9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Associations of antenatal maternal psychological distress with infant birth and development outcomes: Results from a South African birth cohort

      research-article
      a , b , * , c , d , a , b , a , e , f , g , c , d , a , b , a , g , h
      Comprehensive Psychiatry
      W.B. Saunders
      DCHS, drakenstein child health study, HIC, high income country, LMIC, low- and middle-income country, SRQ20, self-reporting questionnaire 20-item, BDI, beck depression inventory, IPV, intimate partner violence, PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder, BSID III, bayley III scales of infant and toddler development, WAZ, weight for age z-score, HCAZ, head circumference for age z-score, SGA, small for gestational-age, AGA, appropriate for gestational-age, LGA, large for gestational-age, CI, confidence interval, Antenatal maternal psychological distress, Foetal growth, South Africa

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • High levels of antenatal maternal psychological distress in a South African context.

          • Maternal childhood trauma, PTSD and depression linked with psychological distress.

          • Antenatal maternal psychological distress found to predict lower birth weight.

          • Antenatal psychological distress associated with smaller birth head circumference.

          Abstract

          Background

          Antenatal maternal psychological distress is common in low and middle-income countries (LMIC), but there is a dearth of research on its effect on birth and developmental outcomes in these settings, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study set out to identify risk factors for antenatal maternal psychological distress and determine whether antenatal maternal psychological distress was associated with infant birth and developmental outcomes, using data from the Drakenstein Child Health Study (DCHS), a birth cohort study in South Africa.

          Methods

          Pregnant women were enrolled in the DCHS from primary care antenatal clinics. Antenatal maternal psychological distress was measured using the Self-Reporting Questionnaire 20-item (SRQ-20). A range of psychosocial measures, including maternal childhood trauma, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were administered. Birth outcomes, including premature birth, weight-for-age z-score and head circumference-for-age z-score, were measured using revised Fenton growth charts. The Bayley III Scales of Infant and Toddler Development was administered at 6 months of age to assess infant development outcomes, including cognitive, language, and motor domains in a subset of n = 231. Associations of maternal antenatal psychological distress with psychosocial measures, and with infant birth and developmental outcomes were examined using linear regression models.

          Results

          961 women were included in this analysis, with 197 (21%) reporting scores indicating the presence of psychological distress. Antenatal psychological distress was associated with maternal childhood trauma, antenatal depression, and PTSD, and inversely associated with partner support. No association was observed between antenatal maternal psychological distress and preterm birth or early developmental outcomes, but antenatal maternal psychological distress was associated with a smaller head circumference at birth (coefficient=−0.30, 95% CI: −0.49; −0.10).

          Conclusion

          Antenatal maternal psychological distress is common in LMIC settings and was found to be associated with key psychosocial measures during pregnancy, as well as with adverse birth outcomes, in our study population. These associations highlight the potential value of screening for antenatal maternal psychological distress as well as of developing targeted interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing post-traumatic stress disorder

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy: implications for mothers, children, research, and practice.

            To briefly review results of the latest research on the contributions of depression, anxiety, and stress exposures in pregnancy to adverse maternal and child outcomes, and to direct attention to new findings on pregnancy anxiety, a potent maternal risk factor. Anxiety, depression, and stress in pregnancy are risk factors for adverse outcomes for mothers and children. Anxiety in pregnancy is associated with shorter gestation and has adverse implications for fetal neurodevelopment and child outcomes. Anxiety about a particular pregnancy is especially potent. Chronic strain, exposure to racism, and depressive symptoms in mothers during pregnancy are associated with lower birth weight infants with consequences for infant development. These distinguishable risk factors and related pathways to distinct birth outcomes merit further investigation. This body of evidence, and the developing consensus regarding biological and behavioral mechanisms, sets the stage for a next era of psychiatric and collaborative interdisciplinary research on pregnancy to reduce the burden of maternal stress, depression, and anxiety in the perinatal period. It is critical to identify the signs, symptoms, and diagnostic thresholds that warrant prenatal intervention and to develop efficient, effective and ecologically valid screening and intervention strategies to be used widely.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (1 of 7): definitions, description of the burden and opportunities to improve data

              Introduction This is the first of seven articles from a preterm birth and stillbirth report. Presented here is an overview of the burden, an assessment of the quality of current estimates, review of trends, and recommendations to improve data. Preterm birth Few countries have reliable national preterm birth prevalence data. Globally, an estimated 13 million babies are born before 37 completed weeks of gestation annually. Rates are generally highest in low- and middle-income countries, and increasing in some middle- and high-income countries, particularly the Americas. Preterm birth is the leading direct cause of neonatal death (27%); more than one million preterm newborns die annually. Preterm birth is also the dominant risk factor for neonatal mortality, particularly for deaths due to infections. Long-term impairment is an increasing issue. Stillbirth Stillbirths are currently not included in Millennium Development Goal tracking and remain invisible in global policies. For international comparisons, stillbirths include late fetal deaths weighing more than 1000g or occurring after 28 weeks gestation. Only about 2% of all stillbirths are counted through vital registration and global estimates are based on household surveys or modelling. Two global estimation exercises reached a similar estimate of around three million annually; 99% occur in low- and middle-income countries. One million stillbirths occur during birth. Global stillbirth cause-of-death estimates are impeded by multiple, complex classification systems. Recommendations to improve data (1) increase the capture and quality of pregnancy outcome data through household surveys, the main data source for countries with 75% of the global burden; (2) increase compliance with standard definitions of gestational age and stillbirth in routine data collection systems; (3) strengthen existing data collection mechanisms—especially vital registration and facility data—by instituting a standard death certificate for stillbirth and neonatal death linked to revised International Classification of Diseases coding; (4) validate a simple, standardized classification system for stillbirth cause-of-death; and (5) improve systems and tools to capture acute morbidity and long-term impairment outcomes following preterm birth. Conclusion Lack of adequate data hampers visibility, effective policies, and research. Immediate opportunities exist to improve data tracking and reduce the burden of preterm birth and stillbirth.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Compr Psychiatry
                Compr Psychiatry
                Comprehensive Psychiatry
                W.B. Saunders
                0010-440X
                1532-8384
                1 January 2020
                January 2020
                : 96
                : 152128
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, University of Cape Town, South Africa
                [b ]South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), Unit on Child & Adolescent Health, Cape Town, South Africa
                [c ]KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
                [d ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK
                [e ]Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
                [f ]Statistical Consulting Service, Department of Statistical Science, University of Cape Town, South Africa
                [g ]Department of Psychiatry & Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, South Africa
                [h ]South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Unit on Risk & Resilience in Mental Disorders, South Africa
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, Klipfontein Road, Rondebosch, 7700, UCT, Cape Town, South Africa. rae.macginty@ 123456uct.ac.za
                Article
                S0010-440X(19)30051-3 152128
                10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.152128
                6945113
                31715335
                d23fd91a-d2ce-4d7e-be31-7076396b652e
                © 2019 University of Cape Town

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                dchs, drakenstein child health study,hic, high income country,lmic, low- and middle-income country,srq20, self-reporting questionnaire 20-item,bdi, beck depression inventory,ipv, intimate partner violence,ptsd, post-traumatic stress disorder,bsid iii, bayley iii scales of infant and toddler development,waz, weight for age z-score,hcaz, head circumference for age z-score,sga, small for gestational-age,aga, appropriate for gestational-age,lga, large for gestational-age,ci, confidence interval,antenatal maternal psychological distress,foetal growth,south africa

                Comments

                Comment on this article