6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP) in Morocco

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP) is a large igneous province (LIP) composed of basic dykes, sills, layered intrusions and lava flows emplaced before Pangea break-up and currently distributed on the four continents surrounding the Atlantic Ocean. One of the oldest, best preserved and most complete sub-provinces of the CAMP is located in Morocco. Geochemical, geochronologic, petrographic and magnetostratigraphic data obtained in previous studies allowed identification of four strato-chemical magmatic units, i.e. the Lower, Intermediate, Upper and Recurrent units. For this study, we completed a detailed sampling of the CAMP in Morocco, from the Anti Atlas in the south to the Meseta in the north. We provide a complete mineralogical, petrologic (major and trace elements on whole-rocks and minerals), geochronologic (40Ar/39Ar and U–Pb ages) and geochemical set of data (including Sr–Nd–Pb–Os isotope systematics) for basaltic and basaltic–andesitic lava flow piles and for their presumed feeder dykes and sills. Combined with field observations, these data suggest a very rapid (<0·3 Ma) emplacement of over 95% of the preserved magmatic rocks. In particular, new and previously published data for the Lower to Upper unit samples yielded indistinguishable 40Ar/39Ar (mean age = 201·2 ± 0·8 Ma) and U–Pb ages (201·57 ± 0·04 Ma), suggesting emplacement coincident with the main phase of the end-Triassic biotic turnover (c.201·5 to 201·3 Ma). Eruptions are suggested to have been pulsed with rates in excess of 10 km3/year during five main volcanic pulses, each pulse possibly lasting only a few centuries. Such high eruption rates reinforce the likelihood that CAMP magmatism triggered the end-Triassic climate change and mass extinction. Only the Recurrent unit may have been younger but by no more than 1 Ma. Whole-rock and mineral geochemistry constrain the petrogenesis of the CAMP basalts. The Moroccan magmas evolved in mid-crustal reservoirs (7–20 km deep) where most of the differentiation occurred. However, a previous stage of crystallization probably occurred at even greater depths. The four units cannot be linked by closed-system fractional crystallization processes, but require distinct parental magmas and/or distinct crustal assimilation processes. EC-AFC modeling shows that limited crustal assimilation (maximum c.5–8% assimilation of e.g. Eburnean or Pan-African granites) could explain some, but not all the observed geochemical variations. Intermediate unit magmas are apparently the most contaminated and may have been derived from parental magmas similar to the Upper basalts (as attested by indistinguishable trace element contents in the augites analysed for these units). Chemical differences between Central High Atlas and Middle Atlas samples in the Intermediate unit could be explained by distinct crustal contaminants (lower crustal rocks or Pan-African granites for the former and Eburnean granites for the latter). The CAMP units in Morocco are likely derived from 5–10% melting of enriched peridotite sources. The differences observed in REE ratios for the four units are attributed to variations in both source mineralogy and melting degree. In particular, the Lower basalts require a garnet peridotite source, while the Upper basalts were probably formed from a shallower melting region straddling the garnet–spinel transition. Recurrent basalts instead are relatively shallow-level melts generated mainly from spinel peridotites. Sr–Nd–Pb–Os isotopic ratios in the CAMP units from Morocco are similar to those of other CAMP sub-provinces and suggest a significant enrichment of the mantle-source regions by subducted crustal components. The enriched signature is attributed to involvement of about 5–10% recycled crustal materials introduced into an ambient depleted or PREMA-type mantle, while involvement of mantle-plume components like those sampled by present-day Central Atlantic Ocean Island Basalts (OIB, e.g. Cape Verde and Canary Islands) is not supported by the observed compositions. Only Recurrent basalts may possibly reflect a Central Atlantic plume-like signature similar to the Common or FOZO components.

          Related collections

          Most cited references158

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Chemical Geodynamics

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Chemical Classification of Volcanic Rocks Based on the Total Alkali-Silica Diagram

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A large-scale isotope anomaly in the Southern Hemisphere mantle

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Petrology
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0022-3530
                1460-2415
                May 2019
                May 01 2019
                April 19 2019
                May 2019
                May 01 2019
                April 19 2019
                : 60
                : 5
                : 945-996
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Geoscience Department, Padova University and IGG-CNR, Padova, Italy
                [2 ]Laboratoire de Géologie de Lyon, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS UMR 5276, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
                [3 ]Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences-Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech, Morocco
                [4 ]Instituto Dom Luiz, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
                [5 ]Centre for Earth Evolution and Dynamics (CEED), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
                [6 ]Department of Geosciences, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm SE-104 05, Sweden
                [7 ]Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques, UMR 7358 CNRS-Universtité de Lorraine, France
                [8 ]Department of Earth Sciences, University of Geneva, Genéve, Switzerland
                [9 ]Department of Geology, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA
                [10 ]Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia
                [11 ]IGG-CNR, Pavia, Italy
                [12 ]Département de Géologie, Université Moulay-Ismail, Meknes, Morocco
                [13 ]Moroccan Association of Geosciences, Rabat, Morocco
                [14 ]Berkeley Geochronology Center, Berkeley, USA
                [15 ]Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, USA
                [16 ]Instituto de Geociencias, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
                [17 ]Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, Chouaïb Doukkali University, El Jadida, Morocco
                [18 ]Centre of Earth System Petrology (ESP), Department of Geoscience, Aarhus University, Denmark
                Article
                10.1093/petrology/egz021
                cd902706-09d3-4672-b15e-a8620bfbdccb
                © 2019

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article