12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Analysis of mental health effects among nurses working during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Accessible Summary

          What is Known on the subject?

          • Working on the frontline during the pandemic has had a negative impact on the mental health of health professionals. A significant proportion experienced anxiety, insomnia, posttraumatic stress or depression.

          What the paper adds to existing knowledge?

          • Analysis and synthesis of the evidence of the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the mental health of nurses based on their work context. There exists a gap in the literature as no studies were found that analysed the effects on nurses' mental health according to the level of care they worked in (hospital–primary care–nursing home).

          What are the implications for practice?

          • There is an urgent need to assess and respond to the impact of COVID‐19 on the physical and mental well‐being of nurses, and to monitor international policies for the improvement of nurses' working conditions.

          Abstract
          Introduction

          Health professionals have suffered negative consequences during the COVID‐19 pandemic. No review has specifically addressed the impact of the pandemic on the mental health of nurses exclusively according to the work context.

          Aim

          To analyse the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the mental health of nurses who have worked in hospitals, primary care centres and social health centres.

          Method

          PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Cochrane databases were searched (Prospero number: CRD42021249513). Out of 706 papers, 31 studies (2020–2021) were included in the systematic review. A qualitative synthesis method was used to analyse the data.

          Results

          Most studies were conducted in hospitals or frontline settings. The prevalence of moderate‐to‐severe symptoms was for anxiety 29.55%, depression 38.79%, posttraumatic stress disorder 29.8%, and insomnia 40.66%.

          Discussion

          This review highlights the mental health effects among nurses working in acute hospital settings. It also evidences a data gap on mental health effects among nurses working in primary health care and in nursing homes.

          Implications for practice

          In the post phase of the pandemic, there is an urgent need to assess and respond to the impact on the mental well‐being of nurses, and to monitor international policies for the improvement of nurses’ working conditions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019

            Key Points Question What factors are associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers in China who are treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Findings In this cross-sectional study of 1257 health care workers in 34 hospitals equipped with fever clinics or wards for patients with COVID-19 in multiple regions of China, a considerable proportion of health care workers reported experiencing symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and distress, especially women, nurses, those in Wuhan, and front-line health care workers directly engaged in diagnosing, treating, or providing nursing care to patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Meaning These findings suggest that, among Chinese health care workers exposed to COVID-19, women, nurses, those in Wuhan, and front-line health care workers have a high risk of developing unfavorable mental health outcomes and may need psychological support or interventions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis

              Highlights • At least one in five healthcare professionals report symptoms of depression and anxiety. • Almost four in 10 healthcare workers experience sleeping difficulties and/or insomnia. • Rates of anxiety and depression were higher for female healthcare workers and nursing staff. • Milder mood symptoms are common and screening should aim to identify mild and sub-threshold syndromes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nelia.soto@unavarra.es
                Journal
                J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs
                J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2850
                JPM
                Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1351-0126
                1365-2850
                01 November 2022
                01 November 2022
                : 10.1111/jpm.12880
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Health Sciences Public University of Navarre (UPNA) Pamplona Spain
                [ 2 ] IdiSNA Navarra Institute for Health Research Pamplona Spain
                [ 3 ] Primary Care Research Group BioDonostia Health Research Institute, IIS Biodonostia Donostia – San Sebastián Spain
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Nelia Soto‐Ruiz, Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarre, Avda. de Barañain s/n. 31008 Pamplona, (Navarra), Spain.

                Email: nelia.soto@ 123456unavarra.es

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-559X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1859-1016
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9097-7493
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5161-2272
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7740-2572
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2263-156X
                Article
                JPM12880 JPM-22-0253.R1
                10.1111/jpm.12880
                9874873
                36270926
                d008087d-66f0-485e-8385-9bb30675517d
                © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 28 August 2022
                : 24 June 2022
                : 16 October 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Pages: 15, Words: 8709
                Funding
                Funded by: Department of Health of the Government of Navarre
                Award ID: 0011‐3638‐2020‐000005
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.4 mode:remove_FC converted:26.01.2023

                covid‐19 pandemic,health services,mental health,nurses,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article