20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Psoriasis adverse events and associated medications as reported in the US Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System from 2016 to 2021

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To the Editor: Medications that have been reported to exacerbate or induce psoriasis include β-adrenergic blockers (β-blockers), lithium, and antimalarial drugs; however, recent systematic reviews of drug-associated psoriasis are limited, and new causative agents are frequently being reported. 1 We evaluated all reports of psoriasis adverse events in the US Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System from January 1, 2016, through September 30, 2021, excluding medications that have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis. The medications most commonly reported for psoriasis adverse events were prednisone, tocilizumab, hydroxychloroquine, and dupilumab, with 674, 513, 437, and 376 reports, respectively (Table I). Prednisone was the most commonly reported medication, and it is well known to flare psoriasis upon withdrawal. Previous studies have reported that 31% to 42% of the patients with preexisting psoriasis have an exacerbation after the use of antimalarials. 1 Corresponding to the increased use of hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID-19, the highest number of hydroxychloroquine reports by year occurred in 2020. 2 This same trend of a notable increase in reports in 2020 is observed with tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody, which was reported to improve outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19–related pneumonia. 3 , 4 With 376 reports of psoriasis as an adverse event of dupilumab since its approval in 2017, and association via case reports in the literature, this is an emerging medication that warrants consideration. As the use of PD-1 inhibitors such as nivolumab increases, there may be a subsequent increase in reporting of psoriasis, with 175 cases already noted. Table I Reports by year for the top 10 reported medications on the US Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System since 2016 Rank Drug generic name Reports by year Total reports since 2016 2021∗ 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 1 Prednisone 207 285 94 39 22 27 674 2 Tocilizumab 108 252 75 33 27 18 513 3 Hydroxychloroquine 103 217 64 29 13 11 437 4 Dupilumab 170 113 69 24 - - 376 5 Morphine 86 142 29 17 1 4 279 6 Anakinra 62 139 31 11 3 2 248 7 Amlodipine 75 48 37 18 4 13 195 8 Codeine 65 87 17 8 3 - 180 9 Human IgG 50 80 29 6 1 11 177 10 Nivolumab 27 31 27 41 32 17 175 ∗ For 2021, reports are recorded up until only September 30, 2021. The only β-blocker that made it into the top 50 most reported medications was metoprolol, with 97 reports despite the fact that they are one of the most frequently prescribed medications in the United States. 1 , 5 More recent studies discussing the mechanism of β-blocker–induced psoriasis describe this side effect as “rare” overall, despite it being the most frequent type of cutaneous reaction to β-blockers. 1 , 5 Although lithium has traditionally been associated with drug-induced psoriasis, it had just 20 reports since 2016—a finding that may be secondary to the low frequency of lithium prescriptions in the United States relative to the other medications on the list. Although it is a useful tool for observing reporting trends, there are several limitations of the US Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System database. These include that rates of occurrence cannot be established from this database, and thus one cannot definitively compare 2 medications within the database; that the presence of a report cannot establish causation between the adverse event and reported drug, as the information in the reports is not verified and reflects only the reporter’s observations; that the data are subject to reporting bias, for example, medications that are already known to be associated with psoriasis may be less likely to be reported; and that there is the potential for confounders such as underlying disease or concurrent medications that are not controlled for in the study population. Overall, this study supports the importance of providers considering patients’ medications when assessing new or worsening psoriasis, in light of the new availability of medications and changing prescription habits. Conflicts of interest Dr Rosmarin has received honoraria as a consultant for AbbVie, Abcuro, AltruBio, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Concert, CSL Behring, Dermavant, Dermira, Incyte, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sun Pharmaceuticals, UCB, and VielaBio; has received research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Dermira, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc; and has served as a paid speaker for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, and Sanofi. Dr Sobell has served as an investigator, as a consultant, and/or on speakers bureau for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cara, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma, and UCB. Author Learned and Drs Alsukait, Deverapalli, Elliott, Moody, Konnikov, and Ortega have no conflicts of interest to declare.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Tocilizumab in Hospitalized Patients with Severe Covid-19 Pneumonia

          Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is associated with immune dysregulation and hyperinflammation, including elevated interleukin-6 levels. The use of tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-6 receptor, has resulted in better outcomes in patients with severe Covid-19 pneumonia in case reports and retrospective observational cohort studies. Data are needed from randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Methods In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients who were hospitalized with severe Covid-19 pneumonia in a 2:1 ratio receive a single intravenous infusion of tocilizumab (at a dose of 8 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo. Approximately one quarter of the participants received a second dose of tocilizumab or placebo 8 to 24 hours after the first dose. The primary outcome was clinical status at day 28 on an ordinal scale ranging from 1 (discharged or ready for discharge) to 7 (death) in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all the patients who had received at least one dose of tocilizumab or placebo. Results Of the 452 patients who underwent randomization, 438 (294 in the tocilizumab group and 144 in the placebo group) were included in the primary and secondary analyses. The median value for clinical status on the ordinal scale at day 28 was 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 1.0) in the tocilizumab group and 2.0 (non-ICU hospitalization without supplemental oxygen) (95% CI, 1.0 to 4.0) in the placebo group (between-group difference, −1.0; 95% CI, −2.5 to 0; P=0.31 by the van Elteren test). In the safety population, serious adverse events occurred in 103 of 295 patients (34.9%) in the tocilizumab group and in 55 of 143 patients (38.5%) in the placebo group. Mortality at day 28 was 19.7% in the tocilizumab group and 19.4% in the placebo group (weighted difference, 0.3 percentage points (95% CI, –7.6 to 8.2; nominal P=0.94). Conclusions In this randomized trial involving hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19 pneumonia, the use of tocilizumab did not result in significantly better clinical status or lower mortality than placebo at 28 days. (Funded by F. Hoffmann–La Roche and the Department of Health and Human Services; COVACTA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04320615.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine for the Treatment of COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

            Background There is no effective therapy for COVID-19. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) have been used for its treatment but their safety and efficacy remain uncertain. Objective We performed a systematic review to synthesize the available data on the efficacy and safety of CQ and HCQ for the treatment of COVID-19. Methods Two reviewers searched for published and pre-published relevant articles between December 2019 and 8 June 2020. The data from the selected studies were abstracted and analyzed for efficacy and safety outcomes. Critical appraisal of the evidence was done by Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale. The quality of evidence was graded as per the GRADE approach. Results We reviewed 12 observational and 3 randomized trials which included 10,659 patients of whom 5713 received CQ/HCQ and 4966 received only standard of care. The efficacy of CQ/HCQ for COVID-19 was inconsistent across the studies. Meta-analysis of included studies revealed no significant reduction in mortality with HCQ use [RR 0.98 95% CI 0.66–1.46], time to fever resolution (mean difference − 0.54 days (− 1.19–011)) or clinical deterioration/development of ARDS with HCQ [RR 0.90 95% CI 0.47–1.71]. There was a higher risk of ECG abnormalities/arrhythmia with HCQ/CQ [RR 1.46 95% CI 1.04 to 2.06]. The quality of evidence was graded as very low for these outcomes. Authors’ Conclusion The available evidence suggests that CQ or HCQ does not improve clinical outcomes in COVID-19. Well-designed randomized trials are required for assessing the efficacy and safety of HCQ and CQ for COVID-19. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11606-020-06146-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Drug-provoked psoriasis: is it drug induced or drug aggravated?: understanding pathophysiology and clinical relevance.

              Psoriasis is a commonly encountered dermatosis with a variety of internal and external paradoxical factors contributing to the clinical course of the disease. There are several drugs described in the literature that have been associated with the initiation, exacerbation, and aggravation of psoriasis. Understanding the pathophysiology can provide clues to treatment and management of drug-induced and drug-aggravated psoriasis, which may be indistinguishable from idiopathic psoriasis. The clinical manifestations of drug-associated psoriasis can range from plaque-type psoriasis to severe erythroderma, thus warranting astute and sustained clinical observation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JAAD Int
                JAAD Int
                JAAD International
                Elsevier
                2666-3287
                18 April 2022
                June 2022
                18 April 2022
                : 7
                : 144-145
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Dermatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
                [b ]Department of Dermatology, Boston VA Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
                [c ]Department of Pharmacy, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
                Author notes
                []Correspondence to: David Rosmarin, MD, Department of Dermatology, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111 drosmarin@ 123456tuftsmedicalcenter.org
                Article
                S2666-3287(22)00039-6
                10.1016/j.jdin.2022.03.010
                9043660
                cd9376d0-439e-4ab1-b0e6-4a3bc3dddbed
                © 2022 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Research Letter

                adverse events,drug reactions,drug-induced psoriasis,immunodermatology,psoriasis

                Comments

                Comment on this article