7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perceptions of Stress and Mood Associated With Listening to Music in Daily Life During the COVID-19 Lockdown

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Was listening to music in daily life during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions associated with lower stress and better mood?

          Findings

          In this cohort study of 711 adults, listening to music was significantly associated with lower levels of stress. Moreover, music listening was significantly associated with improved mood, particularly for those with elevated chronic stress during the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Meaning

          These findings suggest that listening to music in daily life, a simple intervention, may support beneficial health outcomes during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Music listening is a universal human experience. People of all ages and cultures often use music to reduce stress and improve mood, particularly in times of crisis. However, ecologically valid research examining the real-time association of music listening with stress and mood during the COVID-19 pandemic is scarce.

          Objective

          To explore the associations between listening to music and the perceptions of stress and mood using ecological momentary assessment during the COVID-19 lockdown period.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          In this cohort study conducted between April 1 and May 8, 2020, adults from the general population residing in Austria and Italy were prompted by an app on their smartphone to report data 5 times per day across 7 consecutive days. Participants provided data on their real-time and real-life experiences in their natural environment while strict lockdown measures were in place. Data analysis was performed from March 2021 to February 2022.

          Exposures

          Data on self-reported music listening were recorded by means of mobile-based assessments. Perceived chronic stress was assessed once at the end of the study.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Perceptions of momentary stress and mood were measured using visual analog scales (score range, 0-100, where 0 indicates not at all and 100 indicates very much) by means of mobile app–based assessments.

          Results

          The final sample comprised 711 participants (497 women [69.9%]; median age, 27.0 years [IQR, 24.0-36.0 years]). Participants provided a total of 19 641 data points, including 4677 music listening reports. Music listening was prospectively associated with lower momentary stress levels (β, −0.92; 95% CI, −1.80 to −0.04; P = .04) and improvements in mood valence (β, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.17-2.63; P < .001), especially if the music was perceived as happy. Individuals with higher levels of chronic stress reported improved mood valence after music listening (β, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.22; P = .02).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          The present findings suggest that music listening may be a means to modulate stress and mood during psychologically demanding periods. Individuals experiencing heightened momentary and/or chronic stress because of the challenges brought about by COVID-19 pandemic–related restrictions might consider music as an easily accessible tool for the management of stress and mood in daily life.

          Abstract

          This cohort study explores the associations between listening to music and the perceptions of stress and mood using ecological momentary assessment during the COVID-19 lockdown period in April and May 2020.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

            (2013)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence

              Summary The December, 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak has seen many countries ask people who have potentially come into contact with the infection to isolate themselves at home or in a dedicated quarantine facility. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence. We did a Review of the psychological impact of quarantine using three electronic databases. Of 3166 papers found, 24 are included in this Review. Most reviewed studies reported negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. Some researchers have suggested long-lasting effects. In situations where quarantine is deemed necessary, officials should quarantine individuals for no longer than required, provide clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols, and ensure sufficient supplies are provided. Appeals to altruism by reminding the public about the benefits of quarantine to wider society can be favourable.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                10 January 2023
                January 2023
                10 January 2023
                : 6
                : 1
                : e2250382
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                [2 ]University Research Platform “The Stress of Life (SOLE)—Processes and Mechanisms Underlying Everyday Life Stress,” University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                [3 ]Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: November 17, 2022.
                Published: January 10, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50382
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2023 Feneberg AC et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Authors: Anja C. Feneberg, PhD ( anja.feneberg@ 123456univie.ac.at ), and Urs M. Nater, PhD ( urs.nater@ 123456univie.ac.at ), Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
                Author Contributions: Dr Feneberg had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Feneberg, Lamm, Silani, Nater.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Feneberg, Lamm, Piperno, Nater.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Feneberg, Stijovic, Forbes, Lamm, Pronizius, Silani, Nater.
                Statistical analysis: Feneberg.
                Obtained funding: Lamm, Silani, Nater.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Feneberg, Stijovic, Forbes, Lamm, Pronizius, Silani, Nater.
                Supervision: Lamm, Silani, Nater.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: The study project was funded by a COVID-19 Rapid Response grant from the University of Vienna (Dr Lamm), the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, I3381; Dr Lamm), and the University Research Platform “The Stress of Life (SOLE)—Processes and Mechanisms Underlying Everyday Life Stress.”
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 2.
                Additional Contributions: We thank Martin Pronizius for providing technical support without compensation and Luca Cipriano Wiltgen, MS, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Vienna, for assistance in data collection, with compensation as a research assistant. Moreover, we appreciate the valuable support of all research assistants during recruitment and data collection. Finally, we thank all individuals who participated in the study for allowing us to “accompany” them during an extraordinary time in their daily lives.
                Article
                zoi221427
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50382
                9857599
                36626171
                b9d1e71d-259f-474e-858f-650d93e4c402
                Copyright 2023 Feneberg AC et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 6 June 2022
                : 17 November 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Complementary and Alternative Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article