27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative efficacy, tolerability and safety of dolutegravir and efavirenz 400mg among antiretroviral therapies for first-line HIV treatment: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To inform World Health Organization (WHO) global guidelines, we updated and expanded the evidence base to assess the comparative efficacy, tolerability, and safety of first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens.

          Methods

          We searched Embase, Medline and CENTRAL on 28 February 2020 to update the systematic literature review of clinical trials comparing recommended first-line ART that informed previous WHO guidelines. Outcomes included viral suppression, change in CD4 cell counts, mortality, serious and overall adverse events (AEs), discontinuation, discontinuations due to AEs (DAEs); and new outcomes: drug-resistance, neuropsychiatric AEs, early viral suppression, weight gain and birth outcomes. Comparative effects were assessed through network meta-analyses and certainty in the evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework.

          Findings

          We identified 156 publications pertaining to 68 trials for the primary population. Relative to efavirenz, dolutegravir had improved odds of viral suppression across all time points (odds ratio [OR]: 1·94; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 1·48–2·56 at 96 weeks); was protective of drug-resistance (OR: 0·13; 95%CrI: 0·04–0·48); and led to fewer discontinuations (OR: 0·58; 95%CrI: 0·48–0·70). Evidence supported dolutegravir use among TB-HIV co-infected persons and pregnant women. Adverse birth outcomes were observed in 33.2% of dolutegravir-managed pregnancies and 35.0% of efavirenz-managed pregnancies. Low-dose efavirenz had comparable efficacy and safety to standard-dose efavirenz, but led to fewer DAEs (OR: 0·70; 95%CrI: 0·50–0·92).

          Interpretation

          The evidence supports choosing dolutegravir in combination with lamivudine/emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate as the preferred first-line regimen and low-dose efavirenz-based regimens as an alternative. Dolutegravir can be considered to be effective, safe and tolerable.

          Funding

          WHO.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

          Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Antiretroviral Therapy for the Prevention of HIV-1 Transmission.

              An interim analysis of data from the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 052 trial showed that antiretroviral therapy (ART) prevented more than 96% of genetically linked infections caused by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in serodiscordant couples. ART was then offered to all patients with HIV-1 infection (index participants). The study included more than 5 years of follow-up to assess the durability of such therapy for the prevention of HIV-1 transmission.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                EClinicalMedicine
                EClinicalMedicine
                EClinicalMedicine
                Elsevier
                2589-5370
                16 October 2020
                November 2020
                16 October 2020
                : 28
                : 100573
                Affiliations
                [a ]School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
                [b ]Department of HIV/AIDS, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
                [c ]Departments of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
                [d ]Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
                [e ]Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington, DC, USA
                [f ]Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA
                [g ]Botswana–Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana
                [h ]HIV/AIDS Unit, Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
                [i ]South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
                Author notes
                Article
                S2589-5370(20)30317-5 100573
                10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100573
                7700905
                33294805
                ce6705c0-357d-4499-9a74-2a37edeb80b7
                © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/).

                History
                : 1 July 2020
                : 17 September 2020
                : 18 September 2020
                Categories
                Research Paper

                hiv,antiretroviral therapy,first-line,network meta-analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content592

                Cited by32

                Most referenced authors1,141