7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Trends in health and health inequality during the Japanese economic stagnation: Implications for a healthy planet

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Human health and wellbeing may depend on economic growth, the implication being that policymakers need to choose between population health and the health of ecosystems. Over two decades of low economic growth, Japan's life expectancy grew. Here we assess the temporal changes of subjective health and health inequality during the long-term low economic growth period.

          Methods

          Eight triennial cross-sectional nationally representative surveys in Japan over the period of economic stagnation from 1992 to 2013 were used (n = 625,262). Health is defined positively as wellbeing, and negatively as poor health, based on self-rated health. We used Slope and Relative Indices of Inequality to model inequalities in self-rated health based on household income. Temporal changes in health and health inequalities over time were examined separately for children/adolescents, working-age adults, young-old and old-old.

          Results

          At the end of the period of economic stagnation (2013), compared to the beginning (1992), the overall prevalence of wellbeing declined slightly in all age groups. However, poor health was stable or declined in the young-old and old-old, respectively, and increased only in working-age adults (Prevalence ratio: 1.14, 95% CI 1.08, 1.20, <0.001). Over time, inequality in wellbeing and poor self-rated health were observed in adults but less consistently for children, but the inequalities did not widen in any age group between the start and end of the stagnation period.

          Conclusions

          Although this study was a case study of one country, Japan, and inference to other countries cannot be made with certainty, the findings provide evidence that low economic growth over two decades did not inevitably translate to unfavourable population health. Japanese health inequalities according to income were stable during the study period. Therefore, this study highlighted the possibility that for high-income countries, low economic growth may be compatible with good population health.

          Highlights

          • Low economic growth may worsen mortality and life expectancy trends.

          • We used a Japanese population-based survey series encompassing low growth period.

          • A long period of low economic growth did not inevitably worsen population health.

          • Low economic growth and population health are not a trade-off.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Self-Rated Health and Mortality: A Review of Twenty-Seven Community Studies

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. A meta-analysis.

              Health planners and policy makers are increasingly asking for a feasible method to identify vulnerable persons with the greatest health needs. We conducted a systematic review of the association between a single item assessing general self-rated health (GSRH) and mortality. Systematic MEDLINE and EMBASE database searches for studies published from January 1966 to September 2003. Two investigators independently searched English language prospective, community-based cohort studies that reported (1) all-cause mortality, (2) a question assessing GSRH; and (3) an adjusted relative risk or equivalent. The investigators searched the citations to determine inclusion eligibility and abstracted data by following a standardized protocol. Of the 163 relevant studies identified, 22 cohorts met the inclusion criteria. Using a random effects model, compared with persons reporting "excellent" health status, the relative risk (95% confidence interval) for all-cause mortality was 1.23 [1.09, 1.39], 1.44 [1.21, 1.71], and 1.92 [1.64, 2.25] for those reporting "good,"fair," and "poor" health status, respectively. This relationship was robust in sensitivity analyses, limited to studies that adjusted for co-morbid illness, functional status, cognitive status, and depression, and across subgroups defined by gender and country of origin. Persons with "poor" self-rated health had a 2-fold higher mortality risk compared with persons with "excellent" self-rated health. Subjects' responses to a simple, single-item GSRH question maintained a strong association with mortality even after adjustment for key covariates such as functional status, depression, and co-morbidity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                SSM Popul Health
                SSM Popul Health
                SSM - Population Health
                Elsevier
                2352-8273
                06 February 2023
                June 2023
                06 February 2023
                : 22
                : 101356
                Affiliations
                [a ]Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
                [b ]Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
                [c ]Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
                [d ]Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
                [e ]Stress Research Institute, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
                [f ]Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
                [g ]Institute for Global Health and Medicine, Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
                [h ]Department of Social Epidemiology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. . Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. ayako.hiyoshi@ 123456oru.se
                Article
                S2352-8273(23)00021-6 101356
                10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101356
                9958394
                36852377
                c9051f8b-62fc-4446-980c-44e3f79126ad
                © 2023 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 24 November 2022
                : 26 January 2023
                : 4 February 2023
                Categories
                Regular Article

                wellbeing,self-rated health,health inequalities,planetary health,sustainable development goals,gdp,epidemiology,de-growth,economic stagnation,gdp, sustainable development goal,uk, the united kingdom,us, the united states

                Comments

                Comment on this article