14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      “Where’s My Mentor?!” Characterizing Negative Mentoring Experiences in Undergraduate Life Science Research

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Undergraduate research experiences in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields are championed for promoting students’ personal and professional development. Mentorship is an integral part of undergraduate research, as effective mentorship maximizes the benefits undergraduates realize from participating in research. Yet almost no research examines instances in which mentoring is less effective or even problematic, even though prior research on mentoring in workplace settings suggests negative mentoring experiences are common. Here, we report the results of a qualitative study to define and characterize negative mentoring experiences of undergraduate life science researchers. Undergraduate researchers in our study reported seven major ways they experienced negative mentoring: absenteeism, abuse of power, interpersonal mismatch, lack of career support, lack of psychosocial support, misaligned expectations, and unequal treatment. They described some of these experiences as the result of absence of positive mentoring behavior and others as actively harmful behavior, both of which they perceive as detrimental to their psychosocial and career development. Our results are useful to mentors for reflecting on ways their behaviors might be perceived as harmful or unhelpful. These findings can also serve as a foundation for future research aimed at examining the prevalence and impact of negative mentoring experiences in undergraduate research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Consequences of Abusive Supervision

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Phases of the Mentor Relationship.

            K. Kram (1983)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Toward a Model of Social Influence that Explains Minority Student Integration into the Scientific Community.

              Students from several ethnic minority groups are underrepresented in the sciences, such that minority students more frequently drop out of the scientific career path than non-minority students. Viewed from a perspective of social influence, this pattern suggests that minority students do not integrate into the scientific community at the same rate as non-minority students. Kelman (1958, 2006) describes a tripartite integration model of social influence (TIMSI) by which a person orients to a social system. To test if this model predicts integration into the scientific community, we conducted analyses of data from a national panel of minority science students. A structural equation model framework showed that self-efficacy (operationalized consistent with Kelman's 'rule-orientation') predicted student intentions to pursue a scientific career. However, when identification as a scientist and internalization of values are added to the model, self-efficacy becomes a poorer predictor of intention. Additional mediation analyses support the conclusion that while having scientific self-efficacy is important, identifying with and endorsing the values of the social system reflect a deeper integration and more durable motivation to persist as a scientist.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Monitoring Editor
                Journal
                CBE Life Sci Educ
                CBE Life Sci Educ
                CBE-LSE
                CBE-LSE
                lse
                CBE Life Sciences Education
                American Society for Cell Biology
                1931-7913
                Winter 2019
                : 18
                : 4
                : ar61
                Affiliations
                []Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
                [§ ]Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968
                []Department of Biology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22802
                []Center for Research on Learning and Technology, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
                Author notes

                Co–second authors (listed in alphabetical order).

                *Address correspondence to: Erin L. Dolan ( eldolan@ 123456uga.edu ).
                Article
                CBE.19-02-0036
                10.1187/cbe.19-02-0036
                6889840
                31755819
                c60c1b8a-8eae-4088-90d3-f9a6009477e6
                © 2019 L. B. Limeri et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2019 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology.

                This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License.

                History
                : 11 February 2019
                : 23 July 2019
                : 30 August 2019
                Categories
                Article

                Education
                Education

                Comments

                Comment on this article