18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differences in risk perception, knowledge and protective behaviour regarding COVID-19 by education level among women and men in Germany. Results from the COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO) study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The main strategy for combatting SARS-CoV-2 infections in 2020 consisted of behavioural regulations including contact reduction, maintaining distance, hand hygiene, and mask wearing. COVID-19-related risk perception and knowledge may influence protective behaviour, and education could be an important determinant. The current study investigated differences by education level in risk perception, knowledge and protective behaviour regarding COVID-19 in Germany, exploring the development of the pandemic over time. The COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring study is a repeated cross-sectional online survey conducted during the pandemic in Germany from 3 March 2020 (waves 1–28: 27,957 participants aged 18–74). Differences in risk perception, knowledge and protective behaviour according to education level (high versus low) were analysed using linear and logistic regression. Time trends were accounted for by interaction terms for education level and calendar week. Regarding protective behaviour, interaction terms were tested for all risk perception and knowledge variables with education level. The strongest associations with education level were evident for perceived and factual knowledge regarding COVID-19. Moreover, associations were found between low education level and higher perceived severity, and between low education level and lower perceived probability. Highly educated men were more worried about COVID-19 than those with low levels of education. No educational differences were observed for perceived susceptibility or fear. Higher compliance with hand washing was found in highly educated women, and higher compliance with maintaining distance was found in highly educated men. Regarding maintaining distance, the impact of perceived severity differed between education groups. In men, significant moderation effects of education level on the association between factual knowledge and all three protective behaviours were found. During the pandemic, risk perception and protective behaviour varied greatly over time. Overall, differences by education level were relatively small. For risk communication, reaching all population groups irrespective of education level is critical.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online cross-sectional survey

          Unprecedented measures have been adopted to control the rapid spread of the ongoing COVID-19 epidemic in China. People's adherence to control measures is affected by their knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) towards COVID-19. In this study, we investigated Chinese residents' KAP towards COVID-19 during the rapid rise period of the outbreak. An online sample of Chinese residents was successfully recruited via the authors' networks with residents and popular media in Hubei, China. A self-developed online KAP questionnaire was completed by the participants. The knowledge questionnaire consisted of 12 questions regarding the clinical characteristics and prevention of COVID-19. Assessments on residents' attitudes and practices towards COVID-19 included questions on confidence in winning the battle against COVID-19 and wearing masks when going out in recent days. Among the survey completers (n=6910), 65.7% were women, 63.5% held a bachelor degree or above, and 56.2% engaged in mental labor. The overall correct rate of the knowledge questionnaire was 90%. The majority of the respondents (97.1%) had confidence that China can win the battle against COVID-19. Nearly all of the participants (98.0%) wore masks when going out in recent days. In multiple logistic regression analyses, the COVID-19 knowledge score (OR: 0.75-0.90, P<0.001) was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of negative attitudes and preventive practices towards COVID-2019. Most Chinese residents of a relatively high socioeconomic status, in particular women, are knowledgeable about COVID-19, hold optimistic attitudes, and have appropriate practices towards COVID-19. Health education programs aimed at improving COVID-19 knowledge are helpful for Chinese residents to hold optimistic attitudes and maintain appropriate practices. Due to the limited sample representativeness, we must be cautious when generalizing these findings to populations of a low socioeconomic status.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1

            A protection motivation theory is proposed that postulates the three crucial components of a fear appeal to be (a) the magnitude of noxiousness of a depicted event; (b) the probability of that event's occurrence; and (c) the efficacy of a protective response. Each of these communication variables initiates corresponding cognitive appraisal processes that mediate attitude change. The proposed conceptualization is a special case of a more comprehensive theoretical schema: expectancy-value theories. Several suggestions are offered for reinterpreting existing data, designing new types of empirical research, and making future studies more comparable. Finally, the principal advantages of protection motivation theory over the rival formulations of Janis and Leventhal are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                12 May 2021
                2021
                12 May 2021
                : 16
                : 5
                : e0251694
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
                [2 ] Federal Centre for Health Education, Cologne, Germany
                University of New South Wales, AUSTRALIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5093-2584
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5943-1361
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4826-9717
                Article
                PONE-D-21-03287
                10.1371/journal.pone.0251694
                8116045
                33979413
                c0a8a761-8284-4ad0-bac9-73e7939d6a08
                © 2021 Rattay et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 30 January 2021
                : 3 May 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 3, Pages: 26
                Funding
                Funded by: University of Erfurt (DE)
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001664, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft;
                Funded by: Robert Koch Institute (DE)
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007316, Klaus Tschira Stiftung;
                The COSMO study is funded by the University of Erfurt, the Leibniz Center and the Robert Koch Institute as well as by the Klaus Tschira Foundation. All authors are employees of the Robert Koch Institute or of the Federal Centre for Health Education, both federal institutes within the portfolio of the German Federal Ministry of Health. The funders had no role in analysis or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Education
                Educational Attainment
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Medical Risk Factors
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Infectious Diseases
                Viral Diseases
                Covid 19
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Pandemics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychological Attitudes
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychological Attitudes
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Hygiene
                Hand Washing
                Biology and life sciences
                Organisms
                Viruses
                RNA viruses
                Coronaviruses
                SARS coronavirus
                SARS CoV 2
                Biology and life sciences
                Microbiology
                Medical microbiology
                Microbial pathogens
                Viral pathogens
                Coronaviruses
                SARS coronavirus
                SARS CoV 2
                Medicine and health sciences
                Pathology and laboratory medicine
                Pathogens
                Microbial pathogens
                Viral pathogens
                Coronaviruses
                SARS coronavirus
                SARS CoV 2
                Biology and life sciences
                Organisms
                Viruses
                Viral pathogens
                Coronaviruses
                SARS coronavirus
                SARS CoV 2
                Custom metadata
                The data from the COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO) are stored in the repository PsychArchives ( https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2776) and are made available to scientists upon request. Requests should be submitted to the COSMO consortium by contacting Prof. Dr. Cornelia Betsch, University of Erfurt, Nordhäuser Str. 63, 99089 Erfurt, Germany ( cornelia.betsch@ 123456unierfurt.de ).
                COVID-19

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article