8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Action planning modulates the representation of object features in human fronto‐parietal and occipital cortex

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The visual cortex has been extensively studied to investigate its role in object recognition but to a lesser degree to determine how action planning influences the representation of objects' features. We used functional MRI and pattern classification methods to determine if during action planning, object features (orientation and location) could be decoded in an action‐dependent way. Sixteen human participants used their right dominant hand to perform movements (Align or Open reach) towards one of two 3D‐real oriented objects that were simultaneously presented and placed on either side of a fixation cross. While both movements required aiming towards target location, Align but not Open reach movements required participants to precisely adjust hand orientation. Therefore, we hypothesized that if the representation of object features is modulated by the upcoming action, pre‐movement activity pattern would allow more accurate dissociation between object features in Align than Open reach tasks. We found such dissociation in the anterior and posterior parietal cortex, as well as in the dorsal premotor cortex, suggesting that visuomotor processing is modulated by the upcoming task. The early visual cortex showed significant decoding accuracy for the dissociation between object features in the Align but not Open reach task. However, there was no significant difference between the decoding accuracy in the two tasks. These results demonstrate that movement‐specific preparatory signals modulate object representation in the frontal and parietal cortex, and to a lesser extent in the early visual cortex, likely through feedback functional connections.

          Abstract

          The visual cortex has been extensively studied to examine its role in object recognition but to a lesser extent to determine how action planning influences the representation of objects' features. We provide evidence that the same object properties can be differentially decoded in the fronto‐parietal and early visual cortex depending on the upcoming interactions with the object. These results suggest that movement‐specific preparatory signals modulate object representation in the visual cortex, likely through feedback functional connections.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention

              Stimuli presented in a non-attended location are responded to much slower than stimuli presented in an attended one. The hypotheses proposed to explain this effect make reference to covert movement of attention, hemifield inhibition, or attentional gradients. The experiment reported here was aimed at discriminating among these hypotheses. Subjects were cued to attend to one of four possible stimulus locations, which were arranged either horizontally or vertically, above, below, to the right or left of a fixation point. The instructions were to respond manually as fast as possible to the occurrence of a visual stimulus, regardless of whether it occurred in a cued or in a non-cued location. In 70% of the cued trials the stimulus was presented in the cued location and in 30% in one of the non-cued locations. In addition there were trials in which a non-directional cue instructed the subject to pay attention to all four locations. The results showed that the correct orienting of attention yielded a small but significant benefit; the incorrect orienting of attention yielded a large and significant cost; the cost tended to increase as a function of the distance between the attended location and the location that was actually stimulated; and an additional cost was incurred when the stimulated and attended locations were on opposite sides of the vertical or horizontal meridian. We concluded that neither the hypothesis postulating hemifield inhibition nor that postulating movement of attention with a constant time can explain the data. The hypothesis of an attention gradient and that of attention movements with a constant speed are tenable in principle, but they fail to account for the effect of crossing the horizontal and vertical meridians. A hypothesis is proposed that postulates a strict link between covert orienting of attention and programming explicit ocular movements. Attention is oriented to a given point when the oculomotor programme for moving the eyes to this point is ready to be executed. Attentional cost is the time required to erase one ocular program and prepare the next one.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                simona.monaco@gmail.com
                Journal
                Eur J Neurosci
                Eur J Neurosci
                10.1111/(ISSN)1460-9568
                EJN
                The European Journal of Neuroscience
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0953-816X
                1460-9568
                25 July 2022
                September 2022
                : 56
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1111/ejn.v56.6 )
                : 4803-4818
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] CIMeC—Center for Mind/Brain Sciences University of Trento Trento Italy
                [ 2 ] Center for Vision Research York University Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 3 ] School of Kinesiology and Health Science York University Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 4 ] Departments of Biology and Psychology York University Toronto Ontario Canada
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Simona Monaco, CIMeC—Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Via delle Regole 101, Trento 38123, Italy.

                Email: simona.monaco@ 123456gmail.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2288-1286
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8905-7529
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5806-5961
                Article
                EJN15776
                10.1111/ejn.15776
                9545676
                35841138
                b6dfb956-8b3c-482d-9975-ad0efb792a4e
                © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 19 May 2022
                : 29 November 2021
                : 09 June 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 3, Pages: 16, Words: 10053
                Funding
                Funded by: European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Skłodowska‐Curie Actions
                Award ID: 703597
                Categories
                Research Report
                Cognitive Neuroscience
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.0 mode:remove_FC converted:07.10.2022

                Neurosciences
                action planning,decoding,early visual cortex,fronto‐parietal cortex,functional magnetic resonance imaging (fmri),multivoxel pattern analysis,object features

                Comments

                Comment on this article