12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Preventive arrest in criminal procedure and police law in light of Article 5 of the ECHR Translated title: Prisão preventiva no processo penal e no direito policial diante do artigo 5 da CEDH

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract Preventive arrest is a controversial instrument of crime prevention that is commonly regulated in police law and in some criminal procedures. Its conformity with Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) has been the subject of many decisions and judgments of the European Court on Human Rights. Since its judgment in the Ciulla case in 1989, the Court has been of the opinion that § 1 (b) of Article 5 is applicable to preventive deprivation of liberty, which requires that detention be applied to secure the fulfilment of any obligation prescribed by law, if the obligation is specific enough. On the contrary, in the Court’s opinion, § 1 (c) of Article 5 is inapplicable outside the framework of criminal procedure. In the judgment of 22 October 2018 in the case of S., V., and A. v. Denmark, the Grand Chamber took the opposite view, which calls for an analysis of how far preventive arrest is allowed under the ECHR. The analysis and European standards may also be of interest to researchers from non-European countries, as the problem of the use of preventive arrests is discussed worldwide.

          Translated abstract

          Resumo A prisão preventiva é um instrumento controverso de prevenção à criminalidade, regulada normalmente no direito policial e em alguns sistemas processuais penais. Em conformidade com o artigo 5 da CEDH, tal tema foi objeto de diversas decisões de debates no TEDH. Desde o caso Ciulla em 1989, o Tribunal adotou a posição de que o § 1 (b) do artigo 5 é aplicável na segregação preventiva da liberdade, requerendo que a prisão seja decretada em atenção aos requisitos determinados na legislação, se eles forem suficientemente específicos. Por outro lado, na visão do TEDH, o § 1 (b) do artigo 5 é inaplicável a ramos distintos do direito processual penal. Contudo, no julgamento de 22 de outubro de 2018, no caso S., V. e A. v. Dinamarca, o Tribunal Pleno adotou posição oposta, o que impõe a análise dos limites de aplicação da prisão preventiva.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Preventive Justice

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Defending the Criminal Law: Reflections on the Changing Character of Crime, Procedure, and Sanctions

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Anticipative Criminal Investigation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                rbdpp
                Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
                Rev. Bras. Direito Processual Penal
                Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil )
                2359-3881
                2525-510X
                September 2021
                : 7
                : 3
                : 1597-1630
                Affiliations
                [01] Toruń Kuyavian-Pomeranian orgnameNicolaus Copernicus University Poland
                Article
                S2525-510X2021000301597 S2525-510X(21)00700301597
                10.22197/rbdpp.v7i3.609
                bc07cf1a-2b4e-4a55-92af-ee735d89dd86

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 02 October 2021
                : 04 July 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 60, Pages: 34
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Dossiê: "Personal freedom and precautionary measures in criminal proceedings"

                criminal procedure,Convenção Europeia de Direitos Humanos,prevenção,direito à liberdade,processo penal,prisão preventiva,European Convention on Human Rights,prevention,right to liberty,preventive arrest

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content151

                Most referenced authors46