28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perceived facilitators and barriers to self-management in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury: a qualitative descriptive study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Current evidence has suggested the need for increased self-management support efforts in spinal cord injury (SCI) to reduce secondary complications. However, current self-management programs may not be suitable for the unique needs of individuals with SCI, including reduced mobility and the importance of attendant care. There is a need for greater understanding of the self-management strategies adopted by individuals with SCI and the potential need for a tailored self-management program. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to understand the perceived facilitators and barriers to self-management to prevent secondary complications.

          Methods

          A descriptive qualitative approach was used and involved telephone interviews. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals with traumatic SCI, their family members/caregivers, and managers from acute care/trauma and rehabilitation centres. Participants were recruited between September 2011 and May 2012. Analysis was conducted using inductive thematic analysis to understand the perceived facilitators and barriers to self-management to prevent secondary complications.

          Results

          A total of 26 interviews were conducted and they included 7 individuals with traumatic SCI, 7 family/caregivers (i.e., 7 SCI-caregiver dyads), and 12 acute care/rehabilitation managers from across the province of Ontario. The following five facilitators to self-management were identified: physical support from the caregiver, emotional support from the caregiver, peer support and feedback, importance of positive outlook and acceptance, and maintaining independence/control over care. The following five barriers to self-management were identified: caregiver burnout, funding and funding policies, lack of accessibility, physical limitations and secondary complications, and difficulties achieving positive outlook or mood.

          Conclusions

          This study demonstrated that the caregiver and the individual’s own mood/outlook, among other facilitators and barriers, make significant contributions to the self-management of individuals with traumatic SCI. The issues of timing/readiness and comorbidities and aging were observed across many of these themes. As such, the development of a tailored self-management program for individuals with traumatic SCI and their caregivers should incorporate these considerations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes.

          To assess the 1- and 2-year health status, health care utilization and self-efficacy outcomes for the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP). The major hypothesis is that during the 2-year period CDSMP participants will experience improvements or less deterioration than expected in health status and reductions in health care utilization. Longitudinal design as follow-up to a randomized trial. Community. Eight hundred thirty-one participants 40 years and older with heart disease, lung disease, stroke, or arthritis participated in the CDSMP. At 1- and 2-year intervals respectively 82% and 76% of eligible participants completed data. Health status (self-rated health, disability, social/role activities limitations, energy/fatigue, and health distress), health care utilization (ER/outpatient visits, times hospitalized, and days in hospital), and perceived self-efficacy were measured. Compared with baseline for each of the 2 years, ER/outpatient visits and health distress were reduced (P <0.05). Self-efficacy improved (P <0.05). The rate of increase is that which is expected in 1 year. There were no other significant changes. A low-cost program for promoting health self-management can improve elements of health status while reducing health care costs in populations with diverse chronic diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Psychological morbidity and spinal cord injury: a systematic review.

            A systematic review of the literature concerning the nature of the psychological morbidity in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). SCI is believed to place the individual at a high risk of psychological morbidity. The objective of this paper was to examine systematically the prevalence of negative psychological states in people with SCI, as well as to explore mediating and contextual factors. Search engines such as Medline and PsycInfo were systematically searched using specific key words, such as SCI, depression, anxiety and so on. Only studies that fulfilled certain criteria such as the use of valid measures in assessing psychological morbidity were used in the review process. The systematic review revealed that clarification is still needed concerning the psychological consequences of people with SCI. However, findings suggest that approximately 30% of people with SCI are at risk of having a depressive disorder although in rehabilitation, and approximately 27% are at risk of having raised depressive symptoms when living in the community. The review also established that people with SCI have higher comparative risks of anxiety disorder, elevated levels of anxiety, feelings of helplessness and poor quality of life (QOL). People with SCI have an increased risk of suffering debilitating levels of psychological morbidity. Future research needs to clarify the extent and nature of psychological morbidity following SCI by conducting prospective and comprehensive research in large heterogeneous samples of people with SCI during the rehabilitation phase and following reintegration into the community.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Anxiety and depression after spinal cord injury: a longitudinal analysis.

              To examine the prevalence of anxiety and depression longitudinally in a sample of patients with a spinal cord injury (SCI). A prospective, longitudinal, multiple wave panel design with measures taken on 14 observational periods ranging from initial contact in the acute stages of hospitalization to 2 years' postdischarge to the community. The National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK, and the general community. The cohort consisted of 104 patients with traumatic SCI (19 women, 85 men), although the numbers assessed at each interval ranged from 5 to 85. Measures included the Beck Depression Inventory, the Beck Hopelessness scale, the State Anxiety Inventory, the functional independence measure, and the Social Support Questionnaire. When examined longitudinally, the data illustrate a consistent pattern of results across measures, with scores highest in the acute phase of the injury and during the months leading up to discharge. The numbers of persons scoring above clinical cut-off scores for anxiety and depression highlight the need to continue to ensure that appropriate psychological care is available within SCI rehabilitation settings. Moreover, the nature of the longitudinal results provides an indicator of subtle changes in anxiety and depression over time.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                BMC Neurol
                BMC Neurol
                BMC Neurology
                BioMed Central
                1471-2377
                2014
                13 March 2014
                : 14
                : 48
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Health, Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [2 ]Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [3 ]Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [4 ]Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [5 ]Department of Applied Psychology & Human Development, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [6 ]Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [7 ]Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada
                Article
                1471-2377-14-48
                10.1186/1471-2377-14-48
                4007626
                24624961
                bef1d940-69e5-4259-83a7-ed5e30b89649
                Copyright © 2014 Munce et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 22 November 2013
                : 5 March 2014
                Categories
                Research Article

                Neurology
                facilitators,barriers,self-management,traumatic,spinal cord injury,qualitative
                Neurology
                facilitators, barriers, self-management, traumatic, spinal cord injury, qualitative

                Comments

                Comment on this article