8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Novel reliability criteria for controlled attenuation parameter assessments for non‐invasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is conflicting evidence regarding reliability criteria for the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP; a marker for hepatic steatosis [HS]). Thus, we assessed the diagnostic performance of CAP according to different reliability criteria based on real-world data from an academic centre. Patients undergoing measurement of CAP and liver biopsy (±6 months) at the Medical University of Vienna were included. HS was assessed according to SAF score. In total 319 patients were included. The main aetiologies were non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD, n  = 177, 55.5%), viral hepatitis ( n  = 49, 15.4%), and alcoholic liver disease (ALD, n  = 29, 9.1%). Histological steatosis and fibrosis stages were: S0: 93 (29.2%), S1: 100 (31.3%), S2: 67 (21.0%), and S3: 59 (18.5%); F0/F1: 150 (47.0%), F2: 47 (14.7%), and F3/F4: 122 (48.3%). In the overall cohort, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of CAP was 0.843 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.798–0.887) for diagnosing HS ≥ S1), 0.789 (95%CI: 0.740–0.839) for ≥S2, and 0.767 (95%CI: 0.712–0.823) for S3. CAP corrections as suggested by Karlas et al. did not improve the diagnostic performance. Importantly, the AUC of CAP for HS ≥ S1 was numerically highest in patients with CAP-IQR/median<0.10 or <0.20 (obtained in 37.9% and 74.9%), in whom CAP also had better diagnostic performance, as compared with patients not meeting these criteria. Moreover, it was substantially higher in 288 (90.3%) patients with CAP-IQR/median<0.3: 0.856 (95%CI: 0.809–0.903) vs. patients not meeting this criterion (0.530 [95%CI: 0.309–0.751]). In contrast, the previously suggested reliability criterion of CAP-IQR<40 dB/m was not associated with an improved diagnostic performance for HS≥S1 (0.866 [95%CI: 0.812–0.920] vs. 0.799 [95%CI: 0.717–0.881]) and was only obtained in 199 (62.4%) patients. CAP-IQR/median<0.1, <0.2, and <0.3 identify reliable measurements for diagnosing any hepatic steatosis (≥S1). Importantly, CAP-IQR/median<0.3 has a considerably higher applicability in clinical practice, as compared with the previously suggested CAP-IQR<40 dB/m criterion.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reproducibility of Liver Biopsy Diagnosis in Relation to the Size of the Specimen

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Further delineation of fibrosis progression in NAFLD: evidence from a large cohort of patients with sequential biopsies

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient and transjugular liver biopsy

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                United European Gastroenterology Journal
                United European Gastroenterol. j.
                SAGE Publications
                2050-6406
                2050-6414
                April 2020
                April 2020
                April 2020
                : 8
                : 3
                : 321-331
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDepartment of Internal Medicine IIIMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
                [2 ]Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic LaboratoryMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
                [3 ]Clinical Institute of PathologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
                [4 ]Division of General SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
                Article
                10.1177/2050640619900820
                7184665
                32213023
                c96ac2fc-46d6-4055-b812-dfa66fb11f60
                © 2020

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content1,210

                Cited by19

                Most referenced authors44