44
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Nobel Prize for Physical Therapy? Rise, Fall, and Revival of Medico-Mechanical Institutes

      1 , 2
      Physical Therapy
      American Physical Therapy Association (APTA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This historical vignette explores the considerations of the Nobel Prize Committee for Physiology or Medicine by vetting the Nobel Prize chances of Dr Gustaf Zander (1835–1920). His way to stardom started 150 years ago when he began mechanizing the passive and active movements that physical therapists manually used to treat diseases. A glance at his machines shows that they parallel surprisingly well what can be found in modern fitness studios. By combining files from the Nobel Prize Archive and sources from the first physical therapists, this vignette pieces together why Zander was considered one of the best candidates for the Nobel Prize in 1916. By providing this glimpse of history, questions about the origin of physical therapy concepts and the profession of the physical therapist are raised.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Roots of Physical Medicine, Physical Therapy, and Mechanotherapy in the Netherlands in the 19thCentury: A Disputed Area within the Healthcare Domain

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            “Highly Qualified Loser”? Harvey Cushing and the Nobel Prize

            Neurosurgery, in particular surgery of the brain, was recognized as one of the most spectacular transgressions of the traditional limits of surgical work. With their audacious, technically demanding, laboratory-based, and highly promising new interventions, prominent neurosurgeons were primary candidates for the Nobel Prize. Accordingly, neurosurgical pioneers such as Victor Horsley and, in particular, Harvey Cushing continued to be nominated for the prize. However, only António Egas Moniz was eventually awarded the prestigious award in 1949 for the introduction of frontal lobotomy, an intervention that would no longer be prize-worthy from today's perspective. Horsley and Cushing, who were arguably the most important proponents of early neurosurgery, remained “highly qualified losers,” as such cases have been called. This paper examines the nominations, reviews, and discussions kept in the Nobel Archives to understand the reasons for this remarkable choice. At a more general level, the authors use the example of neurosurgery to explore the mechanisms of scientific recognition and what could be called the enacting of excellence in science and medicine.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Manipulated History of Manipulations of Spines and Joints? Rethinking Orthopaedic Medicine Through the 19th Century Discourse of European Mechanical Medicine

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Physical Therapy
                American Physical Therapy Association (APTA)
                0031-9023
                1538-6724
                August 01 2015
                August 01 2015
                : 95
                : 8
                : 1184-1194
                Affiliations
                [1 ]N. Hansson, PhD, Institute for the History of Medicine and Medical Ethics, University of Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 20, 50931 Köln/Cologne, Germany.
                [2 ]A. Ottosson, PhD, Department of Historical Studies, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
                Article
                10.2522/ptj.20140284
                25655882
                d0165774-2db9-49ea-8f9d-0ce9b604b239
                © 2015
                History

                Biochemistry,Animal science & Zoology
                Biochemistry, Animal science & Zoology

                Comments

                Comment on this article