3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The influence of the COVID-19 outbreak on European trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology: a survey of the impact on training and trainee

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The purpose of this study is to evaluate how the obstetrics and gynaecology residency program and trainees have been affected by the Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic in Europe.

          Study Design

          This study is a cross-sectional explorative survey using an online questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised of 40 questions that were subdivided into 4 subjects; workload, specialist training aspects in obstetrics and gynaecology, health and safety of the trainee and women’s health and maternal health issues. Inclusion criteria consisted of being a trainee in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ObGyn) at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe or trainees who had recently finished their training during the time of the outbreak. Taking part in the survey was voluntary. The questionnaire was shared on the website of the European Network for Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ENTOG), ENTOG social media, in the ENTOG-newsletter and through the national representatives of ENTOG.

          Results

          110 ObGyn trainees from 25 different countries responded to the questionnaire. Almost all trainees (95%, N = 105) reported an effect on their training due to COVID-19 pandemic. Training was interrupted in 21% of cases (n = 23). Trainees observed a decrease in educational activities or lectures and a decrease in number of patients. The possibility of training surgical skills decreased, because 67% (N = 74) trainees reported that surgeries were cancelled. Trainees expressed concerns about reaching the goals of their ObGyn specialist training in 60% (n = 66) of cases. A decrease in workload was experienced during the first COVID-19 wave in Europe by 60% (n = 66) of trainees. On average these trainees worked 33% less hours compared to a normal workweek. Although 22% (n = 24) were expected to be available continuously for 24 hours a day and 7 days a week for unscheduled duties, 15% (n = 16) were deployed to work on special COVID-units. Concerning preparation, 45% of the trainees (n = 50) had not received any training for treating COVID-positive patients. Trainees claimed to have enough personal protective equipment (PPE), although problems were reported. Any form of psychosocial support was arranged for 65% of trainees (n = 71) by the hospital or department. The results of the survey suggest that obstetric care was not affected much (92% (n = 102) of the respondents said at least necessary care continued) while patients in need for reproductive medicine were affected the most; out of the 110 departments 58% (n = 60) were closed and 35% (n = 36) reduced their activities. Access to family planning and benign gynaecology were also significantly reduced; 77% and 87% respectively of the departments were less accessible or only open to emergency cases.

          Conclusion

          COVID-19 pandemic has had a tremendous effect on the ObGyn training in Europe. Exposure to learning opportunities, surgeries and teaching has been decreased during the outbreak and may result in a decrease in quality of care provided to women in the future if impairment of training is not recovered.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Using Technology to Maintain the Education of Residents During the COVID-19 Pandemic

          Background The COVID-19 pandemic presents a unique challenge to surgical residency programs. Due to the restrictions recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other organizations, the educational landscape for surgical residents is rapidly changing. In addition, the time course of these changes is undefined. Methods We attempt to define the scope of the problem of maintaining surgical resident education while maintaining the safety of residents, educators, and patients. Within the basic framework of limiting in-person gatherings, postponing or canceling elective operations in hospitals, and limiting rotations between sites, we propose innovative solutions to maintain rigorous education. Results We propose several innovative solutions including the flipped classroom model, online practice questions, teleconferencing in place of in-person lectures, involving residents in telemedicine clinics, procedural simulation, and the facilitated use of surgical videos. Although there is no substitute for hands-on learning through operative experience and direct patient care, these may be ways to mitigate the loss of learning exposure during this time. Conclusions These innovative solutions utilizing technology may help to bridge the educational gap for surgical residents during this unprecedented circumstance. The support of national organizations may be beneficial in maintaining rigorous surgical education.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Impact of COVID-19 on Medical Education

            In the wake of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, it is abundantly clear to all the necessity of studying the pathology and widespread health consequences associated with the virus. However, what is much less clear is the impact of COVID-19 on medical education. Already, faculty and medical students are grappling with the changes that have been made and attempting to consolidate these with their plan of career development. Changes that may seem relatively minor in comparison to the global pandemic have the potential to be drastic turning points in the career progression of many. As not much is known regarding the long-lasting impact of COVID-19 on medical education, it is therefore also necessary to record and study the full impact of the changes being made. The path to entering a successful residency has been predictable for the last few years - do well on Step 1, give conference presentations, go the extra mile in clerkships and shadowing opportunities, and have meaningful non-academic extracurricular activities - all of which designed to best demonstrate a student's knowledge, persistence, collaborative spirit, and dedication to medicine. This trajectory has been changed with COVID-19 disrupting routines in hospitals, medical schools and beyond. The replacement of in-person classes with online equivalents is an obvious necessity at this time but creates a loss of collaborative experiences that has the potential to be a significant detriment to education. Likewise, the cancellation of clerkships, which are necessary for both skill acquisition as well as for relationship building, is a serious issue which students and medical schools must now resolve. Many medical students have also lost the opportunity for personal development through conference presentations. These presentations play a large role in distinguishing applicants during the residency application process, and therefore these lost opportunities have the potential to be a serious detriment to medical students’ career trajectory. While implementing technology to help resolve these issues is a unique way to help students to develop these skills, it is now necessary for medical students to demonstrate the same set of skills which they would have previously in a completely new and innovative manner. Persistence and adaptability during this time of challenge are attributes that medical students can demonstrate more readily. While every student has a personal story of how COVID-19 has impacted their education, there is no question that the impacts of COVID-19 will be felt on an extensive level. The panic in the community is palpable, and many are confused by how to proceed in the wake of COVID-19. This is no different for medical students and faculty and the questions that arise regarding medical education and their future careers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Collateral damage of COVID‐19 pandemic: Delayed medical care

              Abstract During the COVID‐19 pandemic, emergency room visits have drastically decreased for non‐COVID conditions such as appendicitis, heart attack, and stroke. Patients may be avoiding seeking medical attention for fear of catching the deadly condition or as an unintended consequence of stay‐at‐home orders. This delay in seeking care can lead to increased morbidity and mortality, which has not been figured in the assessment of the extent of damage caused by this pandemic. This case illustrates an example of “collateral damage” caused by the COVID‐19 pandemic. What would have been a standard ST‐elevation myocardial infarction treated with timely and successful stenting of a dominant right coronary artery occlusion, became a much more dangerous postinfarction ventricular septal defect; all because of a 2‐day delay in seeking medical attention by an unsuspecting patient.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
                Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
                European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology
                Elsevier B.V.
                0301-2115
                1872-7654
                10 April 2021
                10 April 2021
                Affiliations
                [a ]Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512VA, The Hague, The Netherlands
                [b ]Tommy’s National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
                [c ]Kackar State Hospital, 53340, Pazar, Rize, Turkey
                [d ]Gynecologic Oncology Department, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 33 Polna Street, 60-535, Poznan, Poland
                [e ]Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca, IC 19, 2720-276, Amadora, Portugal
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Permanent address: Slauerhoffpad 55, 2321WG, Leiden, The Netherlands
                Article
                S0301-2115(21)00166-4
                10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.04.005
                8035806
                33892209
                cc777bcb-71e3-4aec-b5ea-9ef9bd296f31
                © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 20 November 2020
                : 16 February 2021
                : 7 April 2021
                Categories
                Full Length Article

                covid-19,entog,europe,gynaecology,obstetrics,training
                covid-19, entog, europe, gynaecology, obstetrics, training

                Comments

                Comment on this article