seen in humans suffering from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Here we used the 5-Choice Continuous‑Performance Test (5C-CPT) to ascertain whether NK1R−/− mice also display excessive false alarms (an inappropriate response to a ‘ no-go’ signal), which is another form of impulsive behaviour. NK1R−/− mice completed more trials than wildtypes, confirming their ability to learn and carry out the task. At the start of Stage 1 of training, but not subsequently, they also scored more premature responses than wildtypes. When the mice were tested for the first time, neither false alarms nor premature responses was higher in NK1R−/− mice than wildtypes but, as in the 5-CSRTT, the latter behaviour was strongly dependent on time of day. NK1R−/− mice expressed excessive perseveration during all stages of the 5C-CPT. This behaviour is thought to reflect compulsive checking, which is common in ADHD patients. These findings point to differences in the 5-CSRTT and 5C-CPT protocols that could be important for distinguishing why the cognitive performance and response control of NK1R−/− mice differs from their wildtypes. The results further lead to the prediction that ADHD patients with polymorphism of the TACR1 gene (the human equivalent of Nk1r) would express more perseveration, but not false alarms, in Continuous Performance Tests when compared with other groups of subjects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references74

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Varieties of impulsivity.

          J Evenden (1999)
          The concept of impulsivity covers a wide range of "actions that are poorly conceived, prematurely expressed, unduly risky, or inappropriate to the situation and that often result in undesirable outcomes". As such it plays an important role in normal behaviour, as well as, in a pathological form, in many kinds of mental illness such as mania, personality disorders, substance abuse disorders and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Although evidence from psychological studies of human personality suggests that impulsivity may be made up of several independent factors, this has not made a major impact on biological studies of impulsivity. This may be because there is little unanimity as to which these factors are. The present review summarises evidence for varieties of impulsivity from several different areas of research: human psychology, psychiatry and animal behaviour. Recently, a series of psychopharmacological studies has been carried out by the present author and colleagues using methods proposed to measure selectively different aspects of impulsivity. The results of these studies suggest that several neurochemical mechanisms can influence impulsivity, and that impulsive behaviour has no unique neurobiological basis. Consideration of impulsivity as the result of several different, independent factors which interact to modulate behaviour may provide better insight into the pathology than current hypotheses based on serotonergic underactivity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Uncertainty, neuromodulation, and attention.

            Uncertainty in various forms plagues our interactions with the environment. In a Bayesian statistical framework, optimal inference and prediction, based on unreliable observations in changing contexts, require the representation and manipulation of different forms of uncertainty. We propose that the neuromodulators acetylcholine and norepinephrine play a major role in the brain's implementation of these uncertainty computations. Acetylcholine signals expected uncertainty, coming from known unreliability of predictive cues within a context. Norepinephrine signals unexpected uncertainty, as when unsignaled context switches produce strongly unexpected observations. These uncertainty signals interact to enable optimal inference and learning in noisy and changeable environments. This formulation is consistent with a wealth of physiological, pharmacological, and behavioral data implicating acetylcholine and norepinephrine in specific aspects of a range of cognitive processes. Moreover, the model suggests a class of attentional cueing tasks that involve both neuromodulators and shows how their interactions may be part-antagonistic, part-synergistic.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Differential patterns of striatal activation in young children with and without ADHD.

              Cognitive control, defined as the ability to suppress inappropriate thoughts and actions, is compromised in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study examines the neural basis of this deficit. We used a paradigm that incorporates a parametric manipulation within a go/nogo task, so that the number of go trials preceding a nogo trial is varied to tax the neural systems underlying cognitive control with increasing levels of interference. Using this paradigm in combination with event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we show that children without ADHD have increased susceptibility to interference with increasing numbers of go trials preceding a nogo trial, but children with ADHD have difficulty even with a single go trial preceding a nogo trial. In addition, children with ADHD do not activate frontostriatal regions in the same manner as normally developing children, but rather rely on a more diffuse network of regions, including more posterior and dorsolateral prefrontal regions. Normal immature cognition may be characterized as being susceptible to interference and supported by the maturation of frontostriatal circuitry. ADHD children show a slightly different cognitive profile at 6 to 10 years of age that is paralleled by a relative lack of or delay in the maturation of ventral frontostriatal circuitry.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Behav Brain Res
                Behav. Brain Res
                Behavioural Brain Research
                Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press
                0166-4328
                1872-7549
                01 February 2016
                01 February 2016
                : 298
                : Pt B
                : 268-277
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
                [b ]Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
                [c ]Research Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. c.stanford@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                [1]

                Contributed equally to the experiment.

                Article
                S0166-4328(15)30257-6
                10.1016/j.bbr.2015.10.045
                4683099
                26522842
                d3f31fe4-49ac-451b-9086-31dccd4e32bd
                © 2015 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 24 July 2015
                : 19 October 2015
                : 23 October 2015
                Categories
                Research Report

                Neurosciences
                adhd,false alarms,inattentiveness,nk1 receptor,perseveration,premature responses,5-choice continuous-performance test,impulsivity,motor disinhibition

                Comments

                Comment on this article