3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using hair cortisol analysis to understand the biological factors that affect black-footed ferret ( Mustela nigripes) stress physiology

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          For the first time, cortisol was extracted from hair and used to compare glucocorticoid production among wild and captive black-footed ferrets. Several biological factors influenced hair cortisol concentrations including season, sex, age and location. These unique findings will assist with determining the etiology of infertility in the black-footed ferret.

          Abstract

          The black-footed ferret ( Mustela nigripes) was driven to near extinction due to habitat loss and an introduced disease, sylvatic plague ( Yersinia pestis). After 35 years of breeding in ex situ facilities, the black-footed ferret has been experiencing infertility with seminal traits declining in males and only about a third of breeding-aged females are whelping. Our goal was to use hair cortisol analysis to determine if the ex situ population was experiencing chronic stress that was affecting reproduction by comparing captive ferrets to wild individuals. Our specific objectives were to (i) compare hair cortisol concentrations (HCCs) between age classes (juveniles versus adults), (ii) compare the HCCs of in situ and across different ex situ facilities and (iii) determine the relationship between HCCs and reproductive success. Overall, wild juveniles had higher HCC than wild adults. Our generalized linear mixed model determined that the parameters that best predict HCC for adults were the interactions among sex, in situ versus ex situ facilities and season. During both seasons, wild females had higher HCCs compared to the ex situ females. During the breeding season, male HCCs across breeding facilities varied and males at the breeding facility with the largest ferret habitats had HCCs similar to wild males. At one breeding facility, HCC was higher in males that sired compared to those that did not sire. In conclusion, ex situ ferrets do not have higher HCC than wild individuals when controlling for season and ex situ habitat size, and ex situ males with higher HCC tended to sire. This suggests that HCC may be metabolically driven and/or that low HCC may be an indication of hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis dysregulation and warrants further investigation both for laboratory validation and biological relevance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references96

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions.

            The secretion of glucocorticoids (GCs) is a classic endocrine response to stress. Despite that, it remains controversial as to what purpose GCs serve at such times. One view, stretching back to the time of Hans Selye, posits that GCs help mediate the ongoing or pending stress response, either via basal levels of GCs permitting other facets of the stress response to emerge efficaciously, and/or by stress levels of GCs actively stimulating the stress response. In contrast, a revisionist viewpoint posits that GCs suppress the stress response, preventing it from being pathologically overactivated. In this review, we consider recent findings regarding GC action and, based on them, generate criteria for determining whether a particular GC action permits, stimulates, or suppresses an ongoing stress-response or, as an additional category, is preparative for a subsequent stressor. We apply these GC actions to the realms of cardiovascular function, fluid volume and hemorrhage, immunity and inflammation, metabolism, neurobiology, and reproductive physiology. We find that GC actions fall into markedly different categories, depending on the physiological endpoint in question, with evidence for mediating effects in some cases, and suppressive or preparative in others. We then attempt to assimilate these heterogeneous GC actions into a physiological whole.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              fitdistrplus: AnRPackage for Fitting Distributions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                Conserv Physiol
                Conserv Physiol
                conphys
                Conservation Physiology
                Oxford University Press
                2051-1434
                2021
                11 May 2021
                11 May 2021
                : 9
                : 1
                : coab033
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Conservation and Science Department, Lincoln Park Zoo , 2001 N. Clark St, Chicago, IL 60614, USA
                [2 ]Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago , 1025 E. 57th St, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
                [3 ]Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute , 1500 Remount Rd, Front Royal, VA 22630, USA
                [4 ] Prairie Wildlife Research , PO Box 308, Wellington, CO 80549, USA
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Georgia State University, 100 Piedmont Ave SE, 4th Floor, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. Tel: +1 404 413 5397.Email: rsantymire@ 123456gsu.edu
                Article
                coab033
                10.1093/conphys/coab033
                8114467
                34007452
                cd1d3799-96f3-431f-a956-d43dc1941d77
                © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 3 September 2020
                : 1 February 2021
                : 18 April 2021
                : 18 April 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-namePrairie Wildlife Research;
                Funded by: funder-nameAssociation of Zoos and Aquariums, DOI 10.13039/100005456;
                Funded by: funder-nameThe Davee Foundation;
                Categories
                Research Article
                AcademicSubjects/SCI00840

                age,enzyme immunoassay,ex situ,glucocorticoids,season,sex,wild
                age, enzyme immunoassay, ex situ, glucocorticoids, season, sex, wild

                Comments

                Comment on this article