8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prescribing errors in post - COVID-19 patients: prevalence, severity, and risk factors in patients visiting a post - COVID-19 outpatient clinic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has challenged healthcare globally. An acute increase in the number of hospitalized patients has necessitated a rigorous reorganization of hospital care, thereby creating circumstances that previously have been identified as facilitating prescribing errors (PEs), e.g. a demanding work environment, a high turnover of doctors, and prescribing beyond expertise. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients may be at risk of PEs, potentially resulting in patient harm. We determined the prevalence, severity, and risk factors for PEs in post–COVID-19 patients, hospitalized during the first wave of COVID-19 in the Netherlands, 3 months after discharge.

          Methods

          This prospective observational cohort study recruited patients who visited a post-COVID-19 outpatient clinic of an academic hospital in the Netherlands, 3 months after COVID-19 hospitalization, between June 1 and October 1 2020. All patients with appointments were eligible for inclusion. The prevalence and severity of PEs were assessed in a multidisciplinary consensus meeting. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated by univariate and multivariate analysis to identify independent risk factors for PEs.

          Results

          Ninety-eight patients were included, of whom 92% had ≥1 PE and 8% experienced medication-related harm requiring an immediate change in medication therapy to prevent detoriation. Overall, 68% of all identified PEs were made during or after the COVID-19 related hospitalization. Multivariate analyses identified ICU admission (OR 6.08, 95% CI 2.16–17.09) and a medical history of COPD / asthma (OR 5.36, 95% CI 1.34–21.5) as independent risk factors for PEs.

          Conclusions

          PEs occurred frequently during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Patients admitted to an ICU during COVID-19 hospitalization or who had a medical history of COPD / asthma were at risk of PEs. These risk factors can be used to identify high-risk patients and to implement targeted interventions. Awareness of prescribing safely is crucial to prevent harm in this new patient population.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-022-00588-7.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review

          The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, due to the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has caused a worldwide sudden and substantial increase in hospitalizations for pneumonia with multiorgan disease. This review discusses current evidence regarding the pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and management of COVID-19.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial

            Background Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have been found to be efficient on SARS-CoV-2, and reported to be efficient in Chinese COV-19 patients. We evaluate the role of hydroxychloroquine on respiratory viral loads. Patients and methods French Confirmed COVID-19 patients were included in a single arm protocol from early March to March 16th, to receive 600mg of hydroxychloroquine daily and their viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs was tested daily in a hospital setting. Depending on their clinical presentation, azithromycin was added to the treatment. Untreated patients from another center and cases refusing the protocol were included as negative controls. Presence and absence of virus at Day6-post inclusion was considered the end point. Results Six patients were asymptomatic, 22 had upper respiratory tract infection symptoms and eight had lower respiratory tract infection symptoms. Twenty cases were treated in this study and showed a significant reduction of the viral carriage at D6-post inclusion compared to controls, and much lower average carrying duration than reported of untreated patients in the literature. Azithromycin added to hydroxychloroquine was significantly more efficient for virus elimination. Conclusion Despite its small sample size our survey shows that hydroxychloroquine treatment is significantly associated with viral load reduction/disappearance in COVID-19 patients and its effect is reinforced by azithromycin.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Compassionate Use of Remdesivir for Patients with Severe Covid-19

              Abstract Background Remdesivir, a nucleotide analogue prodrug that inhibits viral RNA polymerases, has shown in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2. Methods We provided remdesivir on a compassionate-use basis to patients hospitalized with Covid-19, the illness caused by infection with SARS-CoV-2. Patients were those with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who had an oxygen saturation of 94% or less while they were breathing ambient air or who were receiving oxygen support. Patients received a 10-day course of remdesivir, consisting of 200 mg administered intravenously on day 1, followed by 100 mg daily for the remaining 9 days of treatment. This report is based on data from patients who received remdesivir during the period from January 25, 2020, through March 7, 2020, and have clinical data for at least 1 subsequent day. Results Of the 61 patients who received at least one dose of remdesivir, data from 8 could not be analyzed (including 7 patients with no post-treatment data and 1 with a dosing error). Of the 53 patients whose data were analyzed, 22 were in the United States, 22 in Europe or Canada, and 9 in Japan. At baseline, 30 patients (57%) were receiving mechanical ventilation and 4 (8%) were receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. During a median follow-up of 18 days, 36 patients (68%) had an improvement in oxygen-support class, including 17 of 30 patients (57%) receiving mechanical ventilation who were extubated. A total of 25 patients (47%) were discharged, and 7 patients (13%) died; mortality was 18% (6 of 34) among patients receiving invasive ventilation and 5% (1 of 19) among those not receiving invasive ventilation. Conclusions In this cohort of patients hospitalized for severe Covid-19 who were treated with compassionate-use remdesivir, clinical improvement was observed in 36 of 53 patients (68%). Measurement of efficacy will require ongoing randomized, placebo-controlled trials of remdesivir therapy. (Funded by Gilead Sciences.)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                r.mahomedradja@amsterdamumc.nl
                Journal
                BMC Emerg Med
                BMC Emerg Med
                BMC Emergency Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-227X
                5 March 2022
                5 March 2022
                2022
                : 22
                : 35
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.16872.3a, ISNI 0000 0004 0435 165X, Department of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, , Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]GRID grid.16872.3a, ISNI 0000 0004 0435 165X, Department of Internal Medicine, Research and Expertise Center in Pharmacotherapy Education (RECIPE), , Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]GRID grid.16872.3a, ISNI 0000 0004 0435 165X, Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine Section, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Institute, , Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [4 ]GRID grid.509540.d, ISNI 0000 0004 6880 3010, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, , Amsterdam UMC location AMC and location VUmc, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [5 ]GRID grid.12380.38, ISNI 0000 0004 1754 9227, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, , Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [6 ]GRID grid.16872.3a, ISNI 0000 0004 0435 165X, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, , Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [7 ]GRID grid.12380.38, ISNI 0000 0004 1754 9227, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, , Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, ; De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Article
                588
                10.1186/s12873-022-00588-7
                8897739
                35247982
                c211997b-079f-4cd3-a58e-6768cb2b987c
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 19 October 2021
                : 14 February 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                covid-19,prescribing errors,pharmacotherapeutic stewardship,clinical pharmacology

                Comments

                Comment on this article