0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Giant baleen whales emerged from a cold southern cradle

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Baleen whales (mysticetes) include the largest animals on the Earth. How they achieved such gigantic sizes remains debated, with previous research focusing primarily on when mysticetes became large, rather than where. Here, we describe an edentulous baleen whale fossil (21.12–16.39 mega annum (Ma)) from South Australia. With an estimated body length of 9 m, it is the largest mysticete from the Early Miocene. Analysing body size through time shows that ancient baleen whales from the Southern Hemisphere were larger than their northern counterparts. This pattern seemingly persists for much of the Cenozoic, even though southern specimens contribute only 19% to the global mysticete fossil record. Our findings contrast with previous ideas of a single abrupt shift towards larger size during the Plio-Pleistocene, which we here interpret as a glacially driven Northern Hemisphere phenomenon. Our results highlight the importance of incorporating Southern Hemisphere fossils into macroevolutionary patterns, especially in light of the high productivity of Southern Ocean environments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things)

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            geiger v2.0: an expanded suite of methods for fitting macroevolutionary models to phylogenetic trees.

            Phylogenetic comparative methods are essential for addressing evolutionary hypotheses with interspecific data. The scale and scope of such data have increased dramatically in the past few years. Many existing approaches are either computationally infeasible or inappropriate for data of this size. To address both of these problems, we present geiger v2.0, a complete overhaul of the popular R package geiger. We have reimplemented existing methods with more efficient algorithms and have developed several new approaches for accomodating heterogeneous models and data types.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Whales as marine ecosystem engineers

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Journal
                Proc Biol Sci
                Proc Biol Sci
                RSPB
                royprsb
                Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                The Royal Society
                0962-8452
                1471-2954
                December 20, 2023
                December 2023
                December 20, 2023
                : 290
                : 2013
                : 20232177
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, , Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia
                [ 2 ] Sciences, Museums Victoria Research Institute, , Museums Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia
                [ 3 ] Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, , London SW7 5BD, UK
                [ 4 ] Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, , Wellington 6011, New Zealand
                [ 5 ] Department of Geology, University of Otago, , Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
                [ 6 ] Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, , Victoria, Australia
                [ 7 ] National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, , Washington, DC 20013, USA
                Author notes
                [ † ]

                These authors contributed equally to the study.

                Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6961090.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7256-2393
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5348-5043
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1029-4001
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5605-9069
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4078-4693
                http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1846-9338
                Article
                rspb20232177
                10.1098/rspb.2023.2177
                10730287
                38113937
                bce11b90-7d8b-4589-9bb1-2c61623e8869
                © 2023 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : Feburary 3, 2023
                : November 22, 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian Research Council Linkage Project;
                Award ID: LP150100403
                Funded by: RTP Stipend Scholarship;
                Funded by: Robert Blackwood Partnership;
                Funded by: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000266;
                Award ID: EP/X021238/1
                Funded by: Discovery Project;
                Award ID: DP180101797
                Categories
                1001
                70
                144
                183
                Palaeobiology
                Research Articles

                Life sciences
                mysticeti,chaeomysticeti,southern hemisphere,body size,gigantism
                Life sciences
                mysticeti, chaeomysticeti, southern hemisphere, body size, gigantism

                Comments

                Comment on this article