17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Promoting planting in front gardens: a systematic approach to intervention development

      other
      1 , 2 , * , , 3 , 4
      UCL Open Environment
      UCL Press
      Behaviour Change Wheel, biodiversity conservation, front gardens, gardening, public engagement, public health, sustainability

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Planting in front gardens is associated with a range of human and environmental health benefits. Effective interventions aimed at cultivating this practice are, however, hampered by the paucity of theory- and evidence-based behavioural research in this context. This study aims to systematically determine a set of behaviour change interventions likely to be effective at promoting planting in front gardens amongst UK householders. The Behaviour Change Wheel framework was applied. Behavioural systems mapping was used to identify community actors relevant to front gardening. Potential behavioural influences on householders’ front gardening were identified using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour model. Using peer-reviewed scientific findings as evidence, behavioural influences were systematically linked to potential intervention strategies, behaviour change techniques and real-world implementation options. Finally, intervention recommendations were refined through expert evaluations and local councillor and public stakeholder feedback, evaluating them against the Acceptability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Affordability, Side effects and Equity criteria in a UK implementation context. This study formulated 12 intervention recommendations, implementable at a community level, to promote front gardening. Stakeholder feedback revealed a preference for educational and supportive (social and practical) strategies (e.g., community gardening workshops, front gardening ‘starter kits’) over persuasive and motivational approaches (e.g., social marketing, motivational letters from the council to householders). Householders’ front gardening behaviour is complex and influenced by the behaviour of many other community actors. It also needs to be understood as a step in a continuum of other behaviours (e.g., clearing land, gardening, waste disposal). This study demonstrates the application of behavioural science to an understudied implementation context, that is, front gardening promotion, drawing on a rigorous development process promoting a transparent approach to intervention design. Stakeholder consultation allowed relevance, feasibility and practical issues to be considered. These improve the likely effectiveness of interventions in practice. The next steps include evaluating the proposed interventions in practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance

          Evaluating complex interventions is complicated. The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task. Now the council has updated its guidance
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions.

            CONSORT guidelines call for precise reporting of behavior change interventions: we need rigorous methods of characterizing active content of interventions with precision and specificity. The objective of this study is to develop an extensive, consensually agreed hierarchically structured taxonomy of techniques [behavior change techniques (BCTs)] used in behavior change interventions. In a Delphi-type exercise, 14 experts rated labels and definitions of 124 BCTs from six published classification systems. Another 18 experts grouped BCTs according to similarity of active ingredients in an open-sort task. Inter-rater agreement amongst six researchers coding 85 intervention descriptions by BCTs was assessed. This resulted in 93 BCTs clustered into 16 groups. Of the 26 BCTs occurring at least five times, 23 had adjusted kappas of 0.60 or above. "BCT taxonomy v1," an extensive taxonomy of 93 consensually agreed, distinct BCTs, offers a step change as a method for specifying interventions, but we anticipate further development and evaluation based on international, interdisciplinary consensus.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance

              The UK Medical Research Council’s widely used guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions has been replaced by a new framework, commissioned jointly by the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research, which takes account of recent developments in theory and methods and the need to maximise the efficiency, use, and impact of research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                UCL Open Environ
                UCL Open Environ
                UCLOE
                UCL Open Environment
                UCL Press (UK )
                2632-0886
                24 May 2024
                2024
                : 6
                : e3147
                Affiliations
                [1 ]UCL Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London (UCL), 1-19 Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7HB, UK
                [2 ]UCL Plastic Waste Innovation Hub, University College London (UCL), 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4TJ, UK
                [3 ]Department of Primary Care and Public Health, University College London (UCL), UCL Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK
                [4 ]The Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London (UCL), 1-19 Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7HB, UK
                Author notes
                *Corresponding author: E-mail: ayse.allison.18@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6387-1984
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3523-0052
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5466-3606
                Article
                10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3147
                11152043
                38841425
                c5c56116-c6e1-4cb4-9b8a-fff4e446de38
                © 2024 The Author.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY) 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 24 February 2024
                : 26 April 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 7, References: 58, Pages: 25
                Categories
                Methodology

                behaviour change wheel,biodiversity conservation,front gardens,gardening,public engagement,public health,sustainability

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content172

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors602