24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Strategic Imperative for Promoting Hospital Branding: Analysis of Outcome Indicators

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Optimizing the use of social media to promote hospital branding is important in the present digital era. In Taiwan, only 51.1% of hospitals have official Facebook fan pages. The numbers of likes for these hospitals are also relatively low.

          Objective

          Our objective was to establish a special branding team for social media operation, led by top administrators of our hospital. Here we present our strategic imperative for promoting hospital branding as well as an analysis of its effectiveness.

          Methods

          Led by top administrators, the branding team was formed by 11 divisions to create branding strategies. From 2016 to 2018, the team implemented action plans. All information unique to the hospital was posted on Facebook, as well as on the hospital’s official website. To determine the plans’ efficiencies, we obtained reference data from Google Analytics, and we compared Facebook Insights reports for 2016 with those for 2017 and 2018.

          Results

          One of the branding team’s main missions was to establish branding strategies and to integrate segmental branding messages. In each quarter we regularly monitored a total of 52 action plan indicators, including those for process and outcome, and discussed the results at team meetings. We selected 4 main performance outcome indicators to reflect the effectiveness of the branding efforts. Compared with 2016, the numbers of likes posted on the Facebook fan page increased by 61.2% in 2017 and 116.2% in 2018. Similarly, visits to the hospital website increased by 4.8% in 2017 and 33.1% in 2018. Most Facebook fan page and website viewers were in 2 age groups: 25 to 34 years, and 35 to 44 years. Women constituted 60.42% (14,160/23,436) of Facebook fans and 59.39% (778,992/1,311,605) of website viewers. According to the Facebook Insights reports, the number of likes and post sharing both increased in 2017 and 2018, relative to 2016. Comment messages also increased from 2016 to 2018 ( P=.02 for the trend). The most common theme of posts varied over time, from media reports in 2016, to innovative services in both 2017 and 2018. Likes for innovative services posts increased from 2016 through 2018 ( P=.045 for the trend). By the end of 2018, we recorded 23,436 cumulative likes for posts, the highest number among medical centers in Taiwan.

          Conclusions

          We achieved the largest number of Facebook fans among all medical centers in Taiwan. We would like to share our experience with other hospitals that might be interested in engaging in social media for future communications and interactions with their patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Patients' and health professionals' use of social media in health care: motives, barriers and expectations.

          To investigate patients' and health professionals' (a) motives and use of social media for health-related reasons, and (b) barriers and expectations for health-related social media use. We conducted a descriptive online survey among 139 patients and 153 health care professionals in obstetrics and gynecology. In this survey, we asked the respondents about their motives and use of social network sites (SNS: Facebook and Hyves), Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube. Results showed that patients primarily used Twitter (59.9%), especially for increasing knowledge and exchanging advice and Facebook (52.3%), particularly for social support and exchanging advice. Professionals primarily used LinkedIn (70.7%) and Twitter (51.2%), for communication with their colleagues and marketing reasons. Patients' main barriers for social media use were privacy concerns and unreliability of the information. Professionals' main barriers were inefficiency and lack of skills. Both patients and professionals expected future social media use, provided that they can choose their time of social media usage. The results indicate disconcordance in patients' and professionals' motives and use of social media in health care. Future studies on social media use in health care should not disregard participants' underlying motives, barriers and expectations regarding the (non)use of social media. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            On the relationship between store image, store satisfaction and store loyalty

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Harnessing the cloud of patient experience: using social media to detect poor quality healthcare.

              Recent years have seen increasing interest in patient-centred care and calls to focus on improving the patient experience. At the same time, a growing number of patients are using the internet to describe their experiences of healthcare. We believe the increasing availability of patients' accounts of their care on blogs, social networks, Twitter and hospital review sites presents an intriguing opportunity to advance the patient-centred care agenda and provide novel quality of care data. We describe this concept as a 'cloud of patient experience'. In this commentary, we outline the ways in which the collection and aggregation of patients' descriptions of their experiences on the internet could be used to detect poor clinical care. Over time, such an approach could also identify excellence and allow it to be built on. We suggest using the techniques of natural language processing and sentiment analysis to transform unstructured descriptions of patient experience on the internet into usable measures of healthcare performance. We consider the various sources of information that could be used, the limitations of the approach and discuss whether these new techniques could detect poor performance before conventional measures of healthcare quality.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Interact J Med Res
                Interact J Med Res
                IJMR
                Interactive Journal of Medical Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1929-073X
                Jan-Mar 2020
                22 January 2020
                : 9
                : 1
                : e14546
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Top Hospital Administration Taichung Veterans General Hospital Taichung Taiwan
                [2 ] Department of Medicine, School of Medicine National Yang-Ming University Taipei Taiwan
                [3 ] School of Medicine National Defense Medical Center Taipei Taiwan
                [4 ] Institute of Medical Technology, College of Life Science National Chung-Hsing University Taichung Taiwan
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu whhsheu@ 123456vghtc.gov.tw
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8565-2344
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2560-476X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5736-4337
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1192-030X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6453-4931
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2918-2413
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2789-2665
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8805-8340
                Article
                v9i1e14546
                10.2196/14546
                7003120
                32012047
                b8648a74-acdb-4004-8d83-9e6d2f808e23
                ©Gow-Jen Shieh, Shi-Liang Wu, Che-Fu Tsai, Chi-Sen Chang, Tsung-Hung Chang, Ping-Wing Lui, Yuh Yao, Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (http://www.i-jmr.org/), 22.01.2020.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.i-jmr.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 3 May 2019
                : 17 July 2019
                : 29 August 2019
                : 12 November 2019
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                social media,branding,facebook,taiwan,health services research,marketing of health services

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                12
                0
                8
                0
                Smart Citations
                12
                0
                8
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content91

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors226