13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Harnessing Telemedicine for the Provision of Health Care: Bibliometric and Scientometric Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In recent decades, advances in information technology have given new momentum to telemedicine research. These advances in telemedicine range from individual to population levels, allowing the exchange of patient information for diagnosis and management of health problems, primary care prevention, and education of physicians via distance learning.

          Objective

          This scientometric investigation aims to examine collaborative research networks, dominant research themes and disciplines, and seminal research studies that have contributed most to the field of telemedicine. This information is vital for scientists, institutions, and policy stakeholders to evaluate research areas where more infrastructural or scholarly contributions are required.

          Methods

          For analyses, we used CiteSpace (version 4.0 R5; Drexel University), which is a Java-based software that allows scientometric analysis, especially visualization of collaborative networks and research themes in a specific field.

          Results

          We found that scholarly activity has experienced a significant increase in the last decade. Most important works were conducted by institutions located in high-income countries. A discipline-specific shift from radiology to telestroke, teledermatology, telepsychiatry, and primary care was observed. The most important innovations that yielded a collaborative influence were reported in the following medical disciplines, in descending order: public environmental and occupational health, psychiatry, pediatrics, health policy and services, nursing, rehabilitation, radiology, pharmacology, surgery, respiratory medicine, neurosciences, obstetrics, and geriatrics.

          Conclusions

          Despite a continuous rise in scholarly activity in telemedicine, we noticed several gaps in the literature. For instance, all the primary and secondary research central to telemedicine was conducted in the context of high-income countries, including the evidence synthesis approaches that pertained to implementation aspects of telemedicine. Furthermore, the research landscape and implementation of telemedicine infrastructure are expected to see exponential progress during and after the COVID-19 era.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The effectiveness of telemental health: a 2013 review.

            The effectiveness of any new technology is typically measured in order to determine whether it successfully achieves equal or superior objectives over what is currently offered. Research in telemental health-in this article mainly referring to telepsychiatry and psychological services-has advanced rapidly since 2003, and a new effectiveness review is needed. The authors reviewed the published literature to synthesize information on what is and what is not effective related to telemental health. Terms for the search included, but were not limited to, telepsychiatry, effectiveness, mental health, e-health, videoconferencing, telemedicine, cost, access, and international. Telemental health is effective for diagnosis and assessment across many populations (adult, child, geriatric, and ethnic) and for disorders in many settings (emergency, home health) and appears to be comparable to in-person care. In addition, this review has identified new models of care (i.e., collaborative care, asynchronous, mobile) with equally positive outcomes. Telemental health is effective and increases access to care. Future directions suggest the need for more research on service models, specific disorders, the issues relevant to culture and language, and cost.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews.

              To conduct a review of reviews on the impacts and costs of telemedicine services. A review of systematic reviews of telemedicine interventions was conducted. Interventions included all e-health interventions, information and communication technologies for communication in health care, Internet based interventions for diagnosis and treatments, and social care if important part of health care and in collaboration with health care for patients with chronic conditions were considered relevant. Each potentially relevant systematic review was assessed in full text by one member of an external expert team, using a revised check list from EPOC (Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group) to assess quality. Qualitative analysis of the included reviews was informed by principles of realist review. In total 1593 titles/abstracts were identified. Following quality assessment, the review included 80 heterogeneous systematic reviews. Twenty-one reviews concluded that telemedicine is effective, 18 found that evidence is promising but incomplete and others that evidence is limited and inconsistent. Emerging themes are the particularly problematic nature of economic analyses of telemedicine, the benefits of telemedicine for patients, and telemedicine as complex and ongoing collaborative achievements in unpredictable processes. The emergence of new topic areas in this dynamic field is notable and reviewers are starting to explore new questions beyond those of clinical and cost-effectiveness. Reviewers point to a continuing need for larger studies of telemedicine as controlled interventions, and more focus on patients' perspectives, economic analyses and on telemedicine innovations as complex processes and ongoing collaborative achievements. Formative assessments are emerging as an area of interest. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Med Internet Res
                J Med Internet Res
                JMIR
                Journal of Medical Internet Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1439-4456
                1438-8871
                October 2020
                2 October 2020
                : 22
                : 10
                : e18835
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Institute of Population Health University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom
                [2 ] Lifestyle Science Cluster Advanced Medical and Dental Institute Universiti Sains Malaysia Penang Malaysia
                [3 ] Global Health and Tropical Medicine Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical Universidade Nova de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
                [4 ] Telemedicine University Network Rede Nacional de Ensino e Pesquisa Brasília Brazil
                [5 ] Unit of Patient Education Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Nutrition and Patient Education Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Jorge César Correia jorgecesar.correia@ 123456hcuge.ch
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3772-194X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5735-6441
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0506-1294
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1422-3892
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7020-0695
                Article
                v22i10e18835
                10.2196/18835
                7568215
                33006571
                d1c8368f-d24f-49f7-a0d5-979956b2f04c
                ©Ahmed Waqas, Soo Huat Teoh, Luís Velez Lapão, Luiz Ary Messina, Jorge César Correia. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 02.10.2020.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 22 March 2020
                : 28 June 2020
                : 26 July 2020
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                Medicine
                telemedicine,scientometric analysis,evidence synthesis,health information technology,research,theme

                Comments

                Comment on this article