4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Nurse educators’ experiences with student incivility: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study aimed to synthesize the best available qualitative research evidence on nurse educators’ experiences with student incivility in undergraduate nursing classrooms. A meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence using thematic synthesis was conducted. A systematic search was performed of 12 databases for relevant literature published by March 31, 2019. Two reviewers independently conducted critical quality appraisals using the checklist for qualitative research developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Eleven studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected for review. From the pooled study findings, 26 descriptive themes were generated and categorized into the following 5 analytical themes: (1) factors contributing to student incivility, (2) management of student incivility, (3) impact: professional and personal damage, (4) impact: professional growth, and (5) initiatives for the future. Many nurse educators became confident in their role of providing accountability as both educators and gatekeepers and experienced professional growth. However, others experienced damage to their personal and professional life and lost their motivation to teach. Nurse educators recommended the following strategies for preventing or better managing student incivility: institutional efforts by the university, unified approaches for student incivility within a nursing program, a faculty-to-faculty network for mentoring, and better teaching and learning strategies for individual educators. These strategies would help all nurse educators experience professional growth by successfully preventing and managing student incivility.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments' ability to assess validity in qualitative research.

          The concept of validity has been a central component in critical appraisal exercises evaluating the methodological quality of quantitative studies. Reactions by qualitative researchers have been mixed in relation to whether or not validity should be applied to qualitative research and if so, what criteria should be used to distinguish high-quality articles from others. We compared three online critical appraisal instruments' ability to facilitate an assessment of validity. Many reviewers have used the critical appraisal skills program (CASP) tool to complete their critical appraisal exercise; however, CASP appears to be less sensitive to aspects of validity than the evaluation tool for qualitative studies (ETQS) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool. The ETQS provides detailed instructions on how to interpret criteria; however, it is the JBI tool, with its focus on congruity, that appears to be the most coherent.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education

            “Students as Partners” (SaP) in higher education re-envisions students and staff as active collaborators in teaching and learning. Understanding what research on partnership communicates across the literature is timely and relevant as more staff and students come to embrace SaP. Through a systematic literature review of empirical research, we explored the question: How are SaP practices in higher education presented in the academic literature? Trends across results provide insights into four themes: the importance of reciprocity in partnership; the need to make space in the literature for sharing the (equal) realities of partnership; a focus on partnership activities that are small scale, at the undergraduate level, extracurricular, and focused on teaching and learning enhancement; and the need to move toward inclusive, partnered learning communities in higher education. We highlight nine implications for future research and practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Professional nursing values: A concept analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                J Educ Eval Health Prof
                J Educ Eval Health Prof
                JEEHP
                Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
                Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute
                1975-5937
                2020
                11 August 2020
                : 17
                : 23
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Nursing, Konkuk University, Chungju, Korea
                [2 ]College of Nursing, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
                Hallym University, Korea
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding email: hyunkang@ 123456kangwon.ac.kr
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1629-7745
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0222-1184
                Article
                jeehp-17-23
                10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.23
                7475175
                32791822
                ce2ca22c-6c8f-4981-bfb0-529b54fbdea6
                © 2020, Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 6 July 2020
                : 11 August 2020
                : 11 August 2020
                Categories
                Review Article

                Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods
                education,incivility,qualitative research,students,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article