9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Twenty-first century house calls: a survey of ambulatory care providers to inform organisational telehealth strategy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          While patient interest in telehealth increases, clinicians’ perspectives may influence longer-term adoption. We sought to identify facilitators and barriers to continued clinician incorporation of telehealth into practice.

          Methods

          A cross-sectional 24-item web-based survey was emailed to 491 providers with ≥50 video visits (VVs) within an academic health system between 1 March 2020 and 31 December 2020. We quantitatively summarised the characteristics and perceptions of respondents by using descriptive and test statistics. We used systematic content analysis to qualitatively code open-ended responses, double coding at least 25%.

          Results

          247 providers (50.3%) responded to the survey. Seventy-nine per cent were confident in their ability to deliver excellent clinical care through VV. In comparison, 48% were confident in their ability to troubleshoot technical issues. Most clinicians (87%) expressed various concerns about VV. Providers across specialties generally agreed that VV reduced infection risk (71%) and transportation barriers (71%). Three overarching themes in the qualitative data included infrastructure and training, usefulness and expectation setting for patients and providers.

          Discussion

          As healthcare systems plan for future delivery directions, they must address the tension between patients’ and providers’ expectations of care within the digital space. Telehealth creates new friction, one where the healthcare system must fit into the patient’s life rather than the usual dynamic of the patient fitting into the healthcare system.

          Conclusion

          Telehealth infrastructure and patient and clinician technological acumen continue to evolve. Clinicians in this survey offered valuable insights into the directions healthcare organisations can take to right-size this healthcare delivery modality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science

          Background Many interventions found to be effective in health services research studies fail to translate into meaningful patient care outcomes across multiple contexts. Health services researchers recognize the need to evaluate not only summative outcomes but also formative outcomes to assess the extent to which implementation is effective in a specific setting, prolongs sustainability, and promotes dissemination into other settings. Many implementation theories have been published to help promote effective implementation. However, they overlap considerably in the constructs included in individual theories, and a comparison of theories reveals that each is missing important constructs included in other theories. In addition, terminology and definitions are not consistent across theories. We describe the Consolidated Framework For Implementation Research (CFIR) that offers an overarching typology to promote implementation theory development and verification about what works where and why across multiple contexts. Methods We used a snowball sampling approach to identify published theories that were evaluated to identify constructs based on strength of conceptual or empirical support for influence on implementation, consistency in definitions, alignment with our own findings, and potential for measurement. We combined constructs across published theories that had different labels but were redundant or overlapping in definition, and we parsed apart constructs that conflated underlying concepts. Results The CFIR is composed of five major domains: intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of the individuals involved, and the process of implementation. Eight constructs were identified related to the intervention (e.g., evidence strength and quality), four constructs were identified related to outer setting (e.g., patient needs and resources), 12 constructs were identified related to inner setting (e.g., culture, leadership engagement), five constructs were identified related to individual characteristics, and eight constructs were identified related to process (e.g., plan, evaluate, and reflect). We present explicit definitions for each construct. Conclusion The CFIR provides a pragmatic structure for approaching complex, interacting, multi-level, and transient states of constructs in the real world by embracing, consolidating, and unifying key constructs from published implementation theories. It can be used to guide formative evaluations and build the implementation knowledge base across multiple studies and settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Categorical Data Analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design

              This article provides researchers with knowledge of how to design a high quality mixed methods research study. To design a mixed study, researchers must understand and carefully consider each of the dimensions of mixed methods design, and always keep an eye on the issue of validity. We explain the seven major design dimensions: purpose, theoretical drive, timing (simultaneity and dependency), point of integration, typological versus interactive design approaches, planned versus emergent design, and design complexity. There also are multiple secondary dimensions that need to be considered during the design process. We explain ten secondary dimensions of design to be considered for each research study. We also provide two case studies showing how the mixed designs were constructed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Health Care Inform
                BMJ Health Care Inform
                bmjhci
                bmjhci
                BMJ Health & Care Informatics
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2632-1009
                2022
                23 December 2022
                : 29
                : 1
                : e100626
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentCollege of Nursing , University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee , Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
                [2 ]departmentFamily and Community Medicine , Medical College of Wisconsin Department of Family and Community Medicine , Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
                [3 ]departmentDepartment of Medicine , Medical College of Wisconsin , Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
                [4 ]departmentKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute , Kaiser Permanente , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [5 ]departmentSchool of Pharmacy , Medical College of Wisconsin , Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
                [6 ]departmentCardio-Oncology , Medical College of Wisconsin Cardiovascular Center , Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Jeana M Holt; jmholt@ 123456uwm.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3392-0164
                Article
                bmjhci-2022-100626
                10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100626
                9791455
                36564094
                d1de32cd-0090-43ce-9e3a-1e2b45e5c051
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 07 June 2022
                : 13 November 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006108, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences;
                Award ID: UL1TR001436 and KL2TR001438
                Categories
                Original Research
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                delivery of health care,health communication,outcome and process assessment, health care,patient-centered care,telemedicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article