28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Time course of conflict processing modulated by brief meditation training

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resolving conflict is a pivotal self-control ability for human adaptation and survival. Although some studies reported meditation may affect conflict resolution, the neural mechanisms are poorly understood. We conducted a fully randomized 5 h trial of one form of mindfulness meditation—integrative body-mind training (IBMT) in comparison to a relaxation training control. During the Stroop word-color task, IBMT group produced faster resolution of conflict, a smaller N2 and an earlier and larger P3 component of the event-related brain potentials. These results indicate that brief meditation training induces a brain state that improves the resolution of conflict.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation.

          Research over the past two decades broadly supports the claim that mindfulness meditation - practiced widely for the reduction of stress and promotion of health - exerts beneficial effects on physical and mental health, and cognitive performance. Recent neuroimaging studies have begun to uncover the brain areas and networks that mediate these positive effects. However, the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear, and it is apparent that more methodologically rigorous studies are required if we are to gain a full understanding of the neuronal and molecular bases of the changes in the brain that accompany mindfulness meditation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Meditation, mindfulness and cognitive flexibility.

            This study investigated the link between meditation, self-reported mindfulness and cognitive flexibility as well as other attentional functions. It compared a group of meditators experienced in mindfulness meditation with a meditation-naïve control group on measures of Stroop interference and the "d2-concentration and endurance test". Overall the results suggest that attentional performance and cognitive flexibility are positively related to meditation practice and levels of mindfulness. Meditators performed significantly better than non-meditators on all measures of attention. Furthermore, self-reported mindfulness was higher in meditators than non-meditators and correlations with all attention measures were of moderate to high strength. This pattern of results suggests that mindfulness is intimately linked to improvements of attentional functions and cognitive flexibility. The relevance of these findings for mental balance and well-being are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex.

              The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) has been shown to respond to conflict between simultaneously active, incompatible response tendencies. This area is active during high-conflict correct trials and also when participants make errors. Here, we use the temporal resolution of high-density event-related potentials (ERPs) in combination with source localization to investigate the timing of ACC activity during conflict and error detection. We predicted that the same area of the ACC is active prior to high-conflict correct responses and following erroneous responses. Dipole modeling supported this prediction: The frontocentral N2, occurring prior to the response on correct conflict trials, and the ERN, occurring immediately following error responses, could both be modeled as having a generator in the caudal ACC, suggesting the same process to underlie both peaks. Modeling further suggested that the rostral area of the ACC was also active following errors, but later in time, contributing to the error positivity (P(E)), and peaking at 200-250 msec following the ERN peak. Despite the inherent limitations of source localization, these data may begin to shed light on the timing of action-monitoring processes. First, the time course of caudal ACC activity follows the time course as predicted by the conflict theory of this region. Second, caudal ACC activity might be temporally dissociated from rostral ACC activity during error trials, which possibly reflects a separate, affective component of the evaluative functions of the ACC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                03 July 2015
                2015
                : 6
                : 911
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Dalian Blood Center , Dalian, China
                [2] 2Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University , Lubbock, TX, USA
                [3] 3Department of Psychology, University of Oregon , Eugene, OR, USA
                [4] 4Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis , St. Louis, MO, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Barbara Tomasino, University of Udine, Italy

                Reviewed by: Mariano Sigman, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; Maria Engström, Linköping University, Sweden

                *Correspondence: Yi-Yuan Tang, Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA, yiyuan.tang@ 123456ttu.edu ; Michael I. Posner, Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA, mposner@ 123456uoregon.edu
                These authors have contributed equally to this work

                This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology.

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00911
                4490222
                26191022
                d1aafa00-aa09-42c4-bae8-26f85afc5697
                Copyright © 2015 Fan, Tang, Tang and Posner.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 30 November 2014
                : 18 June 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 41, Pages: 6, Words: 4582
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                ibmt,conflict resolution,self-control,brain state,acc,n2,p3
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                ibmt, conflict resolution, self-control, brain state, acc, n2, p3

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content199

                Cited by15

                Most referenced authors374