690
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: An update

      , , ,
      Hepatology
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references389

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population

          L Radloff (1977)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change

              The construction of a depression rating scale designed to be particularly sensitive to treatment effects is described. Ratings of 54 English and 52 Swedish patients on a 65 item comprehensive psychopathology scale were used to identify the 17 most commonly occurring symptoms in primary depressive illness in the combined sample. Ratings on these 17 items for 64 patients participating in studies of four different antidepressant drugs were used to create a depression scale consisting of the 10 items which showed the largest changes with treatment and the highest correlation to overall change. The inner-rater reliability of the new depression scale was high. Scores on the scale correlated significantly with scores on a standard rating scale for depression, the Hamilton Rating Scale (HRS), indicating its validity as a general severity estimate. Its capacity to differentiate between responders and non-responders to antidepressant treatment was better than the HRS, indicating greater sensitivity to change. The practical and ethical implications in terms of smaller sample sizes in clinical trials are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hepatology
                Hepatology
                Wiley
                02709139
                April 2009
                April 2009
                December 02 2008
                : 49
                : 4
                : 1335-1374
                Article
                10.1002/hep.22759
                7477893
                19330875
                cafc0632-10d1-4134-b9f4-c31afbecc652
                © 2008

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article