15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to this journal, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An exploratory study on becoming a traditional spiritual healer among Baganda in Central Uganda

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Traditional medicinal knowledge and healing practices of indigenous spiritual healers play important roles in health care, and contribute towards achieving Universal Health Care. Traditional spiritual healers (TSHs) are grouped into three categories. One category of Baganda TSHs, Balubaale, engage ancestral spirits during health management. Balubaale are socially significant but not legally accepted. Their initiation and training practices have not been documented in Uganda. The study purpose was to understand and establish the training of traditional spiritual healers. Twelve (10M, 2F); practicing TSHs in Central Uganda were purposively selected and recruited between 15 th July 2019 and 29 th April 2020, and were prospectively interacted with for 24 months. Transcribed data was coded and thematically analyzed using ATLAS ti. 22 computer software and presented based on an inductive approach. Findings show key areas of TSHs training include connecting with ancestral spirits and the spiritual powers of non-materials and materials such as living and non-living things through rituals. Spiritual healers train in diagnosis and health management based on ancestral spirits and they finally pass out in a communal ceremony witnessed by family and community members. We conclude that TSHs undergo training and are supervised and supported by experienced spiritualists, family and the community. We recommend similar studies among other ethnic groups to contextualize the process of becoming a TSH, compare and harmonize findings to facilitate inter-medical systems communication and policy considerations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.

              Varying philosophical and theoretical orientations to qualitative inquiry remind us that issues of quality and credibility intersect with audience and intended research purposes. This overview examines ways of enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis by dealing with three distinct but related inquiry concerns: rigorous techniques and methods for gathering and analyzing qualitative data, including attention to validity, reliability, and triangulation; the credibility, competence, and perceived trustworthiness of the qualitative researcher; and the philosophical beliefs of evaluation users about such paradigm-based preferences as objectivity versus subjectivity, truth versus perspective, and generalizations versus extrapolations. Although this overview examines some general approaches to issues of credibility and data quality in qualitative analysis, it is important to acknowledge that particular philosophical underpinnings, specific paradigms, and special purposes for qualitative inquiry will typically include additional or substitute criteria for assuring and judging quality, validity, and credibility. Moreover, the context for these considerations has evolved. In early literature on evaluation methods the debate between qualitative and quantitative methodologists was often strident. In recent years the debate has softened. A consensus has gradually emerged that the important challenge is to match appropriately the methods to empirical questions and issues, and not to universally advocate any single methodological approach for all problems.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLOS Glob Public Health
                PLOS Glob Public Health
                plos
                PLOS Global Public Health
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                2767-3375
                25 April 2024
                2024
                : 4
                : 4
                : e0002581
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Pharmacy, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
                [2 ] Research and Training Department, Dr. Sekagya Institute of Traditional Medicine, Uganda
                [3 ] Department of Environment and Livelihoods Support Systems, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
                [4 ] University of Transdisciplinary Health Sciences and Technology, Bengaluru, India
                [5 ] Department of Community Health, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
                PLOS: Public Library of Science, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9721-7158
                Article
                PGPH-D-23-02058
                10.1371/journal.pgph.0002581
                11045116
                38662715
                c696c811-0c39-40a5-b1c6-be8dfd610506
                © 2024 Sekagya et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 16 October 2023
                : 25 March 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Pages: 19
                Funding
                This work was supported by The Africa Centre of Excellence (ACEII) for Pharm-Biotechnology and Traditional Medicine (PHARMBIOTRAC) under Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda (P151847) to YHKS. The funders did not play any role in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. No relevant grant or award recipients are specifically associated with the funding received for this study.
                Categories
                Research Article
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Educational Status
                Trainees
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Africa
                Uganda
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Culture
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Human Families
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Complementary and Alternative Medicine
                Traditional Medicine
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Policy
                Social Sciences
                Anthropology
                Cultural Anthropology
                Religion
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Religion
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Otorhinolaryngology
                Otology
                Custom metadata
                Data is contained within the paper.

                Comments

                Comment on this article