1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Optimal allocation to treatment sequences in individually randomized stepped-wedge designs with attrition

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background/aims:

          The stepped-wedge design has been extensively studied in the setting of the cluster randomized trial, but less so for the individually randomized trial. This article derives the optimal allocation of individuals to treatment sequences. The focus is on designs where all individuals start in the control condition and at the beginning of each time period some of them cross over to the intervention, so that at the end of the trial all of them receive the intervention.

          Methods:

          The statistical model that takes into account the nesting of repeated measurements within subjects is presented. It is also shown how possible attrition is taken into account. The effect of the intervention is assumed to be sustained so that it does not change after the treatment switch. An exponential decay correlation structure is assumed, implying that the correlation between any two time point decreases with the time lag. Matrix algebra is used to derive the relation between the allocation of units to treatment sequences and the variance of the treatment effect estimator. The optimal allocation is the one that results in smallest variance.

          Results:

          Results are presented for three to six treatment sequences. It is shown that the optimal allocation highly depends on the correlation parameter ρ and attrition rate r between any two adjacent time points. The uniform allocation, where each treatment sequence has the same number of individuals, is often not the most efficient. For 0 . 1 ρ 0 . 9 and r = 0 , 0 . 05 , 0 . 2 , its efficiency relative to the optimal allocation is at least 0.8. It is furthermore shown how a constrained optimal allocation can be derived in case the optimal allocation is not feasible from a practical point of view.

          Conclusion:

          This article provides the methodology for designing individually randomized stepped-wedge designs, taking into account the possibility of attrition. As such it helps researchers to plan their trial in an efficient way. To use the methodology, prior estimates of the degree of attrition and intraclass correlation coefficient are needed. It is advocated that researchers clearly report the estimates of these quantities to help facilitate planning future trials.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.

          Cluster randomized trials (CRT) are often used to evaluate therapies or interventions in situations where individual randomization is not possible or not desirable for logistic, financial or ethical reasons. While a significant and rapidly growing body of literature exists on CRTs utilizing a "parallel" design (i.e. I clusters randomized to each treatment), only a few examples of CRTs using crossover designs have been described. In this article we discuss the design and analysis of a particular type of crossover CRT - the stepped wedge - and provide an example of its use.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Cross‐over Trials In Clinical Research

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Trials
                Clin Trials
                CTJ
                spctj
                Clinical Trials (London, England)
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1740-7745
                1740-7753
                24 February 2023
                June 2023
                : 20
                : 3
                : 242-251
                Affiliations
                [1-17407745231154260]Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*]Mirjam Moerbeek, Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, PO Box 80140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands. Email: m.moerbeek@ 123456uu.nl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5537-1237
                Article
                10.1177_17407745231154260
                10.1177/17407745231154260
                10262341
                36825509
                c6e2d9a6-0e2c-4da5-b513-e61163af7e25
                © The Author(s) 2023

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                Medicine
                staggered intervention,optimal allocation,stepped-wedge trial,constrained optimization

                Comments

                Comment on this article