6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Introducing the Microbes and Social Equity Working Group: Considering the Microbial Components of Social, Environmental, and Health Justice

      discussion
      a , , b , c , d , e , f , g , h , i , j , k , l , m , n , o , p , p , q , r , s , s , i , o , t , u , v , w , x , y , z , z , aa , bb , cc , dd , ee , ff , gg , hh
      (ad hoc peer reviewer)
      mSystems
      American Society for Microbiology
      biopolitics, health disparities, social determinants of health, structural determinants of health, integrated research, microbiomes

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Humans are inextricably linked to each other and our natural world, and microorganisms lie at the nexus of those interactions. Microorganisms form genetically flexible, taxonomically diverse, and biochemically rich communities, i.e., microbiomes that are integral to the health and development of macroorganisms, societies, and ecosystems. Yet engagement with beneficial microbiomes is dictated by access to public resources, such as nutritious food, clean water and air, safe shelter, social interactions, and effective medicine. In this way, microbiomes have sociopolitical contexts that must be considered. The Microbes and Social Equity (MSE) Working Group connects microbiology with social equity research, education, policy, and practice to understand the interplay of microorganisms, individuals, societies, and ecosystems. Here, we outline opportunities for integrating microbiology and social equity work through broadening education and training; diversifying research topics, methods, and perspectives; and advocating for evidence-based public policy that supports sustainable, equitable, and microbial wealth for all.

          Related collections

          Most cited references158

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Scientists’ warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change

            In the Anthropocene, in which we now live, climate change is impacting most life on Earth. Microorganisms support the existence of all higher trophic life forms. To understand how humans and other life forms on Earth (including those we are yet to discover) can withstand anthropogenic climate change, it is vital to incorporate knowledge of the microbial ‘unseen majority’. We must learn not just how microorganisms affect climate change (including production and consumption of greenhouse gases) but also how they will be affected by climate change and other human activities. This Consensus Statement documents the central role and global importance of microorganisms in climate change biology. It also puts humanity on notice that the impact of climate change will depend heavily on responses of microorganisms, which are essential for achieving an environmentally sustainable future.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders.

              To assess the experienced or perceived barriers and facilitators to health research participation for major US racial/ethnic minority populations, we conducted a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies from a search on PubMed and Web of Science from January 2000 to December 2011. With 44 articles included in the review, we found distinct and shared barriers and facilitators. Despite different expressions of mistrust, all groups represented in these studies were willing to participate for altruistic reasons embedded in cultural and community priorities. Greater comparative understanding of barriers and facilitators to racial/ethnic minorities' research participation can improve population-specific recruitment and retention strategies and could better inform future large-scale prospective quantitative and in-depth ethnographic studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Role: ad hoc peer reviewer
                Journal
                mSystems
                mSystems
                msystems
                mSystems
                American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )
                2379-5077
                27 July 2021
                Jul-Aug 2021
                27 July 2021
                : 6
                : 4
                : e00471-21
                Affiliations
                [a ] University of Maine, School of Food and Agriculture, Orono, Maine, USA
                [b ] Centro de Estudios en Neurociencia Humana y Neuropsicología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
                [c ] Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
                [d ] Gonzaga University, Department of Biology, Spokane, Washington, USA
                [e ] grid.134563.6University of Arizona, , School of Anthropology, Tucson, Arizona, USA
                [f ] Stevens Institute of Technology, Science and Technology Studies, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA
                [g ] grid.189967.8Emory University, , Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                [h ] American International College of Arts and Sciences of Antigua, Antigua, Antigua and Barbuda, West Indies
                [i ] Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
                [j ] University of Sheffield, Department of Landscape Architecture, Sheffield, United Kingdom
                [k ] Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruzgrid.205975.c, , Santa Cruz, California, USA
                [l ] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Santa Cruz, California, USA
                [m ] Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
                [n ] Department of Genetics, Cell, and Development, grid.17635.36University of Minnesota, , Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
                [o ] University of Oregon, Biology and the Built Environment Center, Eugene, Oregon, USA
                [p ] School of the Environment, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
                [q ] Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
                [r ] Department of Ecological Science, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [s ] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Damegrid.131063.6, , Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
                [t ] University of San Francisco, Department of Biology, San Francisco, California, USA
                [u ] Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
                [v ] Social Science Program, University of Maine at Augusta, Augusta, Maine, USA
                [w ] University of Maine, Graduate School of Biomedical Science & Engineering, Bangor, Maine, USA
                [x ] Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA
                [y ] Field of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
                [z ] grid.94365.3dNational Institutes of Health, , Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
                [aa ] School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, grid.36425.36Stony Brook University, , Stony Brook, New York, USA
                [bb ] Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
                [cc ] Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
                [dd ] Eugene, Oregon, USA
                [ee ] Robert Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
                [ff ] Finch Therapeutics, Somerville, Massachusetts, USA
                [gg ] Environmental Studies Program, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA
                [hh ] Department of Philosophy, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA
                University of California San Diego
                School of Medicine, University of Colorado
                Author notes

                Citation Ishaq SL, Parada FJ, Wolf PG, Bonilla CY, Carney MA, Benezra A, Wissel E, Friedman M, DeAngelis KM, Robinson JM, Fahimipour AK, Manus MB, Grieneisen L, Dietz LG, Pathak A, Chauhan A, Kuthyar S, Stewart JD, Dasari MR, Nonnamaker E, Choudoir M, Horve PF, Zimmerman NB, Kozik AJ, Darling KW, Romero-Olivares AL, Hariharan J, Farmer N, Maki KA, Collier JL, O’Doherty KC, Letourneau J, Kline J, Moses PL, Morar N. 2021. Introducing the Microbes and Social Equity Working Group: considering the microbial components of social, environmental, and health justice. mSystems 6:e00471-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00471-21.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2615-8055
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9540-7118
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2275-8456
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5585-4551
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9138-3593
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3640-1781
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9151-7907
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9318-9249
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2168-6390
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0287-3043
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5535-4119
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4578-960X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2661-3676
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4786-7202
                Article
                mSystems00471-21
                10.1128/mSystems.00471-21
                8407420
                34313460
                c09557e2-6b55-4e3f-8c02-72a114ce3ce4
                Copyright © 2021 Ishaq et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

                History
                Page count
                supplementary-material: 0, Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 151, Pages: 12, Words: 9340
                Categories
                Perspective
                Editor's Pick
                editors-pick, Editor's Pick
                open-peer-review, Open Peer Review
                special-series-semrdme, Special Series: Social Equity as a Means of Resolving Disparities in Microbial Exposure
                conduct-of-scientific-research, Conduct of Scientific Research
                Custom metadata
                July/August 2021

                biopolitics,health disparities,social determinants of health,structural determinants of health,integrated research,microbiomes

                Comments

                Comment on this article