33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The economic rationale for investing in stunting reduction

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper outlines the economic rationale for investments that reduce stunting. We present a framework that illustrates the functional consequences of stunting in the 1000 days after conception throughout the life cycle: from childhood through to old age. We summarize the key empirical literature around each of the links in the life cycle, highlighting gaps in knowledge where they exist. We construct credible estimates of benefit–cost ratios for a plausible set of nutritional interventions to reduce stunting. There are considerable challenges in doing so that we document. We assume an uplift in income of 11% due to the prevention of one fifth of stunting and a 5% discount rate of future benefit streams. Our estimates of the country‐specific benefit‐cost ratios for investments that reduce stunting in 17 high‐burden countries range from 3.6 ( DRC) to 48 (Indonesia) with a median value of 18 (Bangladesh). Mindful that these results hinge on a number of assumptions, they compare favourably with other investments for which public funds compete.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Matern Child Nutr
          Matern Child Nutr
          10.1111/(ISSN)1740-8709
          MCN
          Maternal & Child Nutrition
          John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
          1740-8695
          1740-8709
          18 September 2013
          September 2013
          : 9
          : Suppl 2 , Promoting Healthy Growth and Preventing Childhood Stunting ( doiID: 10.1111/mcn.2013.9.issue-s2 )
          : 69-82
          Affiliations
          [ 1 ] Poverty Health and Nutrition Division International Food Policy Research Institute Washington DC USA
          [ 2 ] Departments of Economics and Sociology and Population Studies Center University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
          [ 3 ] Institute of Development Studies Brighton UK
          [ 4 ] Balsillie School of International Affairs University of Waterloo Ontario Canada
          Author notes
          [*] [* ]Correspondence: John Hoddinott, International Food Policy Research Institute, 2033 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006, USA. E‐mail: J.Hoddinott@ 123456cgiar.org
          Article
          PMC6860695 PMC6860695 6860695 MCN12080
          10.1111/mcn.12080
          6860695
          24074319
          bec586e7-d496-434c-82cc-00f4deca6037
          © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
          History
          Page count
          Pages: 15
          Funding
          Funded by: Grand Challenges Canada
          Award ID: 0072‐03
          Funded by: Department for International Development
          Categories
          Original Articles
          Original Article
          Custom metadata
          2.0
          September 2013
          Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.5 mode:remove_FC converted:22.01.2020

          benefit–cost ratios,economic productivity,stunting,benefitstunting

          Comments

          Comment on this article