1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Biological and psychosocial evidence in the Cass Review: A critical commentary

      Preprint
      Center for Open Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In 2020, the UK’s National Health Services (NHS) commissioned an independent review to provide recommendations for the appropriate treatment for trans children and young people in its children’s gender services. This independent review, named the Cass Review, was published in 2024 and aimed to provide such recommendations based on, among other sources, the current available literature and an independent research program. This commentary seeks to investigate the robustness of the biological and psychosocial evidence the Review — and the independent research programme through it — provides for its recommendations. Several issues with the scientific substantiation are highlighted, calling into question the robustness of the evidence the Review bases its claims on, as such, calling into question whether the Review is able to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate its recommendations to deviate from the international standard of care for trans children and young people.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          (View ORCID Profile)
          Journal
          Center for Open Science
          April 26 2024
          Article
          10.31235/osf.io/wjafd
          d1ec2264-2a9c-46ed-a096-c0c3d48ce311
          © 2024

          https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article