1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Clinical activity of camizestrant, a next-generation SERD, versus fulvestrant in patients with a detectable ESR1 mutation: Exploratory analysis of the SERENA-2 phase 2 trial.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          1066

          Background: Camizestrant, a next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader (ngSERD), was compared at two dose levels to fulvestrant 500 mg (F) in post-menopausal women with advanced ER+, HER2˗ breast cancer with disease recurrence or progression after ≤1 endocrine therapy in the advanced setting in the Phase 2 randomized SERENA-2 study (NCT04214288). Camizestrant demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit vs F in progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall study population (Oliveira M et al. SABCS 2022 Annual Meeting. Abstract GS3-02.). Methods: Baseline circulating tumour DNA was collected at screening and/or Cycle 1 Day 1 and analysed by next-generation sequencing. A post hoc exploratory analysis compared investigator assessed PFS with camizestrant (data from 75 and 150 mg combined) vs F in patients with detectable baseline ESR1 (the gene that encodes ERα) hotspot mutations ( ESR1m). Patients were divided into subgroups based on whether 1 or >1 ESR1m variants were detected, the specific ESR1m, and whether mutations were detected in BRCA1/2 or the MAPK pathway. The most prevalent mutations are presented. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare PFS. Results: 48/147 (32.7%) patients treated with camizestrant and 35/73 (47.9%) treated with F had a detectable ESR1m in at least 1 baseline sample. ESR1m were detected in 6/9 (67%) patients with a BRCA1/2 mutation and 5/26 (19%) with a MAPK pathway alteration; however, the numbers were too small to analyse efficacy in these subgroups. Conclusions: Camizestrant showed improved outcome vs F in patients with a detectable ESR1m at baseline and in the subgroups tested. The greatest median PFS improvement was seen in patients where a single ESR1m variant was detected, suggesting that early intervention upon detection of an ESR1m may provide the maximum patient benefit for camizestrant, a hypothesis that is being tested in the SERENA-6 clinical trial (NCT04964934). Clinical trial information: NCT04214288 . [Table: see text]

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          June 01 2023
          June 01 2023
          : 41
          : 16_suppl
          : 1066
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Medical Oncology Department and Breast Cancer Group, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
          [2 ]Medical Center Verum, Kyiv, Ukraine
          [3 ]Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN
          [4 ]Makiivka City Hospital of Donetsk Region, Makiivka, Ukraine
          [5 ]Academician Fridon Todua Medical Center - Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tbilisi, Georgia
          [6 ]Multidisciplinary Breast Center, University Hospitals Leuven – Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
          [7 ]The Institute of Clinical Oncology, Tbilisi, Georgia
          [8 ]AV Medical Group, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
          [9 ]Bukovynsky Clinical Oncology Center, Chernivtsi, Ukraine
          [10 ]Central City Hospital, Uzhgorod National University, Uzhgorod, Ukraine
          [11 ]IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
          [12 ]Pyatigorsky Oncology Dispensary, Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation
          [13 ]Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
          [14 ]Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, Cambridge, United Kingdom
          [15 ]Late Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
          [16 ]Helsicore Israeli Georgian Medical Research Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgia
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.1066
          d14196b5-5749-4639-843e-b3cbc88c3649
          © 2023
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article