0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Catfishes: A global review of the literature

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study aims to elucidate the evolution of catfish research publications over recent decades, identify emerging research clusters, examine keyword patterns, determine major contributors (including authors, organizations, and funding agencies), and analyze their collaborative networks and citation bursts on a global scale. The USA, Brazil, China, and India collectively contribute approximately 67% of the total catfish research publications, with a marked increase in prevalence since 2016. The most frequently occurring and dominant keywords are “channel catfish” and “responses,” respectively. Intriguingly, our findings reveal 28 distinct article clusters, with prominent clusters including “yellow catfish,” “channel catfish”, “pectoral girdle,” “African catfish”, “Rio Sao Francisco basin,” “ Edwardsiella ictaluri,” and “temperature mediated”. Concurrently, keyword clustering generates seven main clusters: “new species”, “growth performance”, “heavy metal”, “gonadotropin-releasing”, “essential oil”, and “olfactory receptor”. This study further anticipates future research directions, offering fresh perspectives on the catfish literature landscape. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first article to conduct a comprehensive mapping review of catfish research publications worldwide.

          Abstract

          Catfishes live in marine and freshwater environments and contain both highly endangered and successful invasive species. Due to their worldwide diversity and distribution, they are considered interesting models for scientific research and publication, in various fields of study. In order to fully understand global academic trends and corresponding trajectories about catfish research, the mapping review is proposed based on the 20,139 articles from the metabase of Web of Science Core Collection from its inception until December 2022 and visualized by the scientometric software of CiteSpace.

          Related collections

          Most cited references138

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature

          We present a systematic review of the literature concerning major aspects of science mapping to serve two primary purposes: First, to demonstrate the use of a science mapping approach to perform the review so that researchers may apply the procedure to the review of a scientific domain of their own interest, and second, to identify major areas of research activities concerning science mapping, intellectual milestones in the development of key specialties, evolutionary stages of major specialties involved, and the dynamics of transitions from one specialty to another. We first introduce a theoretical framework of the evolution of a scientific specialty. Then we demonstrate a generic search strategy that can be used to construct a representative dataset of bibliographic records of a domain of research. Next, progressively synthesized co-citation networks are constructed and visualized to aid visual analytic studies of the domain’s structural and dynamic patterns and trends. Finally, trajectories of citations made by particular types of authors and articles are presented to illustrate the predictive potential of the analytic approach. The evolution of the science mapping research involves the development of a number of interrelated specialties. Four major specialties are discussed in detail in terms of four evolutionary stages: conceptualization, tool construction, application, and codification. Underlying connections between major specialties are also explored. The predictive analysis demonstrates citations trajectories of potentially transformative contributions. The systematic review is primarily guided by citation patterns in the dataset retrieved from the literature. The scope of the data is limited by the source of the retrieval, i.e. the Web of Science, and the composite query used. An iterative query refinement is possible if one would like to improve the data quality, although the current approach serves our purpose adequately. More in-depth analyses of each specialty would be more revealing by incorporating additional methods such as citation context analysis and studies of other aspects of scholarly publications. The underlying analytic process of science mapping serves many practical needs, notably bibliometric mapping, knowledge domain visualization, and visualization of scientific literature. In order to master such a complex process of science mapping, researchers often need to develop a diverse set of skills and knowledge that may span multiple disciplines. The approach demonstrated in this article provides a generic method for conducting a systematic review. Incorporating the evolutionary stages of a specialty into the visual analytic study of a research domain is innovative. It provides a systematic methodology for researchers to achieve a good understanding of how scientific fields evolve, to recognize potentially insightful patterns from visually encoded signs, and to synthesize various information so as to capture the state of the art of the domain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews

            Systematic scientometric reviews, empowered by computational and visual analytic approaches, offer opportunities to improve the timeliness, accessibility, and reproducibility of studies of the literature of a field of research. On the other hand, effectively and adequately identifying the most representative body of scholarly publications as the basis of subsequent analyses remains a common bottleneck in the current practice. What can we do to reduce the risk of missing something potentially significant? How can we compare different search strategies in terms of the relevance and specificity of topical areas covered? In this study, we introduce a flexible and generic methodology based on a significant extension of the general conceptual framework of citation indexing for delineating the literature of a research field. The method, through cascading citation expansion, provides a practical connection between studies of science from local and global perspectives. We demonstrate an application of the methodology to the research of literature-based discovery (LBD) and compare five datasets constructed based on three use scenarios and corresponding retrieval strategies, namely a query-based lexical search (one dataset), forward expansions starting from a groundbreaking article of LBD (two datasets), and backward expansions starting from a recently published review article by a prominent expert in LBD (two datasets). We particularly discuss the relevance of areas captured by expansion processes with reference to the query-based scientometric visualization. The method used in this study for comparing bibliometric datasets is applicable to comparative studies of search strategies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Stress and the welfare of cultured fish

              F.S Conte (2004)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Elsevier
                2405-8440
                12 September 2023
                September 2023
                12 September 2023
                : 9
                : 9
                : e20081
                Affiliations
                [a ]Institute of Climate Adaptation and Marine Biotechnology (ICAMB), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT), Kuala Nerus, 21030, Terengganu, Malaysia
                [b ]Research Center for Marine and Land Bioindustry, Earth Sciences and Maritime Organization, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Lombok, 83352, Indonesia
                [c ]Faculty of Fisheries and Food Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT), Kuala Nerus, 21030, Terengganu, Malaysia
                [d ]East Coast Environmental Research Institute, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Gong Badak Campus, Kuala Nerus, 21300, Terengganu, Malaysia
                [e ]Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA
                [f ]School of Marine Science and Fisheries, Jiangsu Ocean University, No. 59 Cangwu Road, Haizhou District, Lianyungang City, Jiangsu, China
                [g ]Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria
                [h ]Department of Agricultural Science, Faculty of Agro-Based Industry, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, 17600, Jeli, Kelantan, Malaysia
                [i ]Higher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE), Institute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Faculty of Fisheries and Food Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT), Kuala Nerus, 21030, Terengganu, Malaysia. diyananoordin@ 123456umt.edu.my
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author. Animal and Environmental Adaptation Program, Institute of Climate Adaptation and Marine Biotechnology (ICAMB), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT), Kuala Nerus, 21030, Terengganu, Malaysia. azramn@ 123456umt.edu.my
                Article
                S2405-8440(23)07289-4 e20081
                10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20081
                10559827
                37810135
                cd12a22d-08b3-4731-b599-2eeb1edc5a88
                © 2023 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 21 May 2023
                : 6 September 2023
                : 11 September 2023
                Categories
                Review Article

                freshwater fishes,african catfish,aeromonas infection,gonadotropin receptor,ictalurus punctatus (rafinesque),edwardsiella ictaluri,lipid metabolism,flavobacterium columnar

                Comments

                Comment on this article