11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sympatry and resource partitioning between the largest krill consumers around the Antarctic Peninsula

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Understanding how closely related, sympatric species distribute themselves relative to their environment is critical to understanding ecosystem structure and function and predicting effects of environmental variation. The Antarctic Peninsula supports high densities of krill and krill consumers; however, the region is warming rapidly, with unknown consequences. Humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae and Antarctic minke whales Balaenoptera bonaerensis are the largest krill consumers here, yet key data gaps remain about their distribution, behavior, and interactions and how these will be impacted by changing conditions. Using satellite telemetry and novel spatial point-process modeling techniques, we quantified habitat use of each species relative to dynamic environmental variables and determined overlap in core habitat areas during summer months when sea ice is at a minimum. We found that humpback whales ranged broadly over continental shelf waters, utilizing nearshore bays, while minke whales restricted their movements to sheltered bays and areas where ice is present. This presents a scenario where minke whale core habitat overlaps substantially with the broader home ranges of humpback whales. While there is no indication that prey is limiting in this ecosystem, increased overlap between these species may arise as climate-driven changes that affect the extent, timing, and duration of seasonal sea ice decrease the amount of preferred foraging habitat for minke whales while concurrently increasing it for humpback whales. Our results provide the first quantitative assessment of behaviorally based habitat use and sympatry between these 2 krill consumers and offers insight into the potential effects of a rapidly changing environment on the structure and function of a polar ecosystem.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Marine Ecology Progress Series
          Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
          Inter-Research Science Center
          0171-8630
          1616-1599
          July 08 2021
          July 08 2021
          : 669
          : 1-16
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Institute for Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, 115 McAllister Way, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA
          [2 ]Marine Mammal Institute, Oregon State University, 2030 Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR 97365, USA
          [3 ]Division of Marine Science and Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University Marine Laboratory, 135 Duke Marine Lab Road, Beaufort, NC 28516, USA
          [4 ]Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
          [5 ]Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, 120 Oceanview Boulevard, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA
          [6 ]Australian Antarctic Division, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania 7050, Australia
          Article
          10.3354/meps13771
          c79e0813-a4e4-4ffa-91b2-8237841d71bf
          © 2021

          Free to read

          https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article